Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: visva bharati act 1951 section 19 the samsad court Page 10 of about 1,827 results (0.172 seconds)

Aug 18 2009 (HC)

M.R. Reghuchandrabal Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2009(3)KLJ131

..... any executive instruction issued under section 4(1) thereof. this result follows from the fact that conferment of jurisdiction is under section 3 of the act and exercise of powers of investigation is by virtue of the statutory provisions governing investigation of offences. it is settled that ' statutory jurisdiction cannot ..... conducted by the vigilance department there are reasonable grounds to believe that the accused government servant has committed an offence under the prevention of corruption act, the preliminary enquiry will be stopped and a crime is to be registered and investigated after obtaining sanction from the director of vigilance investigation. ..... is illegal and unprecedented and intended only to harass the petitioner. petitioner approached the state public information officer, under the provisions of right to information act to get the details of investigation. under ext. p4 reply petitioner was informed that after completing the investigation it was submitted to the director .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 09 1978 (HC)

Ram Rakh Vyas Vs. Atal Behari Vajpayee Minister for External Affairs a ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1978(11)WLN304

..... secrecy of what passed at a cabinet meeting. according to him, this is essential because the dissensions may not be brought to light tennings : cabinet government 1951 p. 258, the need for secrecy ii based on the principle which follows from the confidential nature of the advice given by the minister to the head ..... if so, whether removal is the penalty provided?9. whether a successor government or a successor minister is constitutionally bound to treat the information about the various acts, omissions and commission's of the previous government or predecessor as secret?10. whether the rajasthan high court has got jurisdiction to entertain this writ petition against ..... exact phrase used in oath is as follows,-except as may he required for the due discharge of my duties as a minister.10. the official secrets act no. 19 of 1923 also provides legal sanction to prevent disclosure of official secret information11. different constitutions of the other countries have got different forms of oath .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2007 (HC)

Madathil Marakar Haji Vs. Vakkom B. Purushothaman and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2008CriLJ742

..... against a chief engineer which was addressed to the chief minister of the state and also another minister, alleging various offences under the prevention of corruption act. on receipt of the above complaint, the chief minister asked the director, vacb, to make a confidential enquiry. thereafter, the government received a note ..... inquiry' was conducted by vigilance and anti-corruption department into the allegations made against a public servant regarding commission of offences under the p.c. act, by examining large number of witnesses and by perusing several documents. the supreme court observed that the procedure adopted in conducting a preliminary enquiry is not ..... than through court. a private complaint received by the special judge under section 190 is ordinarily subjected to strict judicial scrutiny and no court normally acts upon any vague, cryptic or anonymous complaint which does not reveal any particulars of the offence and such a complaint will not normally be forwarded .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 2000 (HC)

Hasem Mohamad Jeva Vs. Shantaben W/O Parvinbhai Vasava

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2000)4GLR757

..... different awards, to the appellant and other petitioners. the amount of rs. 25,000/- deposited along with the appeal under section 173 of the motor vehicles act shall be transmitted by the tribunal forthwith for being disbursed to the claimants in terms of the conditions incorporated in the impugned order.in view of the common ..... and the ultimate conclusion recorded by it is, in any way, wrong, unjustified or unreasonable, requiring our interference exercising our powers under section 110d of the old act. the tribunal, on dispassionately going to the tenor and text of the impugned judgement, has dealt with all the points raised before us in extenso and has ..... of the appellant original opponent no. 2, owner of the truck and in course of employment the accident occurred and therefore the claimants claimed compensation for the tortious act committed by the driver of the truck from the driver, owner and the insurer. original opponent nos. 1 and 2 driver and the insured raised common defence by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 04 2018 (HC)

Smt. Krishna Gupta vs.vipin Kumar & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... petitioner herein had thus implicitly and admittedly paid rent to the petitioner of the eviction petition qua the tenanted premises, in term of section 116 of the indian evidence act, 1872 which provides as follows: 116. estoppel of tenant; and of licensee of person in possession. no tenant of immovable property, or person claiming through such tenant ..... petition against the rent tendered by the respondent to the eviction petition with respect to the premises in question in terms of section 116 of the indian evidence act, 1872, the respondent to the eviction petition was estopped from r.c. rev4722018 page 9 of 20 denying the title of the petitioner over the premises ..... mislead learned trial court to pass an eviction order?. vi. whether the respondent s petition of eviction, only because it was under section 14 (1)(e) of act, claiming summary trial, can be allowed on the basis of wrong & fictitious documents?. vii. whether respondent can be permitted to secure favorable order on the basis of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 2007 (HC)

Ashok Somalal Thakkar and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3579; (2007)2GLR2114

..... under sections 148, 323, 307, 302 read with section 149 of the indian penal code as well as for the offences punishable under section 135 of the bombay police act, 1951.2. vide abovesaid judgment and order, the learned trial judge acquitted all the nine accused for the offences charged against them so far as the offences punishable under sections ..... learned trial judge erred in coming to the conclusion that only some lines in respect of injuries caused by accused nos. 1 and 3 to banesingh vajesingh could be acted upon and rest of the whole evidence of banesingh vajesingh was not trustworthy. it is submitted, therefore, that the learned trial judge ought to have come to the conclusion ..... was made by the accused no. 2 before the police sub-inspector and not before the panchas. the discovery, therefore, is hit by the provisions of the evidence act, not only that but this witness stated that all the weapons as used by all the accused, were discovered at the instance of the accused no. 2 and such .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 2007 (HC)

Atulkumar Vikaschandra Vajpai Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2008)1GLR46

..... the panchnama as a panch in respect of recovery of muddamal tamancha. we do not find any substance or merit in the said submission. according to us, one witness can act in dual capacity.27. the prosecution has thereafter examined and relied upon the evidence of p.w. 24, kishorbhai umedsinghbhai, a.s.i., exh. 79, who started the investigation ..... of evidence so complete as not to leave any reasonable ground for the conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused and must show that in all human probability the act must have been done by the accused.12. in the case of jaipal v. state of haryana : 2002crilj4703 , the supreme court has held that merely because the accused could ..... and they have been acquitted by the learned j.m.f.c, devas in the case filed against them for the offences under sections 25 and 27 of the arms act by judgment and order dated 10-2-2000. however, they have neither produced any evidence nor did they examine any witness in support of their defence.2.11. on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 2007 (TRI)

Diambel N.V. Antwerk Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2008)(124)ECC201

..... were grounds to confiscate the goods. non-imposition of the personal penalty on the appellants herein would indicate that the appellants were not knowingly concerned with the act of clearance of goods on forged licence.13. the commissioner has erred in holding that the ownership in the said goods should transfer in favour of the ..... without any offer of redemption fine. however, he refrains from imposing any penalty on the appellants herein under the provisions of section 112 of the customs act, 1962.12. when the commissioner is coming to a finding that the importer was actively and deliberately concerned with the forgery and in para 10 of ..... gold/platinum jewellery and articles thereof and the policy did not permit free import of rough diamonds. section 3(2) of the foreign trade (development and regulation act, 1992 provides that the central government may by order published in the official gazette make provisions for prohibiting, restricting or otherwise regulating, in all cases or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 2007 (HC)

Manoj Valmiki Pande Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2007)2GLR2245

..... three appeals have been convicted for the offence punishable under section 8(c) read with section 20(b)(ii) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 ('ndps act' for short) and all the accused persons have been sentenced to suffer r.i. for ten years and fine of rs. 1 lakh and in default ..... brought out from their evidence which would impeach their credibility.15. so far as the statutory provisions contained under section 42(1) of the ndps act is concerned, it deals with power of entry, search, seizure and arrest without warrant or authorization in a building, conveyance or enclosed place, between sunrise and ..... accused persons and they have repelled all those suggestions made to them with regard to the non-compliance of the statutory and mandatory provision contained under the ndps act as well as samples were not reached fsl intact in sealed condition. therefore, they withstood the test of cross-examination successfully. nothing substantial has been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 2013 (HC)

Kalai Selvi Vs. the State

Court : Chennai

..... not augur well for the future.49. this being the understanding of the government behind the enactment of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000, and the amendments effected thereto in 2006, together with the rules framed thereunder in 2007, and the data available with regard to the commission ..... juveniles and for the adjudication of certain matters relating to and disposition of delinquent juveniles. the essence of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000, and the rules framed thereunder in 2007, is restorative and not retributive, providing for rehabilitation and re-integration of children in conflict with law ..... the report of justice j.s.verma committee on ".amendments to the criminal law". and are convinced that the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000, as amended in 2006, and the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) rules, 2007, are based on sound principles recognized internationally and contained .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //