Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade unions act 1926 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: old Page 3 of about 5,354 results (0.231 seconds)

Hari Krishna Kanoi and anr. Vs. Appropriate Authority and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1994]207ITR743(Cal)

..... the appropriate authority was set aside on a ground similar to that in the case of tanvi trading and credits p. ltd. : [1991]188itr623(delhi) . this decision is dated december 14, 1990, and is subsequent to the order passed in union of india v. c.b. gautam.29. a learned single judge of the madras high ..... concept of a person aggrieved under article 226 with 'person interested' under section 269a(g). the petitioners have relied upon the meaning of 'person interested' in the land acquisition act, 1894, as well as in the decisions of the supreme court in sunderlal v. paramsukhdas, : [1968]1scr362 and himalaya tiles and marble (p.) ltd. v. francis ..... consideration for the transfer. 79. the reasoning of the appropriate authority proceeds upon a misconception of the law on the consideration. section 2(d) of the contract act, 1872, which defines 'consideration', does not require that the benefit of the action must go directly to the transferor. consideration may also involve a benefit being .....

Survodaya Mills Workers Union Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1994Kant256; ILR1994KAR687

..... and a writ petition is pending before this court in that behalf. it is stated that the 6th respondent has entered into a settlement with another trade union, which is also a subject matter in another writ petition. it is also not in dispute that the 6th respondent has constructed certain quarters and in ..... the public interest. in this context, sri k. subbarao, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is a recognised and registered trade union exposing the cause of the workmen in the 6th respondent industry. that, in the year 1984 immediately after election a charter of demands was submitted to the ..... the act, opposed to public policy and injuries to public interest.17. in this context, sri k. subba rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, derives support from the following decisions- : (1983)illj45sc .in fertilizer corporation kamagar union (regd.) sindri v. union of india, air 1981 sc 344 : (1980 lab ic 1367), the question whether the trade union .....

Shivaji Ramsing Rajput and ors. Vs. Ravalgaon Sugar Farm Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1995(70)FLR744]; (1996)ILLJ42Bom

..... 2.5.1986 made in complaints (ulp) nos. 212 to 226 of 1984 under the provisions of the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). 2. the relevant facts required for disposal of this writ petition are : the first respondent is an industrial establishment covered by ..... other 12 employees were employed as non-seasonal permanent employees. the petitioners moved their complaints by invoking items 5, 6 and 9 of schedule iv of the act and alleged that giving the status of non-seasonal permanent employees to the other 12 junior employees situated on equal footing, for no good reason, was an ..... appears to have dismissed the complaints on the ground that the petitioners being seasonal permanent employees were not employees under section 3(13) of the bombay relations act. without expressing any view on the merits of the case as to the unfair labour practice made out in the complaints of the petitioners, i am .....

Asbestos Kamgar Union Vs. Asbestos Janata Mazdoor Union and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1995)IILLJ1103MP; 1995(0)MPLJ171

..... .4. after hearing counsel, this court is of the opinion, that the petition has no merit for reasons to follow. chapter iii of the act deals with the recognition of representative unions and associations of employers. any registered trade union desirous of its recognition as a representative union in respect of any industry in a local area, has to apply under section 13 of the ..... . dubey, j.1. petitioner is a registered trade union which has been organised as a representative union under section 13 of the m.p. industrial relations act, 1960 (for short the 'act') for the employees in respect of the industry eternit everest ltd., kymore. the respondent no-1 in form e of rule 17 and section 17 of the act applied before the registrar of representative .....

Sangali Dist. Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Tukaram Atmaram Jadha ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1997)IIILLJ1247Bom

..... 1986 informing him that he could defend himself or be represented by an employee of the petitioner bank or by an office bearer of the representative union under the act and by none else. the domestic enquiry thereafter proceeded and concluded. the first respondent was found guilty of the charges and removed from service. ..... not apply to the undertaking of the petitioner. thus, there can be no 'recognised union' within the meaning of chapter iii of the said act. consequently, all unions, including the representative union under b.i.r. act, would be unions 'other than recognized unions' as far as the industrial undertaking of the petitioner is concerned. consequently, the first ..... permit the first respondent to be represented in the domestic enquiry by an authorised office-bearer of the general workers union was a contravention of the right under section 22(ii) of the mrtu & pulp act, 1971 and, therefore, the enquiry was bad in law. having arrived at this conclusion, though the industrial .....

Ranchhodbhai Galabhai Patel and anr. Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1996)131CTR(Guj)52; [1996]219ITR427(Guj)

..... to evade tax which is sine qua non for the exercise of power of pre-emptive purchase under s. 269ud(1a) of the act as held by the supreme court in the case of c. b. gautam vs . union of india & ors. : [1993]199itr530(sc) . 6. on the other hand mr. thakore, learned standing counsel for the revenue, relied ..... agreement between the parties was not a proper agreement as already held by the previous order dt. 19th july, 1989. in the background of the aforesaid facts, tanvi trading filed a writ petition before delhi high court and challenged the orders of the appropriate authority. the learned counsel appearing for the appropriate authority defended the orders on the ..... matter, the controversy appears to have been set at rest by the hon'ble supreme court, the above decision of the delhi high court in the case of tanvi trading (supra) has been affirmed by the hon'ble the supreme court. their lordships of the hon'ble supreme court while dismissing the appeal preferred by the appropriate authority .....

M.R. Patil and Another Vs. the Member, Industrial Court and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1997SC1429; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)932; 1997(3)ALLMR(SC)726; 1997(1)ALT(Cri)858; 1997(2)Crimes20(SC); JT1997(4)SC428; (1997)IILLJ417SC; 1997(3)SCALE363; (1997)4SCC545; [1997]3SC

..... that payment in terms thereof would be unjust and more favourable to the workers affiliated to the other unions, the union filed a complaint before the industrial court, amaravati under section 28(1) of the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971 ('act' for short) and, along with it, filed a petition seeking temporary relief. on that complaint, which was ..... appeal.9. to answer the questions raised in this appeal it will be pertinent to refer, at the outset, to the preamble of the act and its material provisions. the act was brought on the statute book :to provide for the recognition of trade unions for facilitating collective bargaining for certain undertakings, to state their rights and obligations; to confer certain powers on unrecognised .....

Ramanlal B. Pandya and anr. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR2573; [1998]230ITR454(KAR); [1998]230ITR454(Karn)

..... to the transfer of the immovable property for the consideration stated in the agreement. a bare perusal of the abovesaid provisions of the act indicates that the jurisdiction of the appropriate authority is only limited to either passing an order within the specified period for purchase of ..... the agreement either looked at from the interest of the vendor or the vendee. the authorities of the urban land (ceiling and regulations) act are not likely to grant permission and, therefore, the agreement entered into between the vendor and the vendee for transfer of the immovable ..... 1995]211itr10(delhi) , mrs. satwant narang vs . appropriate authority : [1991]188itr656(delhi) dwarakanath chatterjee & ors. vs . union of india & ors. : [1995]213itr470(cal) , tanvi trading and credits (p) ltd. vs . appropriate authority & ors. : [1991]188itr623(delhi) , appropriate authority & ors. vs . tanvi trading and credits (p) ltd. & ors. : [1991]191itr307(sc) , j. gala enterprises estate & investments (p) .....

Ramanlal B. Pandya and anr Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (1997)143CTR(Kar)190

..... to the transfer of the immovable property for the consideration stated in the agreement.a bare perusal of the abovesaid provisions of the act indicates that the jurisdiction of the appropriate authority is only limited to either passing an order within the specified period for purchase of ..... the agreement either looked at from the interest of the vendor or the vendee. the authorities of the urban land (ceiling and regulations) act are not likely to grant permission and, therefore, the agreement entered into between the vendor and the vendee for transfer of the immovable property ..... 1995]211itr10(delhi) , mrs. satwant narang vs . appropriate authority : [1991]188itr656(delhi) dwarakanath chatterjee & ors. vs . union of india & ors. : [1995]213itr470(cal) , tanvi trading and credits (p) ltd. vs . appropriate authority & ors. : [1991]188itr623(delhi) , appropriate authority & ors. vs . tanvi trading and credits (p) ltd. & ors. : [1991]191itr307(sc) , j. gala enterprises estate & investments (p) .....

Assam Leather Industry Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... (article 323b(3)(d)). the additional solicitor general in the delhi high court case reported in delhi high court bar association v. union of india : air1995delhi323 admitted that the act has been enacted under this provision, but admittedly, there is no provision for constituting a tribunal of recovery of debts under article ..... 95 will show that the matter establishment of tribunal is not covered by these two entries. entry 43 is with regard to incorporation, regulation and winding up trading companies, etc. does the establishment of tribunal come within the purview regulation. the word 'regulation' received judicial interpretation in a number of cases (see ..... judgment of the punjab and haryana high court- entry 43 in list i deals with the following things : '43. incorporation, regulation and winding up of trading corporations, including banking, insurance and financial corporations but not including co-operative societies.' 87. entry 95 is the jurisdiction and powers of all courts, except .....