Uttaranchal Court February 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rizwan Vs. State of Uttaranchal
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Feb-14-2001
Reported in: 2001CriLJ3813
ORDERM.C. Jain, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.2. It is pointed out. for the applicant that only the role of catching hold the accused (deceased) is assigned to the present applicant post-mortem report shows that the deceased died on account of single cut wound. The main accused Irfan, who is the son of the applicant is already said to be in jail. So far as the present applicant is concerned, a case for the grant of bail is made out.3. Let the applicant Rizwan shall be released on ball in Case Crime No. 53/2000 under Section 302, I.P.C. P.S. Shaymapur, District Harldwar on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Haridwar. ...
Ahkam Vs. State of Uttaranchal
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Feb-14-2001
Reported in: 2001CriLJ3818
ORDERM.C. Jain, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.2. It is pointed out that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant in the F.I.R. It is also pointed out that in the statement under Section 161, Cr. P.C. Nasim stated that Lathi blow was struck on Yasin by Ikram, So far as the applicant is concerned, he may be released on bail.3. Let the applicant Akram be released on bail in case crime No. 169/2000 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 452, 336, 302, I.P.C. P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Haridwar....
Raj Pal and ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Feb-14-2001
Reported in: 2001CriLJ3871
ORDERM.C. Jain, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned G.A.2. It is pointed out that as per the prosecution case, no demand for ransom was made. The alleged victim returned of his own without having suffered any injury on 16-10-2000, The FIR was lodged two days later on 18-10-2000. The prosecution has also shown no motive against the accused. Without reference to the ultimate merits of the case, the applicants Raj pal, Mange Ram, Rajesh and Tara are released on bail in case Crime No. 229/2000 under Section 364, I.P.C. P.S., Laksar, District Haridwar on each of them furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Haridwar....
Sudhir Singh and anr. Vs. State of Uttaranchal
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Feb-14-2001
Reported in: 2001CriLJ4464
ORDERM.C. Jain, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A.2. The allegations against the applicants, who are the brothers of the husband of the deceased, are general in nature. The husband of the deceased is said to be in jail.3. Let the applicants Sudhir and Sameer be released on bail in case Crime No. 382/ 2000 Under Sections 498A, 304B, I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. P.S. Dalanwala, District Dehradun on their furnishing a personal bonds and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Dehradun.4. However, it shall not offer a ground of parity to the co-accused, who is the husband of the deceased....
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›