Writ - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: writ Year: 2008 Page 1 of about 601 results (0.543 seconds)In Re Hilali (Respondent) (Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus)
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: Jan-30-2008
..... code for the surrender of persons wanted in category 1 territories the issue of a writ of habeas corpus was the appropriate remedy 10 the divisional court rejected the argument for the secretary of ..... of brixton prison 2005 ewhc 2405 admin 2006 1 wlr 1518 an application for a writ of habeas corpus was granted where the applicant was able to satisfy the court that he had not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNaranjan Lal Sharma Vs. Usha Bansal
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-29-2008
Reported in: IV(2008)BC205; (2008)2PLR610
..... 14 226 government contract rejection of highest bid held highest bidder has locus standi to maintain writ petition and assail action of state government or its authorities by contending that his bid .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Smt. Anara Devi and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-17-2008
Reported in: (2008)3PLR32
..... 14 226 government contract rejection of highest bid held highest bidder has locus standi to maintain writ petition and assail action of state government or its authorities by contending that his bid .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndia Road Lines Vs. Ruldu Ram and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-05-2008
Reported in: 2009ACJ1458; (2008)3PLR77
..... 14 226 government contract rejection of highest bid held highest bidder has locus standi to maintain writ petition and assail action of state government or its authorities by contending that his bid .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOm Parkash Vs. Kamlesh and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-23-2008
Reported in: 2009ACJ1455; (2008)3PLR75
..... 14 226 government contract rejection of highest bid held highest bidder has locus standi to maintain writ petition and assail action of state government or its authorities by contending that his bid .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShakil and Badrilal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-2008
Reported in: 2009(1)MPHT313
..... its power under article 226 of the constitution may not be able to issue any writ or direction to the state government to implement the scheme this is because provisions contained .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManju Devi and ors. Vs. Babu Lal Gupta and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-13-2008
Reported in: 2009ACJ1991; [2008(3)JCR622(Jhr)]
..... agency of state government and does not come within meaning of article 12 of constitution writ petitions against federation is not maintainable it is well settled that notional income is to ..... articles 12 226 m karpaga vinayagam c j narendra nath tiwari d p singh jj writ petition maintainability whether state co operative milk producers federation ltd is a state within meaning .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Shiv Kumar Agrawal Vs. Matizan Bibi and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2008
Reported in: 2009ACJ1488; 2008(56)BLJR2927; [2009(1)JCR83(Jhr)]
..... agency of state government and does not come within meaning of article 12 of constitution writ petitions against federation is not maintainable g was submitted and shiv kumar has written that ..... articles 12 226 m karpaga vinayagam c j narendra nath tiwari d p singh jj writ petition maintainability whether state co operative milk producers federation ltd is a state within meaning .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Bihar Through the Collector Vs. Krishandeo Rajak
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-05-2008
Reported in: [2008(3)JCR719(Jhr)]
..... articles 12 226 m karpaga vinayagam c j narendra nath tiwari d p singh jj writ petition maintainability whether state co operative milk producers federation ltd is a state within meaning ..... agency of state government and does not come within meaning of article 12 of constitution writ petitions against federation is not maintainable
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBabulal Mahto and ors. Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-03-2008
Reported in: [2008(3)JCR580(Jhr)]
..... agency of state government and does not come within meaning of article 12 of constitution writ petitions against federation is not maintainable 6 learned counsel for the state on the other ..... articles 12 226 m karpaga vinayagam c j narendra nath tiwari d p singh jj writ petition maintainability whether state co operative milk producers federation ltd is a state within meaning .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial