Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: visva bharati act 1951 section 19 the samsad court Page 1 of about 1,827 results (0.161 seconds)

Mar 03 2005 (SC)

Sushanta Tagore and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC1975; (SCSuppl)2005(2)CHN183; JT2005(3)SC48; (2005)3SCC16; (2005)2UPLBEC1615

..... , in exercise of its legislative power conferred on it under entry 63, list i of the seven schedule of the constitution of india enacted the visva-bharati act, 1951 (the act) declaring it to be an institution of national importance. the university was constituted as an unitary, teaching and residential university with a view to preserve ..... inter alia, environmental and pollution control laws and requirements which had endangered the very purpose, tradition and objective with which visva bharati was established and which was thereafter sought to be preserved by the act. the appellants herein who are in particular aggrieved by proposed constructions which are likely to come up in the area ..... west bengal. the state, having regard to the purport and object of the act, has, thus, a duty to see that the environmental ambiance which would not be in consonance with the ideals of visva bharati should not be undertaken. visva bharati is sui generis. it is an institution of national importance. it is a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 2006 (SC)

Milk Producers Association, Orissa and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC3508; 101(2006)CLT715(SC); JT2006(2)SC217; 2006(2)SCALE262; (2006)3SCC229

..... and special features of visva-bharati university. therein, this court opined:it may be true that the development of a town is the job of the town planning authority ..... have noticed hereinbefore that the provisions of the orissa municipal corporation act also aim at maintenance of health and hygienic amongst the residents of the town of bhubaneswar.18. in sushanta tagore and ors. v. union of india and ors. : air2005sc1975 , this court was concerned with interpretation of the provisions of visva-bharati act, 1951 which was enacted to preserve and protect the uniqueness, tradition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 1992 (HC)

Mangaliya and ors. Vs. Mst. Pancho and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1993MP175

..... keeping in view the principles underlying the 'mischief rule'. 19. reliance is placed by shri vajpei on section 35, m.b. land revenge and tenancy act to submit that the right of appeal contemplated under section 275, quanoon mal stood abrogated in virtue of the provisions thereof, contemplating a 'first appeal' and ..... because under section 11, the revenue officers' hierarchy is reconstituted under the new political set-up. in virtue of section 28-a m.b. general clauses act, 1950, 'subas' and 'naib subas' became collectors and that position is maintained in the code while introducing an intermediate forum of sub-divisional officer. 15. ..... code, are classified 'revenue officers' including 'tahsildars', 'sub-divisional officers', 'collectors' and other functionaries upto the level of 'commissioners' who are in any manner acting with revenue administration and are entrusted with powers or duties under the code. the object of section 19 is to empower in each tahsil 'the tahsildar' to exercise .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 04 1995 (HC)

Visva Bharati Vs. Smt. Rakhi Debnath and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1996)1CALLT51(HC)

..... was engaged itself to preserve, protect and improvise the musical legendary work of rabindra nath tagore. but by virtu of the amendment of the visva bharati act, 1951, visva bharati music board was amalgamated with the 'visva bharati' and all properties including assets, rights and liabilities became vested in the petitioner no. 1. the petitioner no. 2 who is a joint ..... consumer redressal forum without awaiting the results of the board hurriedly, filed a consumer dispute. it is claimed by the petitioner no. 1 that the visva bharati authority had not been impleaded as a party before the district consumers redresal forum but the complainant somehow to take an order only impleaded respondent no. ..... with approval fee of rs. 120/- for cassette.4. the label design of the cassette should inscribe the words approved by the visya bharati music board or visva bharati snageet samiti anumodita.5. you will have to send us 12 complimentary copies of the cassette.you are requested to send us the cassettes .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 2008 (HC)

Mukesh Jagdishbhai Vasava Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2009)1GLR117

..... 2006 on 27.06.2006.2.1 the petitioner-accused filed an application, exhibit 69, under the provisions of the juvenile justice (care & protection of children) act, 2000 ['the act' for short] contending that his birth date is 21.11.1988 and, therefore, on 27.06.2006 when the complaint was filed, he was below the ..... of birth certificate dated 16.10.2007 issued by talati-cum-mantri, haldar gram panchayat, taluka & district: bharuch issued under the provisions of the births & deaths registration act, 1969 at mark 71/2 and the school leaving certificate dated 19.06.2004 issued by shree lallubhai jijibhai vidyalaya, haldar, taluka & district: bharuch at mark 71/ ..... the petitioner-accused produced birth certificate at mark 71/1 issued by the talati-cum-mantri, haldar gram panchayat under the provisions of the births & deaths registration act, 1969 [annexure-b]. it indicates the birth date of the petitioner as 21.11.1988. the petitioner-accused also examined his uncle vasava jivanjibhai at exhibit 76, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 1972 (HC)

Roshanali Akbaralli and ors. Vs. Nabiji Nathaji Vohra (Deed.) His Lega ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1974)15GLR116

..... it is not a correct statement to say that the procedure contemplated by civil procedure code is not at all applicable to inquiry proceedings contemplated fay section 19 of the act. if any authority is required on this point, the same would be found in the bombay case of vinoba v. balkrishna : air1968bom14 .10. now ..... the assistant judge, the trustees have approached this court in appeal.9. on behalf the respondents it was contended that in proceedings under section 19 of the act, which are undertaken before the deputy or the assistant charity commissioner, provisions of civil procedure code have no application and, therefore, the application for setting aside an ..... a contention was raised on behalf of the appellants-trustees that the learned charity commissioner ought to have exercised his revisional jurisdiction under section 70a of the act, in case it was found that the order against which the appeal was preferred, was not appealable. even this contention was rejected by the learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 1982 (HC)

Visva Bharati Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1983)ILLJ332Cal

..... co. ltd. v. regional provident fund commissioner, u.p. reported in 1961-ii l.l.j. 444.12. the visva-bharati university was incorporated under the provisions of the visva-bharati act, 1951. section 4 of the act which deals with the incorporation of the university reads as follows:4. incorporation: - the first acharya (chancellor) and upacharya ( ..... teaching and residential university as laid down in section 4 of the said act, and the university as a whole should be taken into account in considering the question ..... directed to exempt the university from the application of the act under the provisions of section 16(2) of the act.9. mr. p.p. ginwalla, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, has submitted that the university which was incorporated under the visva-bharati act, 1951 was constituted as a body corporate as a unitary .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 1985 (SC)

Andhra University Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner of Andhra P ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1986SC463; [1985(51)FLR605]; 1986LabIC103; (1986)ILLJ155SC; 1985(2)SCALE752; (1985)4SCC509; [1985]Supp3SCR582; 1986(1)LC31(SC)

..... be brought within the mischief of the act.' we have no hesitation to hold that the aforesaid view expressed by the learned judge is not correct or sound and that ..... the visva-bharati university. the learned judge was of the view that 'if the university as an establishment does not come under the provisions and or the purview of the act, the different branches or departments of the university which the university empowered and or entitled to maintain under the provision of the visva bharati act cannot ..... is run by a larger organisation which may be carrying on other additional activities falling outside the act.8. our attention was drawn to a decision of a learned single judge of the calcutta high court in visva bharati v. regional provident fund commissioner, west bengal : (1983)illj332cal wherein it was held that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 23 2000 (SC)

Christian Medical College Vs. E.S.i.C

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2001(88)FLR267]; (2001)ILLJ18SC; (2001)1MLJ112(SC); 2000(7)SCALE575; (2001)1UPLBEC181

..... be brought within the mischief of the act.' we have no hesitation to hold that the aforesaid view expressed by the learned judge is not correct or sound and that ..... the visva bharati university. the learned judge was of the view that 'if the university as an establishment does not come under the provisions and or the purview of the act, the different branches or departments of the university which the university is empowered and or entitled to maintain under the provision of the visva bharati act cannot ..... establishment is run by a larger organisation which may be carrying on other additional activities falling outside the act. 8. our attention was drawn to a decision of a learned single judge of the calcutta high court in visva bharati v. regional provident fund commissioner, w.b. : (1983)illj332cal , wherein it was held that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2014 (HC)

Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs. Sir Ganga Ram Trust Society

Court : Delhi

..... be brought within the mischief of the act."we have no hesitation to hold that the aforesaid view expressed by the learned judge is not correct or sound and that the ..... provisions and or the purview of the act, the different branches or departments of the university which the university is empowered and or entitled to maintain under the provision of the visva bharati act cannot ..... , w.b. manu/wb/0382/1982 : (1983)illj332cal , wherein it was held that the provisions of the act were inapplicable in respect of a "silpa sadan", agricultural farm and a hospital run by the visva bharati university. the learned judge was of the view that "if the university as an establishment does not come under the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //