2 22 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Class II service
(Irrigation Branch) Rules,1964 must bear the same meaning as the expression 'Class II service' as defined in Rule 2 (5). The artificial definition of 'Class II service' introduced by amendment of Rule 2 (5) in 1975 was
To which the provisions of Part II apply
the provisions of Part II apply, the words 'to which the provisions of Part II apply' in s. 28 of the Bombay Rent Act indicate that the exclusive jurisdiction for recovery of possession is to be exercised
Qui per fraudem agit, frustra agit (2 Rol. Rep 17)
Qui per fraudem agit, frustra agit (2 Rol. Rep 17), What a man does fraudulently, he does in vain.
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Notwithstanding, the words 'notwithstanding' in clause (1) and 'subject to' in clause (3) mean that where an entry is in general terms in List II and part of that entry is in specific terms in List I, the entry in List I takes effect notwithstanding the e
1958 in cases falling within the proviso, Sunder Dass v. Ram Parkash, AIR 1977 SC 1201 (1206): (1977) 2 SCC 662: (1977) 3 SCR 60.
Charges
they constitute a first charge on the trust property, both capital and income; see Stott v. Milne, (1884) 25 Ch D 710. Means any amount which may be demanded as a price for the rendering of some … any other charges in respect of lighthouses buoys or beacons and of charges in respect of pilotage, u/s. 22(2), Supreme Court Act, 1981 (UK), Halsbury's Laws of England, Vol. 1(1), para 313, p. 431. Airport charges in
Turnover
664. [Hyderabad General Sales Tax Act (14 of 1950), s.2 (m)] The expression 'turnover' is defined in s. 2(t). It says: 'Turnover' means the aggregate of the amount of sale prices received or receivable by a dealer … Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers v. Cipla Ltd., (2003) 7 SCC 1 (13, 23). [Drug Policy, 1994, Para 22.7 2(i) and 9] Turnover, includes tax thus tax becomes, for the time being, a part of the circulating
Cruelty
The cruelty may be mental or physical, international or unintentional, A. Jayachandra v. Aneel Kumar, (2005) 2 SCC 22 (29). [Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, s. 13(1)(1a)] The intentional and indicious infliction of mental or physical suffering on … mental suffering or fear to the matrimonial life of the other, Savitri Pandey v. Prem Chandra Pandey, AIR 2002 SC 591 (595): (2002) 2 SCC 73. [Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, s. 13(1)(ia)] Harassment of the woman where
Set-off
might be sustained, due to the party defendant from the party plaintiff. It was a defence crated by 2 Geo.2, c. 22, and had no existence at Common Law, and could only be pleaded in respect of
Migration
abode, quitting one's place of abode and settling permanently at another place, Vimla Bai v. Hiralal Gupta, (1990) 2 SCC 22.
Family arrangement
of dealings between the parties, Sahu Madho Das v. Pandit Mukand Ram, AIR 1955 SC 481 (486): (1955) 2 SCR 22. A family arrangement is intended to bring about harmony in the family, Krishna Beharilal v. Gulab-chand,
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free