Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 38k definitions Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 1,253 results (0.170 seconds)

Chandrappa Son of Subbe GowdA. Vs. the State of KarnatakA.

Court : Karnataka

..... to be registered in foc no.45/11-12 for the offences punishable under sections 24, 24e, 62, 104a of karnataka forest act, 1963 and rules 144, 165, 127a r/w sections 27 and 51 of wild life protection act. 1972 and investigation was taken up. on coming to know of the registration of the case, the petitioner filed petition under section ..... any of the offences alleged. therefore, the petitioner is entitled to relief of anticipatory bail.8. accordingly, the petition is allowed. the respondent - range forest officer. hanagere wild life division, arasaiu of shimoga taluk is hereby directed to release the petitioner herein on bail, in the event of his arrest in connection with the case in foc no. ..... 45/11-12 of said range forest office, hanagere wild life division, arasaiu, on his executing a personal bond for a sum of rs.50,000/- with two sureties for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the investigating .....

Sri S. Bylaiah Vs. State by Bannerghatta Police

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2008KAR1892; 2008(4)KarLJ40; 2008(2)KCCR1059; 2008(3)AIRKarR315

..... , for the offences punishable under section 9, 39, 40, 44, 49 (b) & (c), 50, 51, and schedule-ii para-i (a) of the wild life protection act, 1972 (in short, 'the act') is before this court, praying for quashing the proceedings.2. in the instant case, the sub-inspector of forest cell informed the bannerghatta police station stating that the ..... act. therefore, the petitioner is entitled for quashing the proceedings. in the result, the petition is allowed and the proceedings in c c no. 1900/2007 on the file of j m f c at anekal, for the offences under sections 9, 39, 40, 44, 49 (b) & (c), 50, 51, and schedule-ii para-i & (a) of wild life protection act ..... reads as under:55. cognizance of offences: no court shall take cognizance of any offence against this act except on the complaint of any person other than:(a) the director of wild life preservation or any other officer authorised in this behalf by the central government; or(aa) member-secretary, central zoo authority in matters relating to .....

P.V. S/O M.V.Vargice, Vs. the State of KarnatakA. by S.H.O.. Uppinanga ...

Court : Karnataka

..... six accused persons against whom a case is registered in respect of the offences under sections 2. 9, 39. 48a. 50 and 51 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 and under sections 3(1). 25 & 27 of the arms act, 1959 r/w section 34 of the i.p.c. and the prosecution case, in short, is that, when the complainant was patrolling on ..... checked a qualis vehicle which was coming from gundy side and found that there were four persons in the vehicle along with five plastic bags containing 5 k.gs. of wild animal flesh half baked and recovered from them a country single barrel gun and live cartridges.3. following the arrest of the said four persons, a case was registered even .....

Sri.Ashoka Son of Narayana Rao. Vs. the State by Range Forest Officer.

Court : Karnataka

..... as accused nos.6 and 7 and the complaint came to be lodged by the range forest officer before jurisdictional magistrate reporting the offences punishable under the wild life protection act. the petitioners, when produced before jurisdictional magistrate, were remanded to judicial custody. their application filed before jurisdictional magistrate as well as the learned sessions judge, ..... .12/11-12 of range forest office, balehonnur, registered for the offences punishable under sections 2(16), 9, 39, 50(c), 51 and 55 of wild life protection act, 1972, have sought for an order to enlarge them on bail.2. the case of the prosecution in brief is that on 16.2.2012 while accused ..... sureties for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional magistrate and subject to further conditions that.i) the petitioners shall not indulge in any acts similar to the one alleged in the case;ii) the petitioners shall not tamper or terrorise the prosecution witnesses in any manner;iii) the petitioners shall .....

Salman S/O Dr.Syed Javeed Ahmed, Vs. State by Rfo K.Gudi Police, Chama ...

Court : Karnataka

..... 2, 2(i)ii), 2(14}, 2(15), 2(16), 2(26), 2(36), 2(39), 9, 19, 27. 31, 39, 39(d), 50. 51, 57 and 24(c) of wild life (protection) act.2. the prosecution allegation in short is that, this petitioner and other accused shot a deer and on the basis of the voluntary statement said to have been made by .....

K. Ekambaram Reddy S/O K. Doraswamy Reddy Vs. Deputy Conservator of Fo ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007KAR3197; 2007(5)KarLJ112; 2007(4)AIRKarR81

..... section 2 r/w section 3 of the forest (conservation) act, 1980. it is further contended that the aforesaid case ..... karnataka forest act, 1963 (for short 'forest act') and karnataka forest rules, 1969 (for short 'forest rules') and section 8 r/w section 22 of the karnataka preservation of trees act, 1976 (for short 'trees act') and under section 2(16) and section 9 r/w section 51 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 (for short 'wild life act') and ..... land area of the bangalore palace ground, in violation of various provisions of the forest act, trees act, wild life act and other acts. several species of trees including sandalwood trees have been uprooted and buried inside the heap of soil. the wild birds habitat has also been destroyed. it is submitted that the vehicle in question .....

Magarahole Budakattu Hakku Sthapana Samithi and Others Vs. State of Ka ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1997Kant288

..... respondent company by way of lessee or otherwise was legally permissible under the provisions of (i) the wild life (protection) act, and/or (ii) the forest conservation act.re: wildlife (protection) act, 197213. let me first refer untie relevant provisions of wild life (protection) act. this act has been enacted by the parliament for protection of wild animals, birds and for matters connected therewith or ancillary or incidental thereto. clause 21 of sec. 2 ..... of lease hold rights has been assailed by the petitioners on the ground that the same has been made in flagrantviolation of the statutory restrictions contained in the wild life protection act. 1972, and the forest (conservation) act. 1980. the propriety of the transaction has been questioned keeping in view the larger interest of the tribals residing in the forest and the apprehension that the .....

M.K. Balakrishnan S/O A. Govindan, Vs. Government of Karnataka Represe ...

Court : Karnataka

..... is the contention of the petitioner in this case that the horses are also to be protected as per the provisions of the prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960 and as per the broad vision of the wild life protection act, 1972. they have sought for intervention of this court against the action of the state government ..... give priority to such natural features. article 51-a of the constitution makes it a fundamental duty of every citizen to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life. thus, the preservation of lakes, tanks and other water bodies is a primary obligation particularly in the present context where ..... in them. he has contended that article 51-a of the constitution makes it a fundamental duty of every citizen to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life and to have compassion for living creatures and hence preservation of lakes and other water bodies is of paramount national importance. .....

Ramgad Minerals and Mining Pvt. Ltd. Now Represented by Its Director S ...

Court : Karnataka

..... sanctuary national park under sections 18, 35 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 or any sanctuary, national park or game reserve declared under any other act or rules made thereunder even if prior approval have been obtained from the moef under the fc act in such an area.31.4 mr. krishnan venugopal, ..... or medicinal plants;(b) any purpose other than reafforestation, but does not include any work relating or ancillary to conservation, development and management of forests and wild-life, namely, the establishment of check-posts, fire lines, wireless communications and construction of fencing, bridges and culverts, dams, water holes, trench marks, ..... must be understood according to its dictionary meaning. this description covers all statutorily recognised forests, whether designated as reserved, protected or otherwise for the purpose of section 2(i) of forest conservation act. the term 'forest land', occurring in section 2, will not only include 'forest' as understood in the dictionary .....

S.R. Arun Kumar Vs. the State of Karnataka, by the Officer-in-charge o ...

Court : Karnataka

..... 2012 of v.v.puram police station, mysore city, registered for the offences punishable under section 18 of the karnataka treasure trove act,1962, section 25 of the antiquities and art treasures act,1972, section 51 of the wild life protection act, 1972 and section 102 r/w 41(1) (d) of cr.p.c. 1973. 2) according to the case ..... premises and conduct search and seizure. such search and seizure is only to ensure that the provisions of the act are not contravened and strict compliance of the provisions of the act and the seizure is to protect the antiquity and art treasures. the provisions of sections 102 and 103 of cr.p.c. is made applicable ..... circumstances of the case, in my considered opinion, the officer who conducted search and seizure of the aforesaid articles had no authority under the antiquities and art treasures act, as such, it was without jurisdiction or authority. in addition to this, the procedure adopted by the respondent- police in conducting search and seizure without registration .....