Skip to content

163 A - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Contingent remainder

unborn child the rule has been abrogated by the (English) L.P. Act, 1925, s. 161(1). See also s. 163 of that Act. The only rule now is that the remainder must vest within lives in being at

Perpetuity

executed before 1926 or any will of a person who died before that date, and subject to s. 163 of the (English) Law of Property Act, 1925, infra, to all limitations after that date, if the rule

Lighting and Watching Act, 1833

that Act is in fore [see (English) Public Health Act, 1875 (38 & 39 Vict. c. 55), s. 163]. In a rural parish the parish meeting has exclusive power of adoption by virtue of s. 7 (1)

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Maintenance

article would be readily and easily available to the consumer, Mahendrakumar Bhagwandas Rendheria v. State, AIR 1967 Bom 163. It includes--in all cases, provision for food, clothing, residence, education and medical attendance and treatment, Kiran Bala Saha

Mens rea

R. v. Tolson, (1889) 23 QBD 173. See also BRETT, J., R. v. Prince, (1875) LR 2 CCR 163; Monsell Bros. Ltd. v. L. & N.W. Ry., (1917) 2 KB, and R. v. Wheate, (1921) 2 KB

Negotiable instruments

is not a negotiable instrument, North and South Insurance Co. v. National Provincial Bank Ltd., (1936) 105 LJKB 163. See BILL OF EXCHANGE AND NOT NEGOTIABLE. (1) A 'negotiable instrument' means a promissory note bill of exchange

Non detinet

under this plea, the defendant could not deny that they were the plaintiff's, Steph. Plead., 7th ed. 154, 163.

Plures coh'redes sunt quasi unum corpus propter unitatem juris quod habent

Plures coh'redes sunt quasi unum corpus propter unitatem juris quod habent. Co. Litt. 163, (Several co-heirs are, as it were, one body, by reason of the unity of right which they possess.)

Public authority

[see (English) Human Rights Act, 1998 (C42), s. 6(3)], Cameron v. Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd., (2007) 1 WLR 163 QB.

Raptu h'redis

there were two sorts, one when the heir was married, the other when he was not, Reg. Brev. 163

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial