User - Judgment Search Results

Highway Users' Centres (i) Ltd. Vs. Securities And Exchange Board Of ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2005)60SCL164SAT

1 the appeal is taken up with the consent of parties this appeal is directed against the impugned order dated...

Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Hiton Roulunds Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (2005)97TTJ(Delhi)479

..... per cent of the paid up equity capital of the user 1 the user hereby acknowledges and confirms that the proprietor has at all ..... 1993 hereinafter first agreement entered into between the proprietor and the user the user has a right to use the trade mark hilton either ..... hereinafter ifu and the parties thereto have formed and established the user i e the assessee as joint venture and they have subscribed .....

Ponds (India) Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [2006]146STC556(Kar)

..... 48 of the trade and merchandise marks act provides for registered users a person other than the registered proprietor of a trade mark ..... the provisions relating to registration of a person as a registered user are contained in sections 48 to 52 of the trade marks ..... limitations specified in the agreement between the registered owner and registered user therefore the use of the trade mark or brand name can .....

Vidyawati Gupta and ors. Vs. Bhakti Hari Nayak and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR2004Cal258

..... restraining the defendants their servants and agents from interfering with the plaintiffs possession occupation and user of the front portion of the ground floor of the said premises purchased by several ..... the northern side passage where the said accident had taken place remained closed to the users of the building according to the recommendation of the pr nevertheless the committee reiterates the .....

Dr. Sanjay G. Khemuka Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR2004Bom245; 2004(3)ALLMR687

..... dispensary nursing home clinic hospitals by the occupants without obtaining permission for change of permitted user within three months from today and submit the action taken report in the form of ..... dispensaries nursing homes clinics hospitals by the occupants without obtaining permission for change of permitted user within three months from the date of order and submit an action taken report in .....

Aggarwal Sweet Palace and Others Vs. Assistant Registrar of Trade Mark ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... in matter of section 9 the applicant has filed evidence of user since 1 6 84 which is sufficient for registration and ..... respondent he further contended that the applicants have not substantiated their user a claimed since 1984 and therefore the impugned mark does ..... the mark being registered it is enough to conclude that the user was tainted with dishonesty and accordingly the appellants are not .....

Sudarsan Trading Co. Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks and Another

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... for removal of appellant opponent s mark from the register on the basis of non user learned assistant registrar has put reliance upon this pending rectification application and has mentioned in ..... wherein the assistant registrar has on the basis of the evidence allowed the honest concurrent user second respondent filed additional evidence wherein he has submitted that the appellant has leased its .....

Khushi Ram Behari Lal Vs. New Bharat Rice Mills

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... counsel for the petitioner claimed that the respondent is not the prior user of the mark and for that reason it should be expunged from ..... that the crux of his argument is that he is the prior user he drew our attention to the suits pending against the petitioner being ..... date in his pleadings however in arguments before us he claimed his user from 1 1 1978 for which he did not submit any cogent .....

Ch. Raghvendra Singh Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)1SOT83(Delhi)

..... employer would have the right of restitution tot such unauthorized user the assessees counsel however did not make reference to this ..... an independent transaction furthermore no dispute of authorized or unauthorized user can be created at this stage the facility of the ..... was incurring loss in maintaining that facility here the entire user of swimming pool was for personal benefit and no official .....

Jagdish Chand Vs. Surinder Kumar

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2005)139PLR509

..... switching to the sale of stationery items was not change of user warranting ejectment of the tenant respondent 4 the appellate authority however ..... examined in detail the whole evidence with regard to change of user it also referred to the judgments of the supreme court in ..... interference of this court 8 the findings on the change of user are that there is no machinery installed in the demised shop .....