Skip to content


View - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: view Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 502 results (0.184 seconds)
Dec 19 2002 (HC)

Hotel Ridge View Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-19-2002

Reported in: 2004(1)CTLJ565(P& H); (2004)136PLR747

..... petition the court may not have even issued notice to the respondents therefore keeping in view the settled law that the court will not grant relief to those who do not ..... with para 11 a ii of the application form 11 we are further of the view that even if the petitioner s case is treated as not covered by the aforesaid .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 25 2002 (HC)

Good View Properties (P) Ltd. Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-25-2002

Reported in: 117(2005)DLT269

..... v p bhardwaj owner builder this grievance is specially being made in view of the fact that it was known to the respondent authorities ..... 52 of the act 8 i am thus of the considered view that respondent dda would have jurisdiction in respect of the land ..... admittedly construction has been carried out without any permission from dda in view of the fact that the petitioner was not issued any notice .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 06 2002 (TRI)

Sarthi Textiles Vs. Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-06-2002

Reported in: (2002)(146)ELT69Tri(Mum.)bai

..... before us and on perusal of the decisions cited before us we are of the view that our earlier order requires to be modified we therefore modify our stay order by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 2002 (TRI)

Rubco Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2002

Reported in: (2002)(142)ELT387TriDel

..... are required in textile industries as an essential part of textile machine or machinery in view of the above chapter note and the decision of the tribunal we find prima fade .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 2002 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. Surya Roshni

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2002

Reported in: (2002)(143)ELT124TriDel

..... modvat credit and utilise the same for purpose of payment of duty on waste this view is supported by the clarification given by the cbec referred to above though that clarification .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 2002 (TRI)

Larsen and Toubro Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-08-2002

Reported in: (2003)(155)ELT624Tri(Mum.)bai

..... manufacturing activity which the applicant undertook that the scrap has emerged on this prima facie view we waive deposit of the duty demanded and penalty imposed and stay their recovery

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 2002 (TRI)

Cc Vs. Dilip Kumar and Co.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2002

Reported in: (2002)(82)ECC210

..... in filling the appeal under section 35 c of the central excise act 3 in view of the above decision of the hon ble supreme court we find no merit in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 2002 (TRI)

Radha Govind Lashkari Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Jaipur

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2002

Reported in: (2002)LC85Tri(Delhi)

..... be confiscated or not which was not the case before the criminal court 12 in view of the above analysis we find no merit in the present appeals all the appeals .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 06 2002 (TRI)

Smithkline Beecham Asia Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Mar-06-2002

Reported in: (2002)(146)ELT307Tri(Bang.)

..... the said letter was neither an order of adjudication nor an appealable order in the view we have taken these two appeals are dismissed as not maintainable

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 2002 (TRI)

Cce Vs. Haryana Sheet Glass Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-11-2002

Reported in: (2002)(105)LC489Tri(Delhi)

..... relay electric goods hr fuses acb 2500ac ed c pac and motor avs in my view all these items are covered in favour of the respondents by the ratio of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //