Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade unions act 1926 chapter i preliminary Court: punjab and haryana Page 3 of about 77 results (0.087 seconds)

May 18 2005 (HC)

Jatt Ram Vs. Punjab State Human Rights Commission and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2005)141PLR297

..... suggestion cannot be treated to be a decision capable of execution or enforcement.' 19. the supreme court of india in the case of n.c. dhourrdial v. union of india and ors., : air2004sc1272 held as follows:-'14. we cannot endorse the view of the commission. the commission which is a 'unique expert body' ..... any law for the time being in force for the protection of human rights and recommend measures for their effective implementation; review the factors, including act of terrorism that inhibit the enjoyment of human rights and recommend appropriate remedial measures, study treaties and other international instruments on human rights and make recommendation ..... law for the time being in force for the protection of human rights and recommend measures for their effective implementation;(e) review the factors, including acts of terrorism, that inhibit the enjoyment of human rights and recommend appropriate remedial measures;(f) study treaties and other international instruments on human rights and .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 1948 (PC)

Bashir Ahmad Vs. the Crown

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1951CriLJ1041

..... function of the state'. he says that the difference between a state & other associations such as a church, a university, a joint stock company, or a trade union, is clearly one of function.'historically', he goes on, 'the most important operations of govt. have been two, namely, war & the administration of justice. the ..... instituted & does not create that cause. in reference to judicial tribunals an appellate jurisdiction, therefore, necessarily implies that the subject matter has been already instituted & acted upon by some other ct., whose judgment or proceedings are to be revised. (s. 1761, commentaries on the constitution of the united states).it was, ..... 'chappan v. moidin kutti' ilr 22 mad 68. in the p.c. case, their lordships, repelling a contention advanced before them that under the high courts act & charter the division of jurisdiction was fourfold, ordinary original, extraordinary original, appellate, & those special matters which were the subject of special & separate provisions (e .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2003 (HC)

Paramjit Kaur and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2004)136PLR753

..... done, in view of the petitioners, by the film makers with commercial angle high on their minds. it is then pleaded that it is the duty cast upon the union of india, through secretary, ministry of information & broadcasting as also central bank of film certification, the first and second respondents herein, to see that the films made on ..... with shri b.k.dutt, sardar bhagat singh threw two bombs in the central assembly hall on 8.4.1929, where discussions for passing the public safety bill and trades disputes bill were going on. both of them raised slogans of inquilab zindabad and offered voluntary arrest. thereafter the case progressed but sardar bhagat singh refused to hire a ..... and 5c of the act of 1952 and the contention raised by learned counsel representing the parties. hon'ble supreme court while relying upon the views of vivian bose, j. in bhagwati charan shukla v. provincial government, a.i.r. 1947 nagpur 1 as also three judgments of supreme court in k.a. abbas v. union of india, a.i .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 2004 (HC)

Jaskaran Singh Brar Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2005(2)ESC1310; 2005(3)SLJ354(P& H)

..... realisation of the constitutional objectives.'14. dismantling the fake plea of locus standi invariably raised by status quoists, the apex court in fertilizer corporation kamgar union v. union of india, air 1981 sc 344, observed as under :'public interest litigation is part of the process to participate justice and standing in civil ..... in furtherance of the political responsibility cast upon it. the theory of collective responsibility makes each minister victoriously responsible to the legislative assembly for the acts of other members of the council as well. true it is that the chief minister heads them and presides over the council of ministers, neither ..... punjab police service rules, 1959 whereas the notification has 'relaxed' some of the provisions of these rules, what the council of ministers had approved was an act of subordinate legislation by invoking the powers under article 309 of the constitution which is of statutory in character. however, the notification dated january 23, 2004 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 18 2010 (HC)

Keshav Kaushik Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Haryana and ors. Etc. Etc.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... be entered the names and addresses of-(a) all persons who were entered as advocates on the roll of any high court under the indian bar councils act, 1926 (38 of 1926), immediately before the appointed day 3*[including persons, being citizens of india, who before the 15th day of august, 1947, were enrolled as advocates under ..... appointment as additional district and sessions judges. we have formulated this opinion on account of the following circumstances: (i)they were in regular government service with the union or the state. their recruitment to the posts of deputy advocate general, assistant district attorney's/prosecutors was pursuant to their selection by the respective public service commission ..... a person who is otherwise qualified to be admitted as an advocate but is either in full or part-time service or employment or is engaged in any trade, business or profession shall not be admitted as an advocate. provided however that this rule shall not apply to- (i)any person who is a law .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 26 2015 (HC)

Serco BPO (P.) Ltd. Vs. Authority For Advance Rulings, New Delhi

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... india for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital gains and for the encouragement of mutual trade and investment) it is hereby certified that blackstone gpv capital partners mauritius v-b ltd. incorporated in mauritius on 10may 2006 is a company resident in mauritius ..... in mauritius. 27. the matter is covered in favour of the petitioner by the provisions of the income tax act, the said circulars issued under section 119 of the act and most important by the judgment of the supreme court in union of india v. azadi bachao andolan (2004) 10 scc 1 (supra). 28. the first question is ..... of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital gains and for the encouragement of mutual trade and investment. in exercise of powers conferred under section 90 of the act and 24(a) of the company (profits) surtax act, 1964, the central government directed that all the provisions of the convention would be given effect to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 1948 (PC)

Ramji Lal S/O Mahadeo Parshad Vs. Rex

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1949CriLJ271

..... singly exorcises any func- tion on the original or appellate side, he is the high court for the purposes of that function. section 108, government of india act, 1915, en-acts as follows:(1) each high court may, by its own rules, provide as it thinks fit lot the exercise, by one or more judges, or by division ..... regulating the work of the court; they do not affect the jurisdiction of the single benches or division benches constituted under the provisions of section 108, government of india act, 1915. clause 35, letters patent, also empowers the high court from time to time to make rules for delegating to any .registrar, prothonotary or master or other ..... was given to everybody within the criminal appellate jurisdiction of each high court to make an application under section 491 of the present criminal procedure code. by the criminal law amendment act, 1923, section 491 was amended and was enacted in the following terms:(1) any high court may, whenever it thinks fit, direct -(a) that a person .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2012 (HC)

Present : Mr. Rajiv Atma Ram Senior Advocate with Vs. Board of Control ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... refer to various english decisions which have held so. it will suffice to reproduce what ormond, l.j., said in norwest holst ltd. v. secretary of state for trade (1978) 3 all er 28.(at p. 227): the house of lords and this court have repeatedly emphasised that the ordinary principles of natural justice must be kept ..... of administrative efficiency and expedition. sometimes legislation itself excludes the application of the rules by express provision or by implication."46. a constitution bench in a judgment reported as union of india vs. tulsiram patel (1985) 3 scc 39.examined maxims i.e. nemo judex in causa sua; nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa; and ..... committee are part of the institution and, therefore, suffer from institutional bias. relying upon maclean vs. workers union 1929 all er 468.wherein the question posed was in respect of a tribunal entrusted with the duty to appear to act as prosecutors as well as that of judges, the court observed as under: 28. in reply, shri sundaram .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 28 2014 (HC)

Paramjit Kumar Saroya Vs. the Union of India and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... an advocate brought on the rolls to practise is, therefore, just what is conferred on him by section 14(1)(a), (b) and (c) of the bar councils act, 1926. the relevant provisions reads as follows: 14(1) an advocate shall be entitled as of right to practise : (a) subject to the provisions of sub-section (4 ..... appreciation for the assistance rendered by mr. puneet bali, senior advocate alongwith ms. divya sharma, advocate (amicus curiae), mr. o.s. batalvi, learned counsel for the union of india and mr. alok jain, learned additional advocate general for the state of punjab. a copy of this judgement be forward to the secretary, ministry of law ..... for the petitioners. mr. puneet bali, senior advocate, with ms. divya sharma, advocate (amicus curiae). mr. o.s. batalvi, central government standing counsel, for respondent no.1 union of india. mr. alok jain, additional advocate general, punjab, for respondent no.2. **** sanjay kishan kaul, c.j.(oral) the changing norms of a society raise various problems .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2012 (HC)

Dr. V.L.N. Thakur Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... any separate portion of the force to which such person belongs or is attached; as per the scheme of the itbpf act and other cognate enactments, like army act, air force act, naval act, bsf act and crpf act, a commanding officer is a unique institution, which is responsible for carrying out investigation of any allegation of commission of ..... prepare record of evidence which he could not legally order. plea accordingly is that all the subsequent proceedings are vitiated on this count. counsel appearing for union of india has joined issues with the counsel for the petitioner in this regard on this aspect. it is pointed out that the charges against the petitioner ..... or not?. 3. whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?. present : mr.rajeev anand, advocate for the petitioner. mr.gurpreet singh, senior panel counsel for uoi. **** ranjit singh, j. the petitioner, who is a veterinary surgeon and was serving as an assistant commandant in indo tibetan border police force (for short 'itbpf') .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //