Wrongful - Judgment Search Results

Norfolk Shipbuilding and Drydock Corp. Vs. Garris

Court: US Supreme Court

..... it was serious enough to cause death ibid finally the maritime policy favoring recovery for wrongful death that moragne found implicit in federal statutory law cannot be limited to unseaworthiness ..... that 933 s preservation ofother claims provisions express congress s intent to reserve all other wrongful death actions to the states that argument cannot withstand our precedent since we have .....

Shirish Finance and Investment (P.) Ltd. Vs. M. Sreenivasulu Reddy

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2002(1)BomCR419

..... it an offence where any officer or employee of the company wrongfully withholds possession of such property of the company secondly it ..... prosecution of an officer or an employee of a company for wrongfully withholding the property of the company inasmuch as it has ..... was that the tribunal under the interstate water disputes act 1956 wrongly decided that it had no jurisdiction to entertain any interim .....

Correctional Services Corp. Vs. Malesko

Court: US Supreme Court

core purpose of deterring individual officers from engaging in unconstitutional wrongdoing the caution toward extending bivens remedies into any new context

Sangrur Vanaspati Mills Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh

Reported in: (2002)80ITD143(Chd.)

..... rohit jindal the learned departmental representative further submitted that it is wrong to allege on the part of the assessee that except ..... sufficient material leading to the levy of penalty but the ao wrongly dropped the proceedings without looking into the material available on ..... the assessee with the penalty for concealment or of filing wrong estimate of advance tax 8 that after an admission has .....

Smt. Krishna Devi and ors. Vs. Haryana State Electricity Board and ors ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2003ACJ1123; AIR2002Delhi113

that the party against whom he complains was in the wrong the burden of proof is clearly upon him and he

Pik Securities (P.) Ltd. Vs. United Western Bank Ltd.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

..... to the members while the bank has circulated its own explanatory statement containing derogatory and wrong information to the members further the bank has started using its own machinery to ..... members they have also complained that the explanatory statement circulated by the bank contains certain wrong particulars they have also complained that the bank is utilizing its resources to collect proxies .....

Jimmy Abraham Thomas and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2002(1)ALLMR1; 2002(3)BomCR219

..... kotwal therefore made a statement that petitioner no 12 was wrongly included amongst the petitioners and she was not prosecuting this ..... practically all filled in just as the petitioners who were wrongfully denied admissions to the courses and colleges of their choice ..... were many ways of affording appropriate relief and redressing a wrong the normal method of quashing the acquisition proceeding was not .....

Moreshwar Savey and Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2001CriLJ1765

..... are pending before this court and the c b i has wrongly shown it as a criminal offence 88 litigation regarding title over ..... chandra nijhawan v s k saraf 1999crilj268 this was a case of wrongfully withholding the property of the company under section 630 of the ..... that since it was not possible to say that the appellant had wrongfully withheld the property of the company in his possession because the .....

Kaushalya Bai and ors. Vs. Ramkishan Kirar and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: I(2001)ACC742; 2001ACJ1176

..... liability absolute liability and fault liability gives rise to action in tort the difference has been explained by their lordships of the ..... under both the provisions no proof of negligence is required no wrongful act is required to be established what is required is ..... undergone sea change with respect to negligence part and proof of wrongful act and thus to that extent common law principle of .....

Gordhan Ram and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2001(4)WLN621

..... of the act the person aggrieved means a person who is wrongfully deprived of his entitlement which he is legally entitled to ..... the general inconvenience which may be suffered by the law being wrongly administered 10 in gram sabha v ramraj singh 6 the ..... cannot assume unlimited prerogative to correct all species of hardship or wrong decision for interference there must be a case of flagrant abuse .....