2000 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Controller
(1) (b)] Means the Controller of Certifying Authorities appointed under sub-s. (l) of s. 17. [Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), s. 2 (1) (m)] Means the Controller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks referred to
Wilful default
deliberately done with open defiance and intent not to pay the rent, Chordia Automobiles v. S. Snoosa, AIR 2000 SC 1880 (1883): (2000) 3 SCC 282. A consensus of the meaning of the words 'wilful default' appears
Landing charges
an importer expends to bring imported goods to land, M/s Coromandal Fertilisers Ltd. v. Collection of Customs, AIR 2000 SC 606. Are exactly what the words mean, the expenditure incurred by an importer for bringing goods on
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Goods
Organic Chemicals including those Discrete Organic Chemicals containing elements of phosphorous, sulphur or fluorine. [Chemical Weapons Convention Act, 2000 (34 of 2000), s. 2(e)] Telephone connection and all other accessories which give access to the telephone exchange
Wilful
Wilful, deliberate conduct of a person who is a free agent, knows that he is doing and intends to do what he is doing, Dictionary of Law by L.B. Curzon, p. 361. See also Chordia Automobiles...
Voluntary
own conscience to speak nothing but the truth, Gurdeep Singh v. State (Delhi Admn.), (2000) 1 SCC 498: 2000 SCC (Cri) 449.
Secure system
reasonably suited to performing the intended functions; and (d) adhere to generally accepted security procedure. [Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), s. 2(1) (ze)] Secure system, means computer hardware, soft-ware, and procedure that-- (a) are reasonably
Residential house
ground floor, commercial plot is permitted as per the plans, Chandigarh Housing Board v. Narinder Kaur Makol, AIR 2000 SC 2616 Residential house, includes flats constructed over commercial premises on ground floor, Chandigarh Housing Board v. Narinder
Passing off
on disclaimer, a passing off action lies, Goodfrey Phillips India Ltd. v. Girnar Food & Beverages Pvt. Ltd., 2000 PTC 365 SC: (1998) 9 SCC 531. Proof of a fraudulent intention is not a necessary element in
Otherwise than under normal circumstances
under suspicious circumstances, if not caused by burns or bodily injury, Kans Raj v. State of Punjab, AIR 2000 SC 2324 (2334): (2000) 3 SCC 207. (Indian Penal Code, s. 304B) Otherwise than under normal circumstances, would
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free