Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 38k definitions Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 17,821 results (0.274 seconds)

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... entitled to possess the same. 30 contravention of any condition of a licence or any provisions of the arms act, 1959 or any rule made thereunder. paragraph6offences under the wild life (protection) act, 1972 (53 of 1972) section description of offence 51 read with hunting of wild animals. section 9 51 read with contravention of provisions of section 17a section 17a relating to prohibition of picking ..... of crime linked to concerned offences and yet another added recently in 2016, such as: a) the forfeiture act, 1857 [repealed in 1922].; b) the criminal law amendment ordinance, 1944; c) the unlawful activities (prevention) act, 1967 [chapter v (inserted in 2013)].; d) the wild life (protection) act, 1972 [chapter via inserted in 2003].; 236 e) the code of criminal procedure, 1973 [chapter xxxiv disposal of .....

Rekhchand Son of Ayodhya Dehariya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Through ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(4)MPHT464

..... 1997, passed by judicial magistrate first class, amarwada in criminal case no. 457/1995, convicting the applicant under section 9 and 49a read with section 51 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 and sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for one year with fine of rs. 5000/-.2. according to prosecution, on 29.1.1995, k.p. dhurve, ..... . p/2. after obtaining the opinion from dr. s.r. suryawanshi, he registered a case under section 9, 49a read with section 51 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 (for brevity 'the act') against him and after investigation, filed charge sheet in the court. 23. learned trial court, relying on the evidence of dr.s.r. suryawanshi (pw ..... or trophy made therefrom and snake venom or its derivative];(c) specified date' means-(i) in relation to a scheduled animal on the commencement of the wild life (protection) (amendment) act, 1986, the date of expiry of two months from such commencement;(ii) in relation to any animal added or transferred to schedule i or part ii .....

Indian Handicrafts Emporium and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC3240; 2003(5)ALD39(SC); 106(2003)DLT350(SC); JT2003(7)SC446; 2003(6)SCALE831; (2003)7SCC589

..... newly added provision section 40a or that the said section discriminates individual owners and traders is ill-founded.83. at the time of passing of the main wild life protection act in 1972, there were two categories of persons who could be in possession of animal articles, etc. namely (a) individual (non-traders) - who ..... reasonable as a trader was given sufficient time to dispose of all the articles in his possession.12. drawing our attention to the provisions of the wild life (protection) act, 1972, mr. malhotra would submit that the trade and possession of ivory having been totally prohibited. even non-traders are not entitled to possess the ..... had legally been made as there did not exist any restriction in that regard. 2. the wild life (protection) act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said act' for the sake of brevity) was enacted to provide for the protection of wild animals, birds and plants and for matters connected therewith or ancillary thereto or incidental therewith. indian .....

Sheikh Tausif Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2002CriLJ1562; 2002(1)MPHT61; 2002(1)MPLJ263

..... criminal case for offence under sections 2, 9, 27, 29, 35(6), 43(3), 46(a), 51 and 52 of the wild life (protection) act and sections 26 and 52 of the indian forest act has been registered against abdul waheed ansari and babulal on the allegations that they were fishing in the reservoir of pench national park, chhindwara ..... l. kochar, learned counsel for the petitioner that the provisions of the indian forest act as amended by the m.p. act (for short the 'forest act') are not applicable in the present case as the provisions of wild life (protection) act, 1972 (for short the 'act of 1972') are applicable because the alleged fishing was performed within the area of pench ..... produce and therefore the jeep can be construed to have been seized not under section 52 of the forest act as applicable in the state of madhya pradesh but under section 39(1)(d) of the wild life (protection) act, 1972. consequently the trial court has jurisdiction to consider the application for the release of the vehicle on .....

Dr. T. Patanjali Sastry, President, Environment Centre Vs. Chairman, A ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(5)ALT315

..... habitations and their maintenances by providing sufficient number of vents for the roads existing at the time of notification of kolleru wild life sanctuary u/s 18 of wild life (protection) act, 1972 without permitting new roads and culverts;(7) right to maintain existing water courses and drains necessary to avert submersion ..... of notification, fishing in traditional method is permitted without causing environment hazard till the government acquires such private lands under the provisions of the wild life protection act. the right to do traditional agriculture without using pesticides and chemicals is also permitted. the encroachment activities are directed to be removed forthwith. ..... society, sanjaya gandi fishermen co-operative society, srungavarappadu of krishna district will be cancelled. the claimants are not entitled to any compensation under wild life (protection) act, 1972 as they were assigned the lands by the government on free of land value;(11) d-form pattas to the extent of ac .....

S. Jagannath Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1997SC811; 1997(1)Crimes189(SC); JT1997(1)SC160; 1997(5)SCALE406; (1997)2SCC87; [1996]Supp9SCR848

..... statutory provisions which require them to obtain the necessary consent/authorisation from the concerned pollution control boards.39. there are other legislations like fisheries act, 1897, wild life protection act, 1972 and forest conservation act, 1980 which contain useful provisions for environment protection and pollution control. unfortunately, the authorities responsible for the implementation of various statutory provisions are wholly re-miss in the performance of their duties ..... country'. article 51a of the constitution imposes as one of the fundamental duties on every citizen, the duty to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life and to have compassion for living creatures. the environment (protection) act, 1986 (the act) was enacted as a result of the decisions taken at the united nations conference on the human environment held at .....

Omkar Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the right to education including for the persons with disabilities.17. the rights of persons with disabilities act, 2016 replaced the persons with disabilities (equal opportunities, protection of rights and full participation), act 1995. the 2016 act was a sequel to the united nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. the ..... equally with others; 3. equality and non-discrimination.- (1) the appropriate government shall ensure that the persons with disabilities enjoy the right to equality, life with dignity and respect for his or her integrity equally with others. (2) the appropriate government shall take steps to utilise the capacity of persons ..... their existence whether as students, members of the workplace, participants in governance or, on a personal plane, in realising the fulfilling privacies of family life. the accommodation which the law mandates 31 is reasonable because it has to be tailored to the requirements of each condition of disability. the expectations .....

Shingara Singh Vs. Daljit Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... good faith but the principle of lis pendens will certainly be applicable to the present case notwithstanding the fact that under section 19(b) of the specific relief act his rights could be protected.14. in a recent judgment of this court in chander bhan (d) through lr. sher singh vs. mukhtiar singh & ors.5 it is observed, once ..... lis pendens the defence of the respondents 1 2 that they are bona fide purchasers for valuable consideration and thus, entitled to 5 204 insc37714 protection under section 41 of the transfer of property act, 1882 is liable to be rejected.15. in the case in hand also, it is an admitted position that the suit was filed on ..... which special leave to appeal was filed. in the above background, this court observed the following in para 12: 12. the principles specified in section 52 of the tp act are in accordance with equity, good conscience or justice because they rest upon an equitable and just foundation that it will be 3 (2006) 13 scc60812 impossible to bring .....

Sukanya Shantha Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of one s personality. therefore, article 21 provides for the right to overcome caste barriers as a part of the right to life of individuals from marginalized communities. the protection provided by article 21 can be seen as a constitutional guarantee that individuals from marginalized communities should have the freedom to break free ..... -faceted efforts by all institutions. in discharge of their role, courts have to ensure that while there should be proper implementation of the protective legislation such as the poa act, there should not be unfair targeting of members from marginalized castes under various colonial-era or modern laws. with this nuanced approach, we ..... of servitude , and prevent them from leading a life of dignity and self- respect . the court quoted the statement of objects and reasons of the act to highlight that when members of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes assert their rights and demand statutory protection, vested interests try to cow them down and terrorise .....

Khalsa University Vs. The State Of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... done without in any way affecting the khalsa college. as such, it is submitted that the reasoning given in the sor that the impugned act was being passed only to protect the heritage character of khalsa college is formed on a factually erroneous matrix.9. shri patwalia further submitted that the impugned ..... is to impart comprehensive education at all levels to achieve excellence and to promote research and teaching in areas of education, engineering and technology, languages, laws, life sciences and other courses under the general heads of the arts and humanities, social sciences etc.2. as the establishment of such private self financed universities requires ..... . it is next submitted before us that the amended rules are arbitrary, unreasonable and cause undue hardship and, therefore, violate article 14 of the constitution. although the protection of article 19(1)(g) may not be available to the appellants, the rules must, undoubtedly, satisfy the test of article 14, which is a guarantee against .....