Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 38k definitions Page 11 of about 18,045 results (0.522 seconds)

Maharaj Singh Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(2)Raj1341

..... tractor and trolley were seized by the police in connection with offence under section 29/51 of the wild life protection act. the allegation against him is that he illegally transported the chambal sand (bajri) from chambal crocodile area. it is further contended that on his application for release of the said ..... .4.2005 passed by the learned civil judge (jr. div.)- cum- judicial magistrate, bari, district dholpur in criminal case no. 206/2005 for offence under section 29/51 of the wild life protection act has been upheld after modification.2. learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that he is the owner of tractor no. rj 11-r7 49g alongwith trolley and the said .....

Bombay Environment Action Group and Sameer Mehta Vs. State of Maharash ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR235; 2007(1)BomCR721

..... both within and outside the municipal areas, shall be governed by the provisions of the indian forest act, 1927 and forest conservation act, 1980. all activities in the sanctuaries and national parks will be governed by the wild life (protection) act, 1972. thereafter, the notification has laid down in para 2 thereof that the activities as mentioned ..... notification dated 17th january 2001. the central government created an authority under section 5 of the environment (protection) act. nothing has been pointed out as to what steps have been taken by this authority, whose life has now expired. in view of the present petition, we are now being told that the particular ..... it was for the central government to appoint an appropriate committee to monitor and to take necessary effective action under section 5 of the environment (protection) act. he submitted that the chief conservator of forests has recently received the proposal of the state government to release the plots for sewage treatment and .....

Ashok S/O Jiwanmal Gidwani and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(1)MhLj561

..... , have committed any illegality in passing the impugned orders. the learned counsel for the petitioners attempted to assail the notice because it refers to provisions of wild life (protection) act. these references do not prejudice the petitioner in giving reply to the notice. these references may have been warranted on the basis of perception of the ..... and affirmed confiscation ordered by the forest officers.21. the very object of making a provision for confiscation of vehicles used in transporting forest produce or wild life would be defeated if at the drop of a hat, authorities and courts start restoring such vehicles to the owners. in an old judgment in the ..... important forest produce, being transported. secondly, the authorised officer in that case had ordered confiscation on considerations extraneous to the show cause notice. had he acted within the four-corners of the notice issued by him, may be his action would not have attracted the observations made by the division bench.18. while .....

Arvind Kumar Dube S/O Shri Parmeshwari Dayal Dube Vs. State of U.P. Th ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2970

..... singh was arrested by the forest officer and he was challaned for the offences punishable under section 26/52 ka, kha and ga of the forest act and section 29, 39, 50 and 51 of the wild life protection act 1972 as amended in the year 1991. it is contended that the allegations of the prosecution is that wood of the forest was loaded on .....

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulkpad Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1997SC1228; JT1997(10)SC377; 1996(9)SCALE269; (1997)2SCC267; [1996]Supp9SCR982; 1997(1)LC290(SC)

..... or fell and remove diseased or dry standing timber from areas other than those notified under section 18 or section 35 of the wild life protection act, 1972 or any other act banning such felling or removal of trees.3. for this purpose, the state government is to constitute an expert committee comprising a representative ..... remove fallen trees or fell and remove diseased or dry standing timber, and that only from areas other than those notified under the jammu & kashmir wild life protection act, 1978 or any other law banning such felling or removal of trees.3. for this purpose, the state government will constitute an expert committee comprising ..... : must be understood according to its dictionary meaning. this description covers all statutorily recognised forests, whether designated as reserved, protected or otherwise for the purpose of section 2(i) of the forest conservation act. the term 'forest land', occurring in section 2, will not only include 'forest' as understood in the dictionary .....

Shri Aswini Kumar Patra Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2005(I)OLR402

..... cr.p.c. to release the vehicle. this decision was rendered in connection with seizure of one indica car under section 39 of the wild life protection act and not under section 56 of the orissa forest act. section 39 of the wild life protection act lays down that when it is found that a vehicle has been used for committing an offence under the ..... act and has been seized under the provisions of the said act, the same shall be the property of the state government. in this decision the ..... acharya charan choudhury and ors., 70 (1990) clt 371 where it was held :'if the seizure is made under the provision of section 56 of the forest act and the property seized is produced before the divisional forest officer for initiation of a proceeding of confiscation, then merely because the factum of seizure is reported to the .....

Mathew Vs. Range Officer

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3961; 2004(2)KLT865

..... say that the interim custody of the vehicle cannot be given to the ownerof the vehicle by virtue of what is said in section 39(1)(d) of the wild life (protection) act.if the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle, interim custody of the vehicle can be givento the petitioner. it is necessary to give interim custody of the vehicle ..... the forest range officer.3. objection raised by the forest range officer was on the basis of what is said in section 39(1)(d) of the said wild life (protection) act. the above provision says that vehicle vessel, weapon, trap or tool that has been used for committing an offence and has been seized under the provisions of the ..... committing an offence will become the property of the central government. that means only if it is established that an offence had been committed under the provisions of the act, the vehicle will become that of the central government.4. case is pending before the judicial magistrate of the first class ii, sulthan bathery and the trial has .....

Ramgad Minerals and Mining Pvt. Ltd. Now Represented by Its Director S ...

Court : Karnataka

..... sanctuary national park under sections 18, 35 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 or any sanctuary, national park or game reserve declared under any other act or rules made thereunder even if prior approval have been obtained from the moef under the fc act in such an area.31.4 mr. krishnan venugopal, ..... or medicinal plants;(b) any purpose other than reafforestation, but does not include any work relating or ancillary to conservation, development and management of forests and wild-life, namely, the establishment of check-posts, fire lines, wireless communications and construction of fencing, bridges and culverts, dams, water holes, trench marks, ..... must be understood according to its dictionary meaning. this description covers all statutorily recognised forests, whether designated as reserved, protected or otherwise for the purpose of section 2(i) of forest conservation act. the term 'forest land', occurring in section 2, will not only include 'forest' as understood in the dictionary .....

Bihar State Pollution Control Board and anr. Vs. Hiranand Stone Works ...

Court : Patna

..... likely process-hazards, including hazard likely to occur during handling, storage and transportation of the chemicals; and(xi) provisions of the wild-life (protection) act, 1972 and the environment (protection) act, 1986.34. the guidelines also say that the criteria for relocation of existing unit would be when the board has compelling reasons to ..... the ground that these run contrary to the provisions of the environment protection act. the environment protection act is a general act while air act and water act are special acts. these two acts would not be superseded by provisions contained in the general act. the law on this point is very clear. the law says ..... apply. challenging the scheme dated 8th november, 2003, (annexure-a) it is submitted that section 3(2)(v) of the environment (protection) act, 1986 (in short 'environment act') authorises the central government to put restriction of areas in which any industries, operations or processes or class of industries, operations or processes .....

Parvati Murmu and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2006(3)JCR262(Jhr)]

..... and, therefore, sanction was accorded by the divisional forest officer for prosecuting the petitioners under section 3 of the indian forest act, 1927 as also under sections 27 and 29 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972. 3. from perusal of the entire petition no convincing ground has been set forth to set aside the entire cognizance ..... the chief judicial magistrate on 24.11.2003. i find that the offence was reported under section 33 of the indian forest act as well as sections 27 and 29 of the wife life (protection) act, 1972, but learned chief judicial magistrate without application of judicial mind and in mechanical manner took the cognizance of the offence ..... under sections 33, 27 and 29 of the indian forest act which is not appreciated. in view of the above illegality and irregularity, .....