Court : Karnataka
..... and:1. . the principal secretary department of revenue government of karnataka m.s. building bengaluru - 560 001. 2 . sri. sringeri mutt vidabhinava narasimha bharati swami guru sachidananda shankar bharati swamigalu, kudli shivamogga taluk shivamogga - 577 227. 3 . the tahasildhar hirekerur taluk haveri - 581 111. respondents (by sri. prabhuling k navadagi, ag ..... kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 ..... reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... and:1. . the principal secretary department of revenue government of karnataka m.s. building bengaluru - 560 001. 2 . sri. sringeri mutt vidabhinava narasimha bharati swami guru sachidananda shankar bharati swamigalu, kudli shivamogga taluk shivamogga - 577 227. 3 . the tahasildhar hirekerur taluk haveri - 581 111. respondents (by sri. prabhuling k navadagi, ag ..... kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 ..... reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... and:1. . the principal secretary department of revenue government of karnataka m.s. building bengaluru - 560 001. 2 . sri. sringeri mutt vidabhinava narasimha bharati swami guru sachidananda shankar bharati swamigalu, kudli shivamogga taluk shivamogga - 577 227. 3 . the tahasildhar hirekerur taluk haveri - 581 111. respondents (by sri. prabhuling k navadagi, ag ..... kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 ..... reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... and:1. . the principal secretary department of revenue government of karnataka m.s. building bengaluru - 560 001. 2 . sri. sringeri mutt vidabhinava narasimha bharati swami guru sachidananda shankar bharati swamigalu, kudli shivamogga taluk shivamogga - 577 227. 3 . the tahasildhar hirekerur taluk haveri - 581 111. respondents (by sri. prabhuling k navadagi, ag ..... kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 ..... reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... and:1. . the principal secretary department of revenue government of karnataka m.s. building bengaluru - 560 001. 2 . sri. sringeri mutt vidabhinava narasimha bharati swami guru sachidananda shankar bharati swamigalu, kudli shivamogga taluk shivamogga - 577 227. 3 . the tahasildhar hirekerur taluk haveri - 581 111. respondents (by sri. prabhuling k navadagi, ag ..... kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 ..... reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... and:1. . the principal secretary department of revenue government of karnataka m.s. building bengaluru - 560 001. 2 . sri. sringeri mutt vidabhinava narasimha bharati swami guru sachidananda shankar bharati swamigalu, kudli shivamogga taluk shivamogga - 577 227. 3 . the tahasildhar hirekerur taluk haveri - 581 111. respondents (by sri. prabhuling k navadagi, ag ..... kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 ..... reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... s) referred to in sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), or covered in sub-section (3), of section 8 of the representation of the people act, 1951 (43 of 1951)]. and sentenced to imprisonment for one year or more. if the deponent is convicted and punished as aforesaid, he shall furnish the following information: in the following case ..... addressed to the issue pertaining to undue influence. the court observed: "we may in this connection refer to section 123(2) of the representation of the people act 1951 which also defines "undue influence". the definition there is more or less in the same language as in section 171-c of the indian penal code except that ..... as follows:"60. corrupt practices - the following shall be deemed to be corrupt practice for the purposes of this act:- (1) bribery as defined in clause (1) of section 123 of the representation of people act, 1951. (central act xliii of 1951) (2) undue influence as defined in clause (2) of the said section."39. from the aforesaid provisions, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... above doctrine was in those cases where this court exercised its power under article 142 of the constitution to render complete justice; (v) by maharashtra act xxiii of 2001 there is a legislative codification of the broad principles enunciated in madhuri patil. the legislation provides a statutory framework for regulating the issuance ..... for the confiscation and cancellation of false certificates . section 7 is in the following terms : 7. (1) where, before or after the commencement of this act, a person not belonging to any of the scheduled castes, scheduled tribes, de-notified tribes (vimukta jatis), nomadic tribes, other backward classes or special backward ..... de-notified tribes (vimukta jatis), nomadic tribes, other backward classes and special backward category 10 part a (regulation of issuance and verification of) caste certificate act, 2000. the legislation essentially takes care, for that state of the concerns that were expressed in the decision of this court in madhuri patil by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... c.s.) association, u.p. and others,(1993) supp.(1) scc730 this court had occasion to explain the expression consultation as occurring in all india services act, 1951. in paragraph 26, following conclusions were recorded by this court:- 26.(1) consultation is a process which requires meeting of minds between the parties involved in the ..... , to accept the argument that we should read down article 31-c, so as to make it conform to the ratio of the majority decision in kesavananda bharati [kesavananda bharati v. state of kerala, 1973 supp scr1: (1973) 4 scc225: air1973sc1461 , is to destroy the avowed purpose of article 31-c as indicated by ..... enjoins a constitutional duty to interpret and protect the constitution. this court is guardian of the constitution.177. we may also quote justice mathew, in keshavananda bharati(supra), where he reiterated that judicial function is both creation and application of law. the principle of indra sawhney is both creation application of law. in paragraph .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... punishable. draft constitution prepared 15. (1) there shall be liberty for the exercise 43 sourced from the article arguments from colonial continuity the constitution (first amendment) act, 1951 (2008) of burra, arudra, assistant professor, department of humanities and social sciences , iit (delhi), 30 by b. n. rau, october 1947 of the ..... the majority in adm jabalpur are seriously flawed. life and personal liberty are inalienable to human existence. these rights are, as recognised in kesavananda bharati, primordial rights. they constitute rights under natural law. the human element in the life of the individual is integrally founded on the sanctity of ..... agencies through a courts of law. these observations gain legitimacy from the judgment of mathew, j.in his holiness kesavanada bharati sripadagalvaru vs. state of kerala, (1973) 4 scc225(kesavanada bharati) wherein his lordship recognized the object of constitutions to declare recognised natural rights as applicable qua the state. adopting .....
Tag this Judgment!