Skip to content


User - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: user Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 305 results (0.017 seconds)
Jul 18 2000 (HC)

Margam Anjaneyulu, President, Water Users Association Vs. Superintendi ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-18-2000

Reported in: 2002(5)ALT206

..... and district 2 the petitioner is the president of the water users association komtoor village in komtoor village there is a tank by ..... a locally elected body operating for the benefit of the water users is per se irrational 5 in the considered view of this ..... competitive bidding procedure any not by awarding exclusively to the water users association it is settled principle of law that the court will .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 31 2000 (HC)

Aare Village Gram Panchayat Vs. President, Aare Village Water Users As ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Aug-31-2000

Reported in: 2001(2)ALT174

..... first respondent herein who was elected as president of the water users association aare village along with the assistance of the 3rd respondent ..... in respect of the tanks and assisting the aare village water users association which was formed under g o ms no 541 ..... is further submitted that even prior to formation of the water users association the tank was under the control of the irrigation department .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 25 2000 (SC)

State of Karnataka Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-25-2000

Reported in: AIR2001SC1560; JT2000(6)SC1; 1999(4)SCALE332; (2000)9SCC572

..... any submergence is caused in any other state by such user then the user becomes in consistent with any order of the tribunal ..... conceive that any state will force ahead with its project concerning user of water in respect of inter state reservoir without getting ..... facilities of better utilisation whereas water is scarce and limited its users are numbers and ever increasing with the development in the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 12 2000 (HC)

Peshawar Soap and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. M/S. Godrej Soaps Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-12-2000

Reported in: 2001IIAD(Delhi)452; 90(2001)DLT289; 2001(58)DRJ170

..... convenience ought not to be upset d acquiescence would also lend legal legitimacy to exclusive user of a descriptive word which if contemporaneously challenged would call for cancellation e use of ..... been averred by the plaintiff that the mark kesh nikhar or nikhar has by long user lost its primary signification and acquired a secondary signification which is particularly and singularly indicative .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 10 2000 (TRI)

Balmer Lawrie and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-10-2000

Reported in: (2000)LC893Tri(Delhi)

..... was given in order to avoid any genuine difficulty to the end user of the inputs having purchased the same under the invoices issued ..... and enforcement 11 therefore for claiming the modvat credit the end user of the goods covered by the invoices has to satisfy the ..... changed hands and reached in the factory premises of the end user or not to eliminate such transactions from the commercial scene the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 08 2000 (SC)

K.S. Bhoopathy and Others Vs. Kokila and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-08-2000

Reported in: 2000(3)ALT58(SC); 2001(49)BLJR839; 2000(3)CTC558; JT2000(6)SC272; RLW2001(1)SC107; 2000(4)SCALE640; (2000)5SCC458

..... for further injunction restraining them from disturbing the plaintiffs exclusive user of the pathway lying between the properties of the ..... act as a nuisance and will seriously prejudice the plaintiffs user of their property on which they have constructed a ..... injunction permanently restraining the defendants from disturbing their right of user of the property from the facts an circumstances of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 02 2000 (HC)

Mohd. RiazuddIn and Others Vs. Govt. of A.P. and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-02-2000

Reported in: 2000(6)ALD756; 2000(6)ALT239

..... property does not necessarily show that the property is endowed by user certain lands or buildings may become wakf as cemeteries mosques ..... me settlement record showed that the land has become wakf by user lord macnaghten delivered the judgment of the judicial committee section ..... inamdar on the plot therefore the principle of wakf by user coming into existence does not apply to this case especially .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 03 2000 (HC)

Nirmala Das and ors Vs. Panchanan Banerjee and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-03-2000

Reported in: AIR2001Cal37,(2001)2CALLT154(HC)

..... holding the plaintiffs having failed to prove the case of uninterrupted user is wholly erroneous on the point of law there is ..... has concurrently found that the plaintiffs have failed to prove uninterrupted user for about 20 years it has been further found by ..... used the suit passage from 1964 to 1984 so factum of user coupled with the above documentary evidence unmistakably substantiate the easement by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 24 2000 (HC)

Birla Cement Works and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Feb-24-2000

Reported in: AIR2000Raj251; 2001(4)WLC500

..... not less than one month this provision makes consideration of actual user a relevant factor in determination of tax amount to be recovered ..... roads for use of public roads maintained by it by the users thereof the court while examining challenge to validity of such taxation ..... with the amended provisions of the orissa act where the actual user did not exclude the dumpers in question before the court from .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 21 2000 (HC)

Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd., Calcutta Vs. Surender Oil and Dal Mills ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-21-2000

Reported in: 2001(1)ALT253

..... otherwise the same rights as against other persons not being registered users using by way of permitted use as he would have if ..... some person having the right either as proprietor or as registered user to use the mark whether with or without any indication of ..... by the defendant this cannot be considered to be a honest concurrent user by the defendant of the above said symbol therefore the defendant .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //