Skip to content

Did you mean: 1995 8 sec 507?

1995 8 Scc 507 - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Election

declaration of the result under s. 66 of the Act, Election Commission of India v. Ashok Kumar, (2000) 8 SCC 216 (226). (Constitution of India, Art. 329) The word 'election' cannot be restricted only to the electoral process

Consultation

purpose for which the provision for consultation is made, Justice K.P. Mohapatra v. Sri Ram Chandra Nayak, (2002) 8 SCC 1. Takes place by mutual discussions and a consensus is arrived at between different authorities performing different functions

Grounds

him to make an effective representation against the order of detention, Union of India v. Paul Manickam, (2003) 8 SCC 342: AIR 2003 SC 4622 (4625). (Constitution of India, Art. 22)

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Appeal

on the material which the court had before it, State of Gujarat v. Salimbhai Abdul Gaffar Shaikh, (2003) 8 SCC 50: AIR 2003 SC 3224. Means a call to (higher tribunal) for deliverance from decision of lower, Oxford

Decree

in controversy in the suit and may be either preliminary or final, Chandi Prasad v. Jagdish Prasad, (2004) 8 SCC 724 (729). [Civil Procedure Code, 1908, s. 2(2)] Is the final order of a court in a suit,

Dowry

enveloped within the ambit of 'dowry', Satvir Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 2001 SC 2828 (2834): (2001) 8 SCC 633. [Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (28 of 1961), s. (2); Indian Penal Code, 1860, s. 304B] See also

Fraud

be evidence on fraud, Ram Preeti Yadav v. Uttar Pradesh, Board of High School and Intermediate Education, (2003) 8 SCC 311: AIR 2003 SC 4268 (4271). Fraud, is false representation by one who is aware that it was

Industrial purpose

business but not for any other purpose, Chandigarh Paper Board Mills Private Limited v. Chief Commissioner, (1982) 3 SCC 507. [Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 (27 of 1952)]

Official duty

which are done by a public servant in discharge of official duty, S.K. Zutshi v. Bimal Debnath, (2004) 8 SCC 31(38); see also State of Orissa v. Ganesh Chandra Jain, (2004) 8 SCC 40. (Cr. P.C., 1973, s.

Period of detention

Preventive Detention Act or MISA. Champalal Poonjaji Shah v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1982 SC 791: (1982) 1 SCC 507: (1982) 3 SCR 61.

  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial