Try - Judgment Search Results

Ananda Shetty and Another Vs. Aithu Poojary and Others

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1999(1)ALD(Cri)260; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)390; 1999(2)KarLJ455

..... that merely because the case which the magistrate is competent to try and which he can adequately punish is connected with other ..... sentence but a statutory prohibition comes in preventing the magistrate from trying the case e g 306 5xaxi under which where cognizance ..... because he has taken into consideration the purpose and object of trying both the cases together by the same court as indicated above .....

Mahabir Prasad Jalan and ors. Vs. Bajrang Prasad Jalan and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [2000]102CompCas81(Cal),(1999)2CompLJ72(Cal)

..... be maintainable 42 unless the power to take cognizance and try an offence is expressly conferred under special statute the provision ..... force regulating the manner or place of investigating inquiring into trying or otherwise dealing with such offences 26 courts by which ..... 526 of the criminal procedure code it would not have jurisdiction to try the accused merely on an application made under section 85 .....

Sailesh Jaiswal Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1998(2)ALD(Cri)924,(1998)2CALLT423(HC),1998(2)CHN81

..... a larger principle of criminal administration of justice the court having jurisdiction to enquire and try the offence should alone be competent to entertain such application the jurisdiction for grant of ..... magistrate under section 167 no matter whether such nearest magistrate has the territorial jurisdiction to try the case or not evidently all these provisions are infested with the insignia of .....

Microland Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Reported in: (1998)67ITD446(Bang.)

justice thus in our view if the cit does not try to improve upon the proposed assessment order in a very

Eskayef Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

..... preference to another decision constituted by two judges sri dastur also tried to argue that the so called office note was not ..... assessment order had already been passed by the assessing officer he tried to find out certain differences in the typed characters of ..... this particular case are required to be taken into consideration while trying to understand the decision of the supreme court in arriving .....

Monterey Vs. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.

Court: US Supreme Court

monterey v del monte dunes at monterey ltd 526 u s 687 1998 october term 1998 syllabus city of monterey...

Feltner Vs. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

that the copyright act of 1790 changed the practice of trying copyright actions for damages in courts of law before juries

Rafiq Khan and anr. Vs. Smt. Jamila Bee and anr.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: I(1999)DMC448

of the case the proper procedure would have been to try both the cases together i e the case arising on

Harbans Singh Alias Lovely Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 1999CriLJ3071

..... book the magisterial courts ceased to have jurisdiction or power to try any offence committed under the act even if the punishment ..... during the transitional period offences committed under the act would be tried by the court of session alone notwithstanding anything to the ..... under section 36 that court alone would have jurisdiction to try the offences under the act save and except those in .....

Mohinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1998VIIAD(SC)517; AIR1999SC211; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)804; 1999CriLJ263; 1998(4)Crimes72(SC); JT1998(7)SC187; RLW1999(2)SC196; 1998(5)SCALE599; (1998)7SCC390; 1999(1)LC36(SC)

..... counsel for the appellant was that the appellant could not have been tried again for possession of sten gun and 12 live cartridges as in ..... case no 5 95 the appellant along with 4 other accused was tried for the offences punishable under sections 399 and 402 ipc and ..... for different offences and therefore it was open to the designated court trying special sessions case no 6 95 to decide the same on .....