Us Supreme Court Court February 1969 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dunbar-stanley Studios Vs. Alabama
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-25-1969
Dunbar-Stanley Studios v. Alabama - 393 U.S. 537 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court Dunbar-Stanley Studios v. Alabama, 393 U.S. 537 (1969) Dunbar-Stanley Studios v. Alabama, No. 376 Argued January 16, 1969 Decided February 25, 1969 393 U.S. 537 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA Syllabus Appellant, a photography firm incorporated and having its principal office and its processing plant in North Carolina, was under contract with the J. C. Penney Co. to send appellant's photographers (nonresidents of Alabama) to the Penney stores in eight cities in Alabama for a few days several times a year to photograph children. Each store advertised the service, took orders, provided studio space, arranged for sittings, collected the money, and delivered the pictures. Appellant, which received a percentage of the receipts, took the pictures, processed them in North Carolina, and mailed the photographs to the Penney stores. Alabama imposes a license tax on a photographer for each county, town,...
Morgan Vs. Board of Forestry of Oregon
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-24-1969
MORGAN v. BOARD OF FORESTRY OF OREGON - 393 U.S. 529 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court MORGAN v. BOARD OF FORESTRY OF OREGON, 393 U.S. 529 (1969) 393 U.S. 529 MORGAN ET AL. v. BOARD OF FORESTRY OF OREGON ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON. No. 632. Decided February 24, 1969. 250 Ore. 460, 443 P.2d 236, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Ervin W. Potter for appellants. Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Thomas C. Stacer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. FORAN v. WEINHOFF, 393 U.S. 529 (1969) 393 U.S. 529 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court FORAN v. WEINHOFF, 393 U.S. 529 (1969) 393 U.S. 529 FORAN v. WEINHOFF ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 870. Decided February 24...
Mccrory Vs. Mississippi
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-24-1969
McCRORY v. MISSISSIPPI - 393 U.S. 532 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court McCRORY v. MISSISSIPPI, 393 U.S. 532 (1969) 393 U.S. 532 McCRORY v. MISSISSIPPI. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 153, Misc. Decided February 24, 1969. Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. W. S. Moore for petitioner. Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of Mississippi, and G. Garland Lyell, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Mississippi for further consideration in light of Smith v. Hooey, ante, p. 374. BUSH v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 532 (1969) 393 U.S. 532 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court BUSH v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 532 (1969) 393 U.S. 532 BUSH v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 857, Misc. ...
Maryland and Virginia Eldership, Ch. of God Vs. Ch. of God
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-24-1969
MARYLAND & VIRGINIA ELDERSHIP, CH. OF GOD v. CH. OF GOD - 393 U.S. 528 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court MARYLAND & VIRGINIA ELDERSHIP, CH. OF GOD v. CH. OF GOD, 393 U.S. 528 (1969) 393 U.S. 528 MARYLAND & VIRGINIA ELDERSHIP OF THE CHURCHES OF GOD ET AL. v. CHURCH OF GOD AT SHARPSBURG, INC., ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 357. Decided February 24, 1969. 249 Md. 650, 241 A. 2d 691, vacated and remanded. James H. Booser, Alfred L. Scanlan, and Martin J. Flynn for appellants. Leo Pfeffer for the General Eldership of the Churches of God in North America, as amicus curiae, in support of appellants. PER CURIAM. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of Maryland for further consideration in light of Presbyterian Church in the United States v. Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial Presbyterian Church, ante, p. 440. BECKER v. VIRGINIA, 393 U.S. 528 (1969) 393 U.S. 528 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court BECKER v. VIRGINIA, 393 U.S. 5...
Kohler Vs. Tugwell
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-24-1969
KOHLER v. TUGWELL - 393 U.S. 531 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court KOHLER v. TUGWELL, 393 U.S. 531 (1969) 393 U.S. 531 KOHLER ET AL. v. TUGWELL, TREASURER OF LOUISIANA, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 933. Decided February 24, 1969. 292 F. Supp. 978, affirmed. Donald V. Organ for appellants. Dorothy Wolbrette and William P. Curry, Assistant Attorneys General of Louisiana, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MEEKS v. FLOURNEY, 393 U.S. 531 (1969) 393 U.S. 531 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court MEEKS v. FLOURNEY, 393 U.S. 531 (1969) 393 U.S. 531 MEEKS v. FLOURNEY, SHERIFF, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. No. 81, Misc. Decided February 24, 1969. Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, A. J. Carubbi, Jr., Executive Assistant At...
New York Central Railroad Co. Vs. Lefkowitz
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-24-1969
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. LEFKOWITZ - 393 U.S. 536 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. LEFKOWITZ, 393 U.S. 536 (1969) 393 U.S. 536 NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v. LEFKOWITZ, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 914. Decided February 24, 1969. 23 N. Y. 2d 1, 241 N. E. 2d 730, appeal dismissed. John A. Wells, Gerald E. Dwyer, and Victor F. Condello for appellants. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Joseph A. Romano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Lefkowitz, and Thomas A. Shaw, Jr., and Harold C. Heiss for appellees Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen et al. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Page 393 U.S. 536, 537 ...
Baker National Bank Vs. Henderson
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-24-1969
BAKER NATIONAL BANK v. HENDERSON - 393 U.S. 530 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court BAKER NATIONAL BANK v. HENDERSON, 393 U.S. 530 (1969) 393 U.S. 530 BAKER NATIONAL BANK v. HENDERSON, ADMINISTRATRIX. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA. No. 883. Decided February 24, 1969. 151 Mont. 526, 445 P.2d 574, appeal dismissed. Thomas E. Towe for appellant. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument. ACCIDENT INDEX BUREAU, INC. v. MALE, 393 U.S. 530 (1969) 393 U.S. 530 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court ACCIDENT INDEX BUREAU, INC. v. MALE, 393 U.S. 530 (1969) 393 U.S. 530 ACCIDENT INDEX BUREAU, INC., ET AL. v. MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 889. Decided February 24, 1969. 51 N. J. 107, 237 A. 2d 880, appeal d...
Tinker Vs. Des Moines Sch. Dist.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-24-1969
Tinker v. Des Moines Sch. Dist. - 393 U.S. 503 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court Tinker v. Des Moines Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503 (1969) Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District No. 21 Argued November 12, 1968 Decided February 24, 1969 393 U.S. 503 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Petitioners, three public school pupils in Des Moines, Iowa, were suspended from school for wearing black armbands to protest the Government's policy in Vietnam. They sought nominal damages and an injunction against a regulation that the respondents had promulgated banning the wearing of armbands. The District Court dismissed the complaint on the ground that the regulation was within the Board's power, despite the absence of any finding of substantial interference with the conduct of school activities. The Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, affirmed by an equally divided court. Held: 1. In wearing armbands, the petitioners were quiet and pas...
Serta Associates, Inc. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-24-1969
SERTA ASSOCIATES, INC. v. UNITED STATES - 393 U.S. 534 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court SERTA ASSOCIATES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 534 (1969) 393 U.S. 534 SERTA ASSOCIATES, INC. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 878. Decided February 24, 1969. Affirmed. Sigmund Timberg, Lionel G. Gross, and David V. Kahn for appellant. Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Hammond, and William R. Weissman for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument. MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 393 U.S. 534, 535 ...
Johnson Vs. Avery
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-24-1969
Johnson v. Avery - 393 U.S. 483 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court Johnson v. Avery, 393 U.S. 483 (1969) Johnson v. Avery No. 40 Argued November 14, 1968 Decided February 24, 1969 393 U.S. 483 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Petitioner, a Tennessee prisoner, was disciplined for violating a prison regulation which prohibited inmates from assisting other prisoners in preparing writs. The District Court held the regulation void because it had the effect of barring illiterate prisoners from access to federal habeas corpus and conflicted with 28 U.S.C. 2242. The Court of Appeals reversed, finding that the State's interest in preserving prison discipline and limiting the practice of law to attorneys justified any burden the regulation might place on access to federal habeas corpus. Held: In the absence of some provision by the State of Tennessee for a reasonable alternative to assist illiterate or poorly educated inmates in preparing peti...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »