Skip to content

1974 - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Inter-State route

falls in one State and the other in another State, Ch. Khazan Singh v. State of U.P., AIR 1974 SC 669: (1974) 1 SCC 295: (1974) 2 SCR 562.

Employed in an establishment

referable to home-workers as well, Mangalore Ganesh Beedi Works v. Union of India, (1974) 4 SCC 43: AIR 1974 SC 1832: (1974) 3 SCR 221.

Lawful alienation

family necessity but alienation made competently in accordance with law, Shripad Gajanan Suthankar v. Dattaram Kashinath Suthankar, AIR 1974 SC 878 (879): (1974) 2 SCC 156: (1974) 3 SCR 474.

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Lawful possession

against wrongful dispossession but cannot perse always be equated with lawful possession, M.C. Chockalingam v. V. Manickavasagam, AIR 1974 SC 104 (110): (1974) 1 SCC 48: (1974) 2 SCR 143. [T.N. Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1957, R. 13]

Maximum period

period. The word 'may' in Article 22(7) amounts to 'shall', Fagu Shaw v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1974 SC 613: (1974) 4 SCC 152: (1974) 2 SCR 832. [Constitution of India, Art. 22(7)]

Or any other process

curative power on the Court, Raja Bahadur Motilal Bombay Mills Ltd. v. Govind Ram Brothers (P) Ltd., AIR 1974 SC 1708: (1974) 2 SCC 178: (1974) 3 SCR 577.

Person employed

within the meaning of the sub-section, Silver Jubilee Tailoring House v. Chief Inspector of Shops and Establishments, AIR 1974 SC 37 (44, 45): (1974) 3 SCC 498: (1974) 1 SCR 747. [A.P. (Telangana Area) Shops and Establishments

Landlord

so receive the rent or be entitled to receive the rent, Raval and Co. v. K.G. Ramachandran, AIR 1974 SC 818: (1974) 1 SCC 424: (1974) 2 SCR 629. Mean a person who is the owner of

Procedure established by law

the majority in E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1974) 2 SCR 348: (1974) 4 SCC 3: 1974 SCC (L&S) 165, namely, that 'from a positivistic point of view, equality is antithetic to arbitrariness. In fact

Magistrate

the case may be, the Metropolitan Magistrate, exercising jurisdiction under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) in the area where the aggrieved person resides temporaily or otherwise or the respondent resides on the domestic

  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial