Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade unions act 1926 chapter i preliminary Court: kolkata Page 3 of about 219 results (0.146 seconds)

United Arab Republic and anr. Vs. Mirza Ali Akbar Kashani

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1962Cal387

..... consent of the central government under section 86(2), whereas the immunity under the general principles of international law is subject only to section 2 of the government trading taxation act (iii of 1926) and section 86(2)(b) of the civil procedure code. it is, however, a matter for the central legislature to bring the immunity of a foreign state into ..... rulers of a former indian state a part of the immunity accorded to the 'ruler of a foreign state'. after the integration of the indian states with the union of india the rulers of former indian states have no territorial sovereignty and therefore the immunity under section 87b must he the immunity of the individual who was ..... is trading in calcutta or anywhere else in india. the question whether the suit could proceed if it did so, therefore does not arise,54. mr. mukherji next contended that a foreign state enjoys the same immunity as the domestic state enjoys and no more, and since the union of india is liable to be sued in respect .....

Sanjay Dalmia Vs. Additional Collector of C. Ex. and Customs

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1989(22)ECC16,1991(55)ELT518(Cal)

..... & ors., : air1960pat430 and he made specific reference to the observations that in view of article 19(2), the law of contempt as embodied in the contempt of courts act, 1926, according to which the punishment is limited, is not hit by article 19(1)(a). it has also been indicated that there, is no inconsistency of any kind between ..... order or decision is that of a bench to the supreme court.provided that where the order or decision is that of the court of the judicial commissioner in any union territory, such appeal shall lie to the supreme court.(2) pending any appeal, the appellate court may order that(a) the execution of the punishment or order ..... conduct of the petitioners before him and more particularly he was of the view that false statements were made on affidavits and facts were distorted, directed that the respondents union of india and their officers should be compensated with costs appropriately and as such, directed an exemplary costs assessed at rs. 10,000/- to be paid by the .....

i.T.C. Ltd. Vs. M.R.T.P. Commission and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1976]46CompCas619(Cal)

..... than the commission and do not contemplate a suo motu enquiry. it is the foundation and pre-condition of an enquiry under section 37(1) of the act that the restrictive trade practices, which could be the subject of an enquiry under that section, has to come before the commission from a source other than that of the ..... the rights of a citizen without complying with the principles of natural justice, the courts have imported the principles of natural justice or audi alterant partem into this area (vide union of india v. k.p. joseph, : [1973]2scr752 ). but in all these cases, there are certain rights of the citizens which are statutory in character and ..... the director did accede to the prayer of the petitioner. in support of his contention mr. chakraborty relied upon the following decisions of the supreme court:a.k. kraipak v. union of india, : [1970]1scr457 state of orissa v. binapani dei, : (1967)iillj266sc s.m. nandy v. state of west bengal, : [1971]3scr791 government of mysore v. j.v. .....

Ratanlal Bansilal and Others Vs. Kishorilal Goenka and Others

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1993Cal144,(1993)1CALLT162(HC),1993(1)CHN307,97CWN227

..... (supra). the appeal in mahindra ltd. (supra) was one under s. 55 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act, 1969 (mrtp act). section 55 of the mrtp act, incorporated s. 100 of the code as it obtained at the commencement of that act in 1969, i.e. before its amendment. s. 55 being an instance of legislation by incorporation is to ..... case (1988) 1 cal lj 278 (supra). for this support was drawn from the observations of a three-judge bench of the supreme court in mahindra & mahindra ltd. v. union of india, reported in : [1979]2scr1038 , to the effect that the tests in sir chunilal v. mehta & sons ltd. : air1962sc1314 (supra) apply to determine whether ..... . in mahindra & mahindra : [1979]2scr1038 the respondents raised a preliminary objection against the maintainability of the appeal on the ground that under s. 55 of the mrtp act read with amended s. 100 of the code an appeal could lie only on a substantial question of law. the supreme court, in the first instance, rejected this .....

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Sanjeevani Projects (P) Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2006(1)CHN241

..... an embargo on the conversion of water area for other use by inserting chapter iii a to introduce section 17a in the west bengal inland fisheries act, 1984 (1984 act). section 17a(1)(b) provides that 'no person shall fill up any water area including embankment or naturally or artificially depressed land holding as aforesaid ..... mr. sakti nath mukherjee, learned senior counsel, appearing on behalf of sanjeevani projects (p) ltd., was that section 4c of the west bengal land reforms act, 1955 (wblr act) has no manner of application in the present case. he had also argued that the land, being land falling on the north of the canal of ..... chief justice v. dikshitulu, : [1979]1scr26 ; jalan trading co. v. aney, : (1979)illj162sc ; mukesh v. state of madhya pradesh, : 1985(20)elt212(sc) ; laxmi kant v. union of india, : [1987]1scr383 and a.b.k. singh v. union of india, : (1981)illj209sc .16.1. in grih kalyan kendra workers' union v. union of india, : air1991sc1362 and literate association v. state of .....

Kallol Guha Thakurata and anr. Vs. Biman Basu, Chairman, Left Front an ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2005)2CALLT1(HC),2005(2)CHN330

..... for passing the said order and are inciting them to flout the order. go back slogans normally are raised against political opponents and also by way of militant trade unionism by the workers against the management. a judge cannot be equated with either of them. this very suggestion of raising of such a provocative slogan against a ..... the supreme court in rl kapur (supra) was affirmed. after setting out section 15 of the said act and discussing the law of contempt in detail with reference to the contempt of courts act, 1926 and the contempt of court act, 1952, the learned judges in paragraph 27 of the judgment made it clear that section 15 prescribes the ..... appeal cases 273, what was laid down by the apex court in 1954 in brahma prakash (supra) and hiralal (supra). the house of lords held 'any act which raised a real albeit small likelihood of interference with the administration of justice amounts to contempt of court.'68. understandably the definition of criminal contempt under section 2 .....

Bengal Steel Industries Ltd. Vs. Bank of India and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2008)4CALLT113(HC)

..... and without prejudice to the underlying assertion that it was unnecessary to exercise such right in view of the protection that the third defendant was entitled to under the 1956 act. the choice of the expressions 'existing laws' and 'monthly tenant' by the third defendant's advocate leaves little room for any alternative interpretation.43. it is more ..... and second defendants argue that since the deed of 1972 provided for a renewed lease upon the expiry of the original, the proviso to section 3(2) of the 1956 act would exclude any other possibility.19. the plaintiff insists that notwithstanding the use of the word 'renewal' in the relevant clause, it merely implied extension. the submission is ..... to emphasise on the status of the lessee upon no fresh lease being executed or registered upon renewal. a decision reported at 2007 (2) chn 303 (indo europa trading co. pvt. ltd. v. anil poddar and ors.) is placed for the principle that a lessee holding over is entitled to protection under the rent .....

Arunava Ghosh and Others Vs. Bar Council of West Bengal and Others

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1996Cal331

..... lawyers and for the purpose of maintaining high standard in the profession and the weapon of strike or adoption of any other similar trade union like activities is ultra viresthe letter, spirit and scheme of the advocates act 1961 and the role of the advocates.27. it has been further contended by mr. pal that the interest of the ..... for such period it deems fit; by removing the name of the advocates from the said roll of advocates.60. an examination of the bar counci! act 1926 and the advocates act 1961 will clearly indicate that the state bar council has no power or jurisdiction to take away the right of an advocate to practice as of right ..... and, therefore to practise legal profession is guaranteed art. 19(1)(g) of the constitution and their right to practice under section 14 of the indian bar council act, 1926 is subject only to the restriction laid down therein which are regulatory measures within the meaning of reasonable restriction under art. 19(b) of the constitution of india. .....

Manju Banerjee and ors. Vs. Debabrata Pal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2006)1CALLT87(HC)

..... l. chandra kumar v. union of india.3. no other controversy of the case was urged before us in this matter.4. in order to appreciate the nature of the question involved in this ..... construed as a reference to the advocate general of the state.7. from the aforesaid statutory dispensation, it is clear that lrtt has been created under the said act. the said act has been enacted pursuant to the provisions of the constitution. the constitution itself provides that such a tribunal may have powers including the power to punish for contempt. ..... point on which the matter was argued before this court was whether the order of lrtt by which it refused to exercise its jurisdiction under the contempt of courts act can be assailed before this court under article 226 of the constitution of india in view of the constitution bench judgment of the supreme court in the case of .....

Coal India Limited Versu Anadian Commercial Corporation

Court : Kolkata

..... the arbitral proceedings are concluded; another supreme court pronouncement on the applicability of part i of the 1996 act to arbitrations where the place of arbitration is not in india reported at (2002) 4 scc 105 (bhatia international v. bulk trading s.a.); and, a judgment reported at air 2003 guj 145 (nirma ltd v. lurgi energie und ..... in such circumstances, there will be no question of applicability of section 11(6) of the act and the appointment of arbitrator in terms of that provision. in the judgment reported at (2011) 6 scc 161 (videocon industries ltd v. union of india), the supreme court overturned the delhi high court view that it had the authority to ..... receive a petition under section 9 of the 1996 act for a declaration that a particular venue was the contractual and juridical seat of arbitration with .....