Writ - Judgment Search Results

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Hanumant and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2006ACJ251

..... in favour of employee for reinstatement with continuity of service challenge to by the management writ petition by the employee in so far as denial of a portion of the back .....

Syed Amanulla S/O Syed Abdul Khadar Vs. B.K. Venkatesh (Rajanna) S/O K ...

Court: Karnataka

..... 35 hence the impugned communications cannot be sustained in law in view of the above writ petitions are allowed and impugned communication were set aside the respondent authorities were directed to .....

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Represented by their Administra ...

Court: Karnataka

..... 35 hence the impugned communications cannot be sustained in law in view of the above writ petitions are allowed and impugned communication were set aside the respondent authorities were directed to .....

Bansidhar Ghosh Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2006(1)JCR68(Jhr)]

..... agency of state government and does not come within meaning of article 12 of constitution writ petitions against federation is not maintainable the medical evidence has not been produced the investigating ..... articles 12 226 m karpaga vinayagam c j narendra nath tiwari d p singh jj writ petition maintainability whether state co operative milk producers federation ltd is a state within meaning .....

Badal Bhandari Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2006CriLJ1589; [2006(1)JCR65(Jhr)]

..... agency of state government and does not come within meaning of article 12 of constitution writ petitions against federation is not maintainable sunil kumar dubey learned amicus curiae appearing for the ..... articles 12 226 m karpaga vinayagam c j narendra nath tiwari d p singh jj writ petition maintainability whether state co operative milk producers federation ltd is a state within meaning .....

State of Bihar and anr. Vs. Smt. Deopati Davi

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2006(1)JCR343(Jhr)]

..... agency of state government and does not come within meaning of article 12 of constitution writ petitions against federation is not maintainable 4 the learned court below recorded the evidence of ..... articles 12 226 m karpaga vinayagam c j narendra nath tiwari d p singh jj writ petition maintainability whether state co operative milk producers federation ltd is a state within meaning .....

Upendra Singh Vs. Jyoti Prakash Sao and anr.

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: IV(2006)ACC784

..... articles 12 226 m karpaga vinayagam c j narendra nath tiwari d p singh jj writ petition maintainability whether state co operative milk producers federation ltd is a state within meaning ..... agency of state government and does not come within meaning of article 12 of constitution writ petitions against federation is not maintainable

State of Jharkhand Vs. Nityanand Pandey

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2006CriLJ1591

..... agency of state government and does not come within meaning of article 12 of constitution writ petitions against federation is not maintainable 7 on the above facts we find it difficult ..... articles 12 226 m karpaga vinayagam c j narendra nath tiwari d p singh jj writ petition maintainability whether state co operative milk producers federation ltd is a state within meaning .....

The Divisional Manager United India Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs. Yallappa Bhimapp ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: II(2006)ACC15; ILR2006KAR518

..... to the directors of the 2nd respondent federation disentitling the petitioner to invoke the extraordinary writ jurisdiction the contention that respondent 2 and 5 are ineligible to participate in the election ..... be questioned in a dispute under section 70 of the act in the circumstances the writ petitions are not maintainable and are accordingly rejected keeping open all contentions to be pressed .....

Chellappan Nair Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2006(1)KLT499

..... court fee b v k bali cj kurian joseph k balakrishnan nair jj one writ petition challenging several penalty orders on the same set of facts and grounds held petitioner need to pay .....