Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 17 restrictions on hunting repealed Court: andhra pradesh Page 2 of about 83 results (0.221 seconds)

Krishna Murthy and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1979AP85

..... the creditor the same is the attack against s. 13 which places the burden on the creditor to prove that the debtor is not entitled to the protection of this act. it was argued that all this information would be available with the debtor and it was unreasonable to require the creditor to do the things postulated by ..... and pathumma v. state of kerala, : [1978]2scr537 .20. in regard to s. 3 (i) it was pointed out that debts to the central government, government companies, life insurance corporations and some others are excluded from the definition of 'debt' thereby creating an unreasonable classification. we do not contribute to the view that this is unreasonable classification. all ..... wiping out the indebtedness of these poor people saves them from exploitation.15. it was further contended that all these poor people depend for their day to day life and activity on small loans end debts given to them by the local money-lenders if all their debts are wiped out, no local creditor would here. .....

M. Viswanathan Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... the above cases were registered against him, under the provisions of section 20(1) (ii) (iii) (iv) and (x) of a.p. forest act, and also under section 29 of wild life protection act, 1972 and 55(2) of biological diversity act, 2002 and section 307, 353, 378 and 379 ipc. the details shows that he is a habitual offender. he is committed a series of ..... -b r/w 34 ipc; section 20 (1)(c), (ii), (iii), (iv) and (x) of a.p. forest act, 1967; section 29 of the wild life protection act, 1972; sections 55(2), 58 of the biological diversity act, 2002 and section 30 of the arms act, 1959. the incident occurred on 30.03.2015 at about 5.00 a.m. the detenu along with 12 others ..... , r/w rule 3 of a.p. red sandal wood and red sanders wood transit rules; section 29 of the wild life protection act, 1972; sections 55(2) and 58 of the biological diversity act, 2002; and section 27 of the arms act, 1959. the incident occurred on 29.03.2015 at about 5.00 p.m. at kavetipuram tank, nagari-punimangadu road, nagari mandal .....

P. Surendra Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Chief Secret ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... iii) dept., dt: 13.05.1998 under wild life (protection) ct, 1972. all acts such as destroying, exploiting or removing any wild life including forest produce from a sanctuary / national park or destroying, damaging, diverting the habitat of any wild animal by any act what so ever is an offence as per wild life (protection) act, 1972. the forests in s.v.sanctuary ..... , if the illicit smuggling of red sanders wood was not curbed; it was obligatory for the district administration, and the law enforcement agencies, to protect this national wealth; the detenu had continuously resorted to smuggling of red sanders, and had thereby caused heavy destruction to the valuable forests in the districts ..... nation and the officers entrusted to enforce the laws shall act to give effect to article 48-a of the constitution of india. thus it is imperative that the district administration and the law enforcement agencies should spare no efforts in protecting this national wealth which is the pride of our district. .....

Madireddy Padma Rambabu and ors. Vs. District Forest Officer, Kakinada ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD728; 2002(3)ALT57

..... policy under part iv directs the state to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the forests and wild life of the country. article 51a(g) imposes a duty on every citizen of india to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life and to have compassion for living creatures. though ..... and cognate expressions shall include horticulture.7. it is not in dispute that within the coastal regulation zone or within the area notified under the wildlife protection act, 1972, shrimp/prawn culture as also other types of aquaculture, are prohibited. as most of the lands of the writ petitioners herein are situated ..... that the state is under a constitutional obligation to ensure the enforcement of the citizens right to pollution free environment under the existing legislations like the environmental protection act and the coastal zone regulations.42. the apex court in s. jagannadh's case (supra) directed: 5. the farmers who are operating traditional .....

V. Muthuvelu Vs. State of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... wood and red sanders wood transit rules, 1969, sec.3 of a.p.red sandal wood possession rules 1989 and sec.51 of wild life protection act, 1967. 3. crime no.271/2014 of alipiri p.s., registered on 23.09.2014 for the offences under section 379 of ipc ..... sanders transit rules 1969 and rule (3) of a.p.red sander wood possession rules, 1989 and sec.51 of wild life protection act, 1967. 5. crime no.149/2014 of srikalahasti rural p.s., registered on 25.09.2014 for the offences under ..... personal liberty, took care to incorporate, in clauses (4) and (5) of article 22, certain minimum safeguards for the protection of persons sought to be preventively detained. these safeguards are required to be zealously watched and enforced by the court ?. ..... 9. the a.p.prevention of dangerous activities of bootleggers, dacoits, drug offenders, goondas, immoral traffic offenders and land grabbers act, 1986 is a state legislation, which is enacted to have a special law in the state to provide preventive detention of the .....

intellectuals Forum, Tirupathi Vs. State of A.P. and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(6)ALD435; 2000(6)ALT98

..... says that it shall be the duty of every citizen of india to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life, and to have a compassion for living creatures. no doubt, it is the duty of every citizen to protect the environment. here, no citizen is violating the fundamental duty. it is ..... the supreme court, on the basis of a news hem appearing in 'indian express daily' regarding falling groundwater level in delhi city, under the environment (protection) act, 1986. the supreme court gave certain directions regarding the immediate steps to be taken for regulating indiscriminate digging of bore wells and withdrawal of underground water ..... in the country. the central government was directed to constitute a central groundwater board as an authority under section 3 of the environment (protection) act, 1986. the said decision is no way helpful to the case on hand.21. the second 'decision relied upon by petitioner's counsel is dr. .....

The State of A.P. Rep. by the Public Pro Vs. Kollam Gangi Red

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... punishable under sections 379, 120-b ipc, section 20(1)(3), 10, 29, (1)(2)(b) of indian forest act and rule3 of red sandal wood possession and transit rules and sections 27, 29, 31 and 51 of wild life protection act against 16 out of 35 accused. 2) thus, from the above, leave about other accused, the main accusation against the ..... . further, if amarmani alone is denied bail, the threatening of witnesses will be taken over by madhumani. 8) the object underlying the cancellation of bail is to protect the fair trial and secure justice being done to the society by preventing the accused who is set at liberty by the bail order from tampering with the evidence in ..... government to facilitate such accused issued notification by ministry of external affairs dated 25.08.1993 in gsr570 as per the powers under section 22 of the passport act and in super session of earlier notification dated 14.04.1976 in the public interest to exempt citizens of india against whom proceedings in respect of an offence .....

Chief Secretary to Government of A.P., Gad and Others Vs. P.K. JaIn an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(5)ALD722; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)629; 1998(5)ALT339

..... made, the framers of the act would not have visualised that voluntary and charitable organisations will come forward to take delivery of such cattle and maintain them. the degree of awareness and consciousness that arose in post-independence days for the protection of animal life and preservation of wild life was not felt so much in ..... first respondent, as indicated above, could frame necessary scheme meeting the requirements in tune with the a.p. prohibition of the cow slaughter and animals preservation act and the prevention of cruelty ..... a.p. prohibition of cow slaughter and animal preservation act. the plea of the writ petitioners found its acceptance by the learned single judge who gave the following directions:'the entire scheme as to the detention and protection of the stray animals, keeping in view, the request made by the petitioner-organisations, the .....

Sree Rayalaseema Alkalies and Allied Chemicals Limited Vs. A.P. State ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(6)ALD819; 2003(5)ALT323

..... or other constitutional infirmity is established. having upheld the classification and having found that the impugned board proceedings are not violative of the equality clause/equal protection clause enshrined in article 14, it would not be possible for this court to strike down the same on the ground of arbitrariness. a legislative instrument ..... . such a promise was not contrary to any statutory provision but on the contrary was in compliance with the directions issued under section 78-a of the act. these new industries which got attracted to this region relying upon the promise had altered their position irretrievably. they had spent large amounts of money for establishing ..... and conditions of the supply notified by the board from time to time or by any provision of law touching the agreement including the electricity (supply) act, 1948 and the rules framed there under. it specifically enables the board to vary terms and conditions of supply by special or general proceedings. therefore, .....

Forum for Sustainable Development Vs.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... project does not fall under unreserved/reserved forest land. communication also reveals that there are no notified ecologically sensitive areas under the provisions of the wife life (protection) act, 1972 in the vicinity of the proposed project site, revealing further that the project area is neither a foraging ground nor nesting ground for large ..... (ix)whether project site is forest / swamp lands " (x)whether project site falls in the vicinity of the areas notified under the provisions of the wife life (protection) act, 1972 as ecologically sensitive. (xi)what is the legal status/classification of the project site. (xii) whether project site is foraging ground / nesting ground for ..... proposed power project site allotted to the 4th respondent. .............as per the records maintained by the forest department, naupada swamp is not declared as protected area by the government at any point of time. neither the project site nor its vicinities are declared as conservation sites and as such all .....