1968 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Shall
word 'shall' occurs and the other circumstances, Ramnath Narayana Mauzo of Margoa v. Union Government of India, AIR 1968 Goa 85. Shall, does not always mean that the enactment is obligatory or mandatory. It depends upon the
Premises
any insecticide is sold or manufactured or stored or used, and includes any vehicle carrying insecticides. [Insecticides Act., 1968 ((4 of 1968), s. 3 (m)] Premises including Precincts The word 'premises' is a generic term meaning open
Take
Cr 582: 1973 Ker LT 678. Mean 'order proceeding' to be taken, Mangulal Chunilal v. Manilal Maganlal, AIR 1968 SC 822: 1968 Cr LJ 979; State v. Manilal Jethalal, AIR 1953 Bom 365. Means to obtain possession
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Worker
Worker, means a person employed under a contract of service or apprenticeship. [Insecticides Act., 1968 (46 of 1968), s. 3 (r)] It means a person employed, directly or by or through any agency
Waste lands
same effect is the decision in Ishwarlal Girdharilal Joshi v. State of Gujarat, [(1968) 2 SCR 267: AIR 1968 SC 870: (1969) 2 SCJ 247] It is clear that these grass-lands on hilly tracts were not waste
Under colour of duty
be said to have been done under colour of duty, Bhanuprasad Hariprasad Dave v. State of Gujarat, AIR 1968 SC 1323: (1968) Cr LJ 505.
Trustee
with other persons, the trust property is vested and includes a manager, Ishwardas v. Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, AIR 1968 SC 1364: (1968) 3 SCR 441. It does not include a benamidar, a mortgagee remaining in possession after
Time requisite
make available the copy applied for, have to be excluded. State of Uttar Pradesh v Maharaja Narain, AIR 1968 SC 960: (1968) 2 SCR 842. The expression 'time requisite' means the time properly required for getting a
Take proceedings
ascribe, to it a meaning which it bears in the English language, Mangulal Chunilal v. Manilal Maganlal, AIR 1968 SC 822: (1968) 2 SCR 401. [Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1959 (59 of 1949), s. 481]
Supplies and services
to the life of the community will certainly he disrupted, Rameshwar Lal Patwari v. State of Bihar, AIR 1968 SC 1303 (1306): (1968) 2 SCR 505 [Preventive Detention Act, 1950, s. 3(1)(a)(iii)]
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free