Ahkam Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Ahkam vs State of Uttaranchal

Type Court Judgment Court Uttaranchal Decided Feb 14, 2001

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/513933

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/513933
Court: Uttaranchal High Court
Judge: M.C. Jain, J.
Decided On: Feb 14, 2001
Case Number: Cri. Misc. Bail Appln. No. 111 of 2001
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988[C.A.No.59/1988] Section 166; [A.K. Patnaik, CJ, A.K. Gohil & S. Samvatsar, JJ] Application for compensation for personal injury Death of injured claimant subsequently for some other reasons Held, Claim for personal injury will abate on the death of claimant. Claim will not survive to ...

Key legal issue: Criminal
Acts & sections: Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 336 and 452

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ahkam

Respondent

State of Uttaranchal

Legal References

Acts: Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 336 and 452
Reported In: 2001CriLJ3818

Excerpt

- motor vehicles act, 1988[c.a.no.59/1988] section 166; [a.k. patnaik, cj, a.k. gohil & s. samvatsar, jj] application for compensation for personal injury death of injured claimant subsequently for some other reasons held, claim for personal injury will abate on the death of claimant. claim will not survive to his legal representative except as regards claim for pecuniary loss to estate of claimant. - kotwali roorkee, district haridwar on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the c.orderm.c. jain, j.1. heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned a.g.a.2. it is pointed out that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant in the f.i.r. it is also pointed out that in the statement under section 161, cr. p.c. nasim stated that lathi blow was struck on yasin by ikram, so far as the applicant is concerned, he may be released on bail.3. let the applicant akram be released on bail in case crime no. 169/2000 under sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 452, 336, 302, i.p.c. p.s. kotwali roorkee, district haridwar on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the c.j.m., haridwar.

Full Judgment

ORDER

M.C. Jain, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

2. It is pointed out that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant in the F.I.R. It is also pointed out that in the statement under Section 161, Cr. P.C. Nasim stated that Lathi blow was struck on Yasin by Ikram, So far as the applicant is concerned, he may be released on bail.

3. Let the applicant Akram be released on bail in case crime No. 169/2000 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 452, 336, 302, I.P.C. P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Haridwar.

Same Court & Year Uttaranchal · 2001 Same Parties Ahkam vs State of Uttaranchal Same Subject Criminal Same Judge M.C. Jain, J. Acts & Sections Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161; Indian Pena...

Criminal