Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: visva bharati act 1951 section 19 the samsad court Page 99 of about 1,827 results (0.167 seconds)

Abhiram Singh Vs. C.D. Commachen (Dead) by Lrs. and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... elector and whether the appeal if made is in violation of the provisions of sub-section (3) of section 123 of the representation of the people act, 1951.50. the reference is answered as above and the matter may be placed before hon ble the chief justice for necessary orders. .....................................................j ( madan ..... analysed is whether this interpretation is belied by the legislative history of the statutory provision. e. legislative history 24 originally, the representation of the people act, 1951 distinguished between major corrupt practices (which were defined in section123) and minor corrupt practices (in section 124). among the minor corrupt practices, sub- ..... recording her dissent smt. chakravartty stated that : the major amendment in the bill is clause 23 seeking to amend section 123 of the principal act (1951). the ostensible reason given is that communal and caste propaganda and the enmity arising there from, must be checked for the purposes of strengthening .....

Public Interest Foundation Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... framed by a criminal court in respect of offences involving moral turpitude and also offences specifically referred to in chapter iii of the representation of the people act, 1951. 14 13. the thrust of the matter is whether any disqualification can be read as regards disqualification for membership into the constitutional provisions. article 102(1 ..... be added by or under any law made by the parliament. article 191 has the same character.14. chapter iii of the representation of the people act, 1951 (for brevity, the act ) deals with disqualification for membership of the parliament and the state legislatures. section 7 deals with definitions. it is as follows:- 7. definitions. in ..... of this court in state of himachal pradesh and others v. satpal saini22 and 20 (1979) 1 scc56021 (2000) 6 scc21322 (2017) 11 scc4273 kesavananda bharati v. state of kerala and another23 wherein the doctrine of separation of powers was concretised by this court. it is the contention of the first respondent that .....

Sri Marthanda Varma (D) Th. Lr. . Vs. State of Kerala .

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... and 3 of the bill), and by way of consequential change, section 168 of the representation of the people act, 1951 is being omitted (clause 4 of the bill).3. the exemptions under the wealth tax act, 1957 in respect of the one residence and heirloom jewellery of each former ruler is being limited for his lifetime ..... of inheritance from the founder. (emphasis added) 63. soon thereafter, the author of the leading judgment in angurbala mullick21, delivered tagore law lectures in august 1951 which were then published in the form of a comprehensive book under the caption the hindu law of religious endowments and charitable trusts . after dealing with endowments ..... directed by this hon ble court.2. the trustee shall delegate his powers of administration under section 18(2) of the travancore-cochin hindu religious institutions act, 1950 (the act ) to a committee (the administrative committee ) which shall administer the temple through an executive officer to be appointed by the committee.3. the .....

Mohd. Abdullah Azam Khan Vs. Nawab Kazim Ali Khan

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... rampur, as void and consequently came to be set aside. factual background of the case 1 2. the notification under the representation of the people act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the act 1951 ) was notified for holding election of u.p. state legislative assembly from 34, suar, district rampur constituency. public notice was issued by the ..... court in rakesh kumar (supra) wherein as regards the determination of age of the candidate in terms of section 36(2) of the representation of the people act, 1951, this court observed : 27. in sushil kumar v. rakesh kumar [(2003) 8 scc673 this court as regards determination of age of a candidate in 51 ..... .appellant(s) versus nawab kazim ali khan .respondent(s) judgment rastogi, j.1. instant appeal has been filed under section 116a of the representation of people act, 1951 assailing the judgment and order dated 16th december, 2019 passed by the high court of judicature at allahabad, holding the election of the returned candidate (appellant) from .....

Bilkis Yakub Rasool Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... , unless supported by quid pro quo, this court held, interfered with the control exercised by the central government under the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951 (for short idr act, 1951 ) and the various orders made thereunder with respect to prices, licences, permits, distribution, transport, disposal, acquisition, possession, use, consumption, etc., ..... was faced with the situation where a conviction of some of the accused persons by this court under the terrorist and disruptive activities (prevention) act, (tada act) was sought to be challenged under article 32 of the writ petition (crl.) no.491 of 2022 etc. page 108 of 251 constitution ..... that, considerations of religion, caste, colour or political loyalty are totally irrelevant and fraught with discrimination. the function of determining whether the act of a constitutional or statutory functionary falls within the constitutional or legislative conferment of power or is vitiated by self-denial or an erroneous appreciation .....

Nabam Rebia and Etc. Etc. Vs. Deputy Speaker and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... should discharge his functions in his own discretion.134. insofar as the question of judicial review is concerned, it was submitted, that this court in the kesavananda bharati case17 had recognized judicial review, as a part of the basic structure of the constitution. it was also acknowledged, that a series of judgments rendered by this ..... actual working of article 85 of the constitution posed some problems. this led to the first amendment to the constitution.34. the parliamentary debate of 16th may, 1951 shows that when the constitution (first amendment) bill was moved by prime minister jawaharlal nehru, he pointed out that parliament had been in continuous session since november ..... . (3) if any question arises whether any matter is or is not a matter as respects which the governor-general is by or under this act required to act in his discretion or to exercise his individual judgment, the decision of the governor-general in his discretion shall be final, and the validity of anything .....

Janhit Abhiyan Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... and content: and history can furnish a safe and certain clue to their answer . after considering the history of the newly inserted provision (by the first amendment act, 1951) it was held that 24. looking back over the past thirty years of constitutional history of our country, we as lawyers and judges, must endorse the ..... and intendment is to remove inequalities in the matter of agricultural holdings.49. we propose to draw a line, treating the decision in kesavananda bharati as the landmark. several acts were put in the ninth schedule prior to that decision on the supposition that the power of the parliament to amend the constitution was wide ..... constitution should be read and interpreted in the light of the grand and noble visions envisaged in the preamble. a close analysis of the opinions in kesavananda bharati case [kesavananda bharati v. state of kerala, (1973) 4 scc225 shows that all the provisions of the constitution, including the fundamental rights, could be amended or altered .....

Subhash Desai Vs. Principal Secretary, Governor Of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the term political party as it occurs in the tenth schedule relates to the association of persons registered under section 29a of the representation of the people act 1951. political party refers to the leadership structure subsisting on the date of the alleged prohibited conduct until the recognition of the political party and its leadership structure ..... of presenting a defence to the actions of the legislators which would otherwise have amounted to defection; and b. section 29a of the representation of the people act 1951 requires an association of individuals calling itself a political party to be registered 84 part e with the eci. the party need not have returned candidates to ..... which their faction emerged.52 the unsuccessful group must now apply for the registration of its political party under section 29a of the representation of the people act 1951. the eci will allot a symbol to the political party when it is recognised as a state or national party under the symbols order.137. the .....

Ananda Sankar and ors. Vs. Chief Secretary to the Government of West B ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1953Cal129

..... harries, c.j. 1. these are applications for writs in the nature of habeas corpus filed by persons detained under the preventive detention act, 1950 as amended by the preventive detention act of 1951. a number of the detenus were detained under orders made in february 1950 and in the cases of these detenus what are called supplementary ..... in which the earlier applications were made. 46. these applications now before us were made after the act of 1951 was passed amending the earlier preventive detention act of 1950. in these applications it was contended that the later amending act was ultra vires and further that if it was intra vires, certain new rights were granted to ..... the orders were made or very shortly afterwards. 2. these applications were made after the act of 1951 amending the preventive detentionact of 1950 was passed and it was contended on behalf of all the detenus that this amending act was ultra vires the constitution. we heard a full argument on this question before the supreme .....

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... to consider mysore house rent and accommodation control 78 order, 1948, which was a pre constitution law and by part b states (laws) act, 1951 extended the operation of transfer of property act, 1882 in the state of mysore. in the above case arguments were raised that the house rent and accommodation control order, 1948 as extended ..... of individuals or communities. 137. section 80a which has been referred in the notification is a provision which has been inserted by u.p. act 18 of 1951 with effect from 06.10.1951. section 80a is as follows: 80a. the state government may, by notification in the official gazette, declare that any of the provisions ..... position is not in dispute.88. the validity of 1957 act was considered in the context of industries (development and regulation) 75 act,1951 and mines and minerals(development and regulation) act, 1948. this court repelled challenge to the 1952 act on the ground that the declaration under 1948 act was not referable to entry 54.89. the next judgment .....