Skip to content

14 3 - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Animals

the Act of 1912 (2 & 3 Geo. 5, c. 17), 1921 (11 & 12 Geo. 5, c. 14), and 1927 (17 & 18 Geo. 5, c. 27), various earlier statutes are repealed and further provision made

Limited ownership

the concerned Hindu female is thus a sine qua non for the applicability of sub-section (1) of s. 14 of the Act (Hindu Succession Act) but then this condition was fully satisfied in the case of Tulasamma … are precisely the incidents of limited ownership, Bai Vajia v. Thakorbhai Chelabhai, AIR 1979 SC 993 (956): (1979) 3 SCC 300: (1979) 3 SCR 291. [Hindu Sucession Act (3 of 1956), s. 14(1) (2)]

Sufficient cause

Kumar Sood, AIR 1992 SC 1540 (1541): (1992) 1 SCC 70. [H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, s. 14(3), Proviso 2] The expression 'sufficient cause' cannot be cons-trued too liberally, merely because the party is the Government.

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Defence

not exceed the bounds of mere defence and prevention; for then the defender would himself become an aggressor, 3 Bl. Com. 3. … writ, and in such case leave must be obtained to defend (R.S.C. 1883, Ord. III., R. 6; Ord. XIV.). In Criminal matters (which is always by word of mouth) when a person charged is arraigned before the

Recruited direct

1993 SC 2306 (2312): 1993 Supp (3) SCC 425. [Andhra Pradesh State andSubordinate Services Rules, R. 22(e) & 3(14)]

Wharfage

of the station, Raichand Amulkah Shah v. Union of India, AIR 1964 SC 1268 (1271): (1964) 5 SCR 148. [Railways Act, 1890, s. 3(14)] 1. The fee paid for landing, loading or unloading goods on a wharf

Restraining Order

or to become due; but this procedure is superseded by the procedure under (English) R.S.C. Ord. XLVI., rr. 3-14, first made in1880. See DISTRINGAS. A court order prohibiting or restricting a person from harassing threatening, and sometimes

Average of the basic wage

payable, Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co Ltd. v. Workers, AIR 1970 SC 919 (938): (1969) 2 SCR 307. [Industrial Disputes Act, (14 of 1947) Sch. 3 item 5]

In respect of

House Rates Control Act, (57 of 1947), s. 98 (9)] The words 'in respect of' used in s. 3(14) of Railways Act 1890, may be taken to mean for the provision of and not for the user

Office of profit under the government

an expression of wider import than a post held under the government which is dealt with in Part XIV of the Constitution. The true principle behind this provision in Article 102(1)(a) is that there should not be … be any relationship of master and servant between them, Biharilal Dobray v. Roshan Lal Dobray, AIR 1984 SC 385 (387): (1984) 1 SCC 551: (1984) 1 SCR 877. [Constitution of India, Art. 191(1)(a)]

  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial