Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 17 restrictions on hunting repealed Court: andhra pradesh Page 6 of about 83 results (0.227 seconds)

S. Shyamprasad Rao Vs. Union Govt. of India and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD349; 1998(6)ALT121

..... he is also the president of the himalayan wild life and environment preservation society. the said organisations may be big or small, may be well-established ones or recently started ones - that is immaterial. once it is found that he was not acting at the instance of or at the behest of or for protecting the interests of shankar trading company, there ..... was no reason to hold that he was not acting hona fide in approaching the court to preserve the forest wealth of the state in the ..... court in no uncertain terms held that once it is found that he was not acting at the instance of or at the behest of or for protecting the interests of any particular community, there is no reason to hold that the petitioner was not acting bona fide in approaching the court. the issue, therefore, arises as to whether he .....

Prof. M.V. Nayudu (Retd.) Vs. Secretary to Govt. of A.P., Ma and Ud De ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(3)ALD688

..... hazardous waste and there is existing a statutory recognition to that effect: the hazardous wastes (management and handling) rules of 1989 notified under the environment (protection) act, 1986 details out eighteen categories of hazardous waste alongwith the regulatory methods. various safeguards have been incorporated in the rules for handling and transportation of hazardous ..... the president of the himalayan wild life and environment preservation society. the said organisations may be big or small, may be well-established ones or recently started ones - that is immaterial. once it is found that he was not acting at the instance of or at the behest of or for protecting theinterests of shankar trading ..... company, there was no reason to hold that he was not acting bonafide in approaching the court to preserve the forest wealth of the state .....

Andhra Pradesh State Seed Certification Vs. the Chief Commissioner of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... previous year of such person under section 10 (23c) (iv) of the act. while under the main part of section 2 (15) activities which involve relief of the poor, education, medical relief, preservation of environment (including water sheds, forests and wild life) and preservation of monuments or places or objects of artistic or historic interests, ..... "advancement of any other object of general public utility" used in section 2 (15) of the act includes all objects to promote the welfare of the public particularly when the object is to promote or protect the interest of a particular trade or industry. the activity of the petitioner which facilitates sale of certified ..... division bench of this court held that the agricultural market committees are constituted under the above act for the sole purpose of protecting the interest of agriculturists, farmers and growers, that the purpose of the said act is to enable purchasers to get a fair price for the commodities by eliminating middleman and provide .....

Mvp Social Workers Association Vs. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Aut ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD854; 2002(2)ALT297

..... games complex (amusement park), on the ground that it affects the environment of the coastal zone of visakhapatnam city and violative of the provisions of environment (protection) act, 1986.2. the petitioner has sought for a mandamus declaring the action of the 1st and 4th respondents in making constructions in the name of mgm dizzy ..... of the sea in visakhapatnam and for any commercial purpose as arbitrary, illegal, ultra vires and violative of the various provisions of the environment (protection) act, 1986 (for short 'the act') and the rules made thereunder and to direct the respondents not to proceed with any type of construction within the area of 200 metres from htl ..... of the act and in particular section 3(1) and section 3(2)(v) and rule 5(3)(d) of the rules made thereunder declaring the coastal stretches as coastal regulations zone and regulating activities in such zones. our attention was also drawnto the notification issued by the ministry of environment, forests and wild life dated .....

Chenna Rayudu Vs. the Managing Director Prabhat Agri Bio-tech Ltd. and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... .2004 almost two years after the purchase, by then the shell life of the seed was expired, in a way preventing they from sending it to scientific analysis. 12) the complainant never tried to send the said seed to scientific analysis as required u/s 13(1) ( c ) of the consumer protection act. had the complainant was vigilant and send the seed to ..... fertility, and poor management practices etc. the certificate issued by the test laboratory shows that germination is 83% and the genetic purity is 98.8%. by 14.3.2003, shell life of the seed was expired. the complaint was filed subsequent to expiry of the period, so as to see that the seed test could not be done by any laboratory .....

Smt. Nandyala Rangamma Vs. Kum. N. Hima Bindu and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... the basis that there was a deficiency in service on its part to the complainants. in fact the tribunals under the consumer protection act, 1986 do not have the jurisdiction to enquire into heirship under the hindu succession act or other succession acts. it is for the civil court to adjudicate on those questions. in the circumstances we find that this application for leave ..... represented by him. their paternal grand father, approached the ranga reddy district forum by way of c.d. no. 170/1996 complaining that inspite of their lodging claim before the life insurance corporation of india ( lic for short) the l.i.c. did not settle their claim and, therefore, sought reliefs from the district forum. the district forum after hearing both .....

President/Head of Central Operations Undertaking Reliance Life Insuran ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... written arguments. 8. the point for consideration are: i) whether the district forum has not granted 30 days time in compliance of section 13(1) of the consumer protection act? ii) whether the insured suffered from cancer, viz.ewings sarcoma and suppressed the fact in the proposal form? iii) whether repudiation of the claim is justifiable? iv ..... disease, she procured the life insurance policy. the repudiation of the claim was on a consideration of the record collected by the investigator. it is contended that the notice was issued by the district forum of less than 30 days and there is non-compliance of section 13(1) of the consumer protection act. 7. the learned ..... of the claim. 5. the opposite parties have filed appeal contending that the claim investigation revealed that the insured suffered from ewings sarcoma prior to taking the life insurance policy and she did not disclose the disease in the proposal form which is the basis of the contract of insurance and as such the contract is .....

Apollo Hospital, Vikaram Puri, Secunderabad and One Another Vs. Kumar ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... and took the defence that there has been no deficiency in service on the part of the insurance company and the provisions of the consumer protection act could not be invoked against the insurer. according to the insurer the insurance company issued medical establishment professional negligence errors and omissions insurance policy and ..... present writ petition has been filed. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has brought to our notice section 21 of the provisions of consumer protection act, 1986 (for short 'the act') and to appreciate this contention it is necessary to refer the 'statement of objects and reasons'. the relevant portion reads as under: "2 ..... . it seek, inter alia, to promote and protect the rights of consumers such as- (a) the right to be protected against marketing of goods which are hazardous to life and property .....

The Panchayath Secretary Grampanchayath Tekkali, Rep. by S.Rajeswara R ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... respondent cannot be considered as consideration and the service rendered by the appellant is not a service within the meaning of section 2(1)(o) of the consumer protection act. the national commission held 11. counsel for the revision petitioner has relied upon the decision of this commission in the mayor, calcutta municipal corporation vs. tarapada chatterjee ..... no.2 and 3 within the ambit of section 2(1) (d) and (o) of the consumer protection act as under: 13. para 17 in the complaint states that complainant society is the consumer within the meaning of consumer protection act as it has hired the services of respondent for consideration . para 20, listing the reliefs sought, claims ..... provide facilities in the gram panachayat administration. in exercise of the powers and functions conferred u/s 44(4) and 5 (c) of a.p.gram panchayat act, 1994 and go ms.no.70 pr and rd rule dated 29.2.2000 the district panchayat officer, srikakulam shall exercise over all supervision in the district .....

M/S Kotak Mahindra Old Mutual Life Insurance Ltd. Vs. Maddireddy Nagam ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... any notice to the respondent as no improvement could be made by the petitioner/appellant. the procedure contemplated under civil procedure code does not apply to the proceedings under the consumer protection act for ordering notice before resolving the issue. the matters have to be resolved by applying principles of natural justice, equity, etc. 3. the point for consideration ..... filed in such cases for condonation of delay, the court has to keep in mind that the special period of limitation has been prescribed under the consumer protection act, 1986 for filing appeals and revisions in consumer matters and the object of expeditious adjudication of the consumer disputes will get defeated if this court was to ..... oral order: (r. lakshminarsimha rao, member) 1. this is an appeal preferred by m/s kotak mahindra old mutual life insurance ltd., against the order of the district forum u/s 15 of c.p.act along with it an application f.a.i.a.no.2773 of 2013 to condone delay of 131 days on the ground .....