Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade unions act 1926 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: recent Court: kolkata Page 1 of about 219 results (0.077 seconds)

Raj Kumar Kishorepuria Vs. General Manager, Securities and Exchange Bo ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : IV(2005)BC538,[2005]127CompCas18(Cal),(2005)4CompLJ525(Cal),[2005]63SCL1(Cal)

..... cause why proceedings should not be initiated against him under the securities and exchange board of india act, 1992, section 11b, read with the securities and exchange board of india (prohibition of fraudulent and unfair trade practices relating to securities market) regulations, 1995, regulation 12, and the securities and exchange board of ..... petitioner, the board would be empowered to take action in terms of regulation 11 of the new regulations. she refers me to passages from treatise and the decisions in union of india and anr. v. g.m. kokil and ors. : (1984)iillj20sc , chandravarkar sita ratna rao v ashalata s. guram : [1986]3scr866 , ..... contains regulations 1 and 2 dealing with short title and commencement, and definitions respectively. the second chapter, with the heading 'prohibition of fraudulent and unfair trade practices relating to the securities market', again has only two regulations (regulations 3 and 4). while regulation 3 enumerates what a person dealing in securities shall .....

Hari Krishna Kanoi and anr. Vs. Appropriate Authority and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1994]207ITR743(Cal)

..... the appropriate authority was set aside on a ground similar to that in the case of tanvi trading and credits p. ltd. : [1991]188itr623(delhi) . this decision is dated december 14, 1990, and is subsequent to the order passed in union of india v. c.b. gautam.29. a learned single judge of the madras high ..... concept of a person aggrieved under article 226 with 'person interested' under section 269a(g). the petitioners have relied upon the meaning of 'person interested' in the land acquisition act, 1894, as well as in the decisions of the supreme court in sunderlal v. paramsukhdas, : [1968]1scr362 and himalaya tiles and marble (p.) ltd. v. francis ..... consideration for the transfer. 79. the reasoning of the appropriate authority proceeds upon a misconception of the law on the consideration. section 2(d) of the contract act, 1872, which defines 'consideration', does not require that the benefit of the action must go directly to the transferor. consideration may also involve a benefit being .....

Lindsay International Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Laxmi Niwas Mittal and Or ...

Court : Kolkata

..... and doing an act not wrongful in so far as he is concerned but harming a third party by use of illegal means directed against that third party . (per lord watson in allen v. flood, (1898) a.c.1 at96) in this decision, atypical of its time, upholding the right of a trade union official to ..... persuade workers not to work when he procured no breach of their contracts, the line was drawn between persuading a person not to make a contract and persuading a person to break an existing contract, the former being lawful, the latter unlawful. so, it later became the leading heresy to aver that malicious interference with another s trade ..... house of lords comprehensively reviewed these torts, concluding that they were separate causes of action, with separate and distinct requirements: ...it is time for the unnatural union between the lumley v. gye tort and the tort of causing loss by unlawful means to be dissolved . the case establishing liability for inducing breach of contract .....

Sesa International Limited Vs. Avani Projects and Infrastructure Limit ...

Court : Kolkata

..... hamlets london borough council reported at (1976) 1 wlr852: (1976) 3 all er462and the decision of the hon ble supreme court in new horizons limited & anr. versus union of india & ors.reported at (1995) 1 scc478in support of the aforesaid submission. it is submitted that the court having due regard to the fact can see through ..... which is qualitatively different to that of his co-partners. it is submitted that once under the jda, the said loan was treated as a stock in trade none of the parties can resile from it and the said property is required to be attached more so when the fraudulent intent of the judgment-debtors are ..... sufficient particulars.(anand prasad agarwalla v. tarkerhwar prasad, (2001) 5 scc568. however, injunction. there is a distinction between the attachment and according to dictionary meaning, attachment means act of attaching , state of being attached . in law, it is seizure of property or person by legal authority, especially seizure of defendant s property to prevent its .....

Angelo Brothers Ltd. (in Liqn) Vs. Bennett, Coleman and Co. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

..... crl.) no.11 of 1990 decided by the supreme court on 23rd july 2014]. (iii) delhi development authority v. skipper construction company (p) ltd. [air1996sc20051)]. and (iv) union of india & ors. v. ramesh gandhi [(2012)1 scc476. mr. khosla also wants to equate the jurisdiction of this court in entertaining the application of hit similar to that ..... to be recalled and the company should be allowed to function in normal course through its board of directors. the creditor-applicant in that proceeding is one r.k. trading & co., but at present no one is representing it in c.p. 90 of 1983. that proceeding was instituted on or about 23rd february 1983. one ..... in liquidation and the official liquidator not having brought any action hit, as a contributory should be permitted to agitate the grievance of abl, and i should act on the information furnished by the applicants to invalidate the decree upon conducting enquiry suo motu. mr. khosla wants this court to exercise jurisdiction under article 215 of .....

Jaldhi Overseas Pte Ltd. Vs. Bhushan Power and Steel Limited

Court : Kolkata

..... notarial attestation on the power of attorney has been duly and validly done. mr.chatterjee, learned senior counsel has relied upon a division bench judgment in union of india versus budhlani engineering pvt.ltd.reported at (2008) 3 chn661 for the proposition that in the even this court takes a contrary view as ..... parties authority to receive evidence; (b) the commanding officer of any military, naval, or air force station or ship occupied by the armed forces of the union, provided that the oath or affirmation is administered within the limits of the station. (2) without prejudice to the powers conferred by sub-section (1) ..... without this reciprocity and mutual respect the whole system and rational of the notarial acts would break down and would seriously affect commercial transactions throughout the world and their due administration by courts of law in different countries and jeopardise international trade and commerce and administration of justice. it is precisely to provide facilities of .....

Spml Infra Ltd. Vs. South Bihar Power Distribution Co. Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... would not absolutely oust the jurisdiction of the court and, therefore, would not be void against public policy and would not violate sections 23 and 28 of the contract act. the question then is whether it can be construed to have excluded the jurisdiction of the court at salem. in the clause any dispute arising out of this sale ..... which the said court otherwise does not possess in this regard. it is submitted that such jurisdiction clause is void and hit by sections 23 and 28 of the contract act. in this regard he has referred to the decision of the hon ble supreme court in interglobe aviation ltd.vs.n.satchidanand reported at 2011 (7) scc463 it ..... not approach a court . the claim was filed by the respondent before a permanent lok adalat constituted under chapter vi-a of the legal services authorities act, 1987. section 22c of the said act provides that any party to a dispute may, before the dispute is brought before any court, make an application to the permanent lok adalat for settlement .....

Om Prakash Mohta and Ors. Vs. Raj Kumar Daga and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... paras 8,9); v) the nadiad borough municipality vs. the nadiad electric co. ltd. reported at air1964guj 30; vi) deviprasad khandelwal & sons vs. the union of india reported at air1969bom 163 (para12) it is argued that every deed or document must be considered with reference to its object and the whole of its ..... absurdity. the following decisions have been relied upon by the petitioner in support of the aforesaid contention:i) national agricultural co-op. marketing federation india ltd. vs. gains trading ltd. reported at 2007 (5) scc692(para9) ii) krishna beharilal vs. gulabchand & ors. reported at 1971 (1) scc837in a meeting of the trustees held ..... bank accounts. the plaintiff alleged that all activities of the trust have effectively come to a stand still by reason of the defendants wrongful and illegal act in holding themselves out as trustees. under such circumstances, the plaintiffs have filed this originating summons formulating the following questions concerning the interpretation of the .....

Sri Tushar Kanti Roy Vs. the Eighth Industrial Tribunal, Kolkata and o ...

Court : Kolkata

..... set at rest. after exhaustively discussing different judgements the supreme court in the case of steel authority of india limited vs.- union of india and others.reported in air 200.sc 322.applied the principle to industrial adjudication having regard to the reference ..... specific performance of a contract or alternatively for damages. in the case of meng leong development pte ltd. versus jip hong trading co pte ltd., reported in (1985).all er 12.the judicial committee of the privy council held that the purchaser ..... do has been disapproved by scrutton l.j.in dexters limited vs.- hill crest oil company (bradford) limited, reported in (1926) i k b 34.saying so, in my opinion you cannot take the benefit of a judgement as being good and then ..... , 1985. an appeal by the petitioner against that decision failed. in a proceeding under section 10 of the industrial disputes act before the tribunal the petitioner denied all the charges leveled against him and challenged the order of dismissal. he prayed for .....

Tushar Kanti Roy Vs. the Eighth Industrial Tribunal and Others

Court : Kolkata

..... at rest. after exhaustively discussing different judgements the supreme court in the case of steel authority of india limited vs.- union of india and others, reported in air 2006 sc 3229 applied the principle to industrial adjudication having regard to the reference made ..... performance of a contract or alternatively for damages. in the case of meng leong development pte ltd. vs. jip hong trading co pte ltd., reported in (1985)1 all er 120 the judicial committee of the privy council held that the purchaser ..... do has been disapproved by scrutton l. j. in dexters limited vs.- hill crest oil company (bradford) limited, reported in (1926) i k b 348 saying so, in my opinion you cannot take the benefit of a judgement as being good and then ..... 1985. an appeal by the petitioner against that decision failed. in a proceeding under section 10 of the industrial disputes act before the tribunal the petitioner denied all the charges leveled against him and challenged the order of dismissal. he prayed for .....