Trusts Act - Judgment Search Results

Adarsh Parthan vs the Local Level Committee (Under the National Trust ...

Court: Kerala

GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR, PIN - 680505 BY ADV ANJANA KANNATH RESPONDENTS :-1 THE LOCAL LEVEL COMMITTEE (UNDER THE NATIONAL TRUST ACT), ERNAKULAM, R EPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN- DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682030 2 THE CHAIRMAN LOCAL

Noorunniza vs the Local Level Committee (Under the National Trust Act) ...

Court: Kerala

PIN - 690539 BY ADVS. G.HARIKUMAR (GOPINATHAN NAIR) AKHIL SURESH RESPONDENT/S:1 THE LOCAL LEVEL COMMITTEE (UNDER THE NATIONAL TRUST ACT) KOLLAM REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN- DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM, PIN - 691013 2 THE CHAIRMAN LOCAL LEVEL

The Mahal Masjid Trust, a Public Trust, Duly Registered Under Bombay P ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(111)BomLR1220

J.H. Bhatia, J.1. Petitioner is a registered public trust and petitioner No. 2 is its Secretary. Respondent No. 2 Abdul Wahab was a tenant in occupation of … right of the landlord to determine the tenancy by giving notice under the provisions of Transfer of Property Act. Such a landlord who seeks to exercise the right under that section has to satisfy the Rent Controller

Bhakti Vedanta Book Trust a Trust Registered Under the Bombay Public T ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(4)BomCR689; 2009(111)BomLR1951; 2009(4)MhLj144

Royal Education Society, the petitioner gave purchase notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (for short 'MRTP Act'). This notice was give on 25th July, 2007. The respondent Corporation informed the

Mrs. Vinaya L. Pai Vs. South Indian Education Society, a Society regis ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005(4)BomCR459; 2006(2)MhLj264

3 educational pattern.3. On rendering surplus they should have been absorbed in the junior college of the same management.4. they should have been appointed to the post of a Lecturer in the senior college managed by the

Vidya Prasarak Mandal a Public Trust Duly Registered Under the Public ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(3)ALLMR705; (2008)110BOMLR1308; 2008(5)MhLj477

D.K. Deshmukh, J.1. The petitioner is a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act. According to the petitioner, it has started Arts, Commerce and Science

Fancy Rehabilitation Trust, a Trust Registered Under Provisions of Bom ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2007)ILLJ1073Bom

J.1. Rule. Heard forthwith.2. Petitioner No. 1 is a Trust, registered under the provisions of the Bombay Public Trusts Act. Petitioners activities commenced in 1974 and after 1990 the petitioners activities are in the field of rehabilitation of

Smt. Janabai Govindrao Korche and Vs. Women's Education Society, A pub ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(111)BomLR3715

Civil Judge.3. The facts giving rise to these writ petitions are as follows The respondent/plaintiff is a Public Trust. It runs a school known as Abhyankar Kanya Shala. One Govindrao Korche, Deoji Kathane and Panjabrao Bhande - … court had no jurisdiction to entertain suit by virtue of provisions of Section 22 of the Maharashtra Rent Act. He submits that suit ought to have been filed before the competent authority. Section 22 reads as follows

Tulsiram Rangwala Trust a Trust Registered Under the Bombay Public Tru ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(1)ALLMR9; 2007(1)BomCR122; 2007(1)MhLj561

his son Shri Tulsiram Nathumal, who in turn assigned his rights to the present petitioner No. 1-Tulsiram Rangwala Trust with some restrictive clauses. On 15.8.1999 a Sony Show Room was housed in the said premises which is … the office of the Collector, Mumbai called upon the petitioners to show cause as to why the necessary action should not be taken for breach of conditions of lease deed in respect of the Shalimar building. The

Sks Logistics (i) Limited a Company Incorporated Under the Provisions ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(6)BomCR14; (2008)110BOMLR3445

filing reply. As per the averments in the reply, under the provisions of Section 42 the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), as amended, the Board of Trustees of respondent No. 1 is