Skip to content


Try - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: try Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 602 results (0.147 seconds)
Dec 18 2002 (HC)

The Tamil Nadu Co-operative Milk Producers' Federation Ltd. Vs. the St ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-18-2002

Reported in: 2003(27)PTC322(Mad); [2005]141STC277(Mad)

ordern v balasubramanian j 1 the petitioner is a government of tamil nadu undertaking engaged in the business of vending...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 24 2002 (HC)

Amar Nath Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Oct-24-2002

Reported in: 2003CriLJ2003

the offence the court can take cognizance against them and try them along with the other accused but we would hasten

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 16 2002 (HC)

Bharatkumar Amratlal Shah and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Mar-16-2002

Reported in: (2002)3GLR816

..... provided for some wide powers to a magistrate who is trying the criminal case filed for the offence punishable under this ..... metropolitan magistrate or the judicial magistrate of the first class shall try any offence under said act and so assistant sessions judge ..... positive finding that the court of judicial magistrate is incompetent to try the offence punishable under the act having penalty of life .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 27 2002 (HC)

Raginiben Gunvantsinh Tank Vs. Gunvantlal Keshavlal Tank and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-27-2002

Reported in: I(2004)DMC476; (2003)3GLR2027

..... of her streedhan property will also have territorial jurisdiction to try offence of criminal breach of trust in this cited case ..... is required to be returned will also have territorial jurisdiction to try the offence section 6 of dowry prohibition act provides that ..... the dishonest misappropriation of entrusted property was done had jurisdiction to try the mater and not the place of marriage where she .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 17 2002 (HC)

Raj Ambarish Sen Alias Ambarish Sen Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-17-2002

Reported in: 2003CriLJ3830

..... from the one in which the ordinary adult accused persons are tried under section 24 while section 33 goes a step further in ..... is taking the evidence of the juvenile delinquent because it is trying the other accused persons of the case and evidence is being ..... make it fully clear that a magistrate though not empowered to try a juvenile delinquent need not forward that juvenile to any competent .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 27 2002 (TRI)

K.R. Balachandran Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Aug-27-2002

Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC420

1 both these appeals arise from a common order in original no 3 2001 dated 31 8 2001 by which...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 15 2002 (HC)

Shah Jolly Chandravadan and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Jul-15-2002

Reported in: (2003)2GLR1190

anjaria some of the ad hoc appointees presently serving are trying to get advantage of this first affidavit and have prayed

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 09 2002 (HC)

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Surat Singh and Etc. Etc.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-09-2002

Reported in: 2003CriLJ386

orderr l khurana j 1 the above noted 14 revision petitions have been taken up by this court in exercise...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 12 2002 (HC)

Santa Devi and ors. Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-12-2002

Reported in: 99(2002)DLT604; II(2002)DMC512

..... petition is whether the metropolitan magistrate in delhi had jurisdiction to try these petitioners in this case the counsel for the petitioner ..... provided that every offence shall ordinarily be enquired into and tried by a court within whose local jurisdiction it was committed ..... and summon the petitioners to stand trial before him and try the case the petition is accordingly dismissed in limini the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 29 2002 (SC)

Konda Lakshmana Bapuji Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-29-2002

Reported in: AIR2002SC1012; 2002(2)ALD56(SC); JT2002(2)SC253; 2002(1)SCALE584; (2002)3SCC258; [2002]1SCR651

..... application made by any person officer orauthority take cognizance of and try every case arising out of any alleged act of land grabbing ..... that if on an applicationfrom an interested person to withdraw and try a case pending before any special tribunal the special court is ..... the same parties in substance section 11 bars a court from trying any suit in which the matter directly and substantially in issue .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //