Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade unions act 1926 chapter i preliminary Court: kolkata Page 19 of about 219 results (0.098 seconds)

State Bank of India Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in : (1983)6ITD225(Kol.)

..... difficulty and, therefore, he disallowed the claim.28. the assessee went in appeal before the commissioner (appeals) and the commissioner (appeals) following the decision in cit v. union bank of india ltd. [1976] 102 itr 270 (bom.) allowed development rebate on additions of safe deposit lockers and safe. he also allowed development rebate on the addition ..... central land mortgage bank ltd. v. cit [1968] 67 itr 89 (sc). the bank has earned dividend in course of its normal business. money is stock-in-trade of the assessee and the surplus money was invested in shares. under these circumstances, the collection charge paid by the assessee, if any, was deductible as business expenditure of ..... by a common order. the assessment for the assessment year 1972-73 was completed on 25-7-1974. a notice under section 148 of the income-tax act, 1961 ('the act') was issued upon the assessee on 7-3-1977 indicating that the ito had reason to believe, in consequence of information in his possession, that income .....

Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in : (1993)45ITD22(Kol.)

..... . it was submitted that the cases referred to related to different issues. reference was made to the decision of the supreme court in the case of union of india v.paras laminates pvt. ltd. [1990] 186 itr 722 to contend that the president had the inherent power to constitute a special bench, ..... in particular, shall disclose the following information in respect of the period covered by the account -- ... (xi) (a) the amount of income from investments, distinguishing between trade investments and other investments. (b) other income by way of interest, specifying the nature of the income. (c) the amount of income-tax deducted if the gross ..... 80j relating to unabsorbed depreciation, unabsorbed investment allowance, unabsorbed loss and unabsorbed deduction relating to tax holiday. as a consequential amendment, chapter vib of the income-tax act relating to restriction on certain deductions in the case of companies, is proposed to be omitted. these amendments will take effect from april 1, 1988, and .....

Angelo Brothers Ltd. (in Liqn) Vs. Bennett, Coleman and Co. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

..... crl.) no.11 of 1990 decided by the supreme court on 23rd july 2014]. (iii) delhi development authority v. skipper construction company (p) ltd. [air1996sc20051)]. and (iv) union of india & ors. v. ramesh gandhi [(2012)1 scc476. mr. khosla also wants to equate the jurisdiction of this court in entertaining the application of hit similar to that ..... to be recalled and the company should be allowed to function in normal course through its board of directors. the creditor-applicant in that proceeding is one r.k. trading & co., but at present no one is representing it in c.p. 90 of 1983. that proceeding was instituted on or about 23rd february 1983. one ..... in liquidation and the official liquidator not having brought any action hit, as a contributory should be permitted to agitate the grievance of abl, and i should act on the information furnished by the applicants to invalidate the decree upon conducting enquiry suo motu. mr. khosla wants this court to exercise jurisdiction under article 215 of .....

Ramgopal Ghose Vs. Dhirendra Nath Sen and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1927Cal376,101Ind.Cas.573

..... members surfers all the members should suffer with him. but it follows from this conception of family union and responsibility (apart from debts contracted by the karta or other member of the family in the course of managing a family trading business, with which i am not concerned in the. suit) that the amenability of family property ..... 142, sadusuk janaki das v. kishan pershad [1919] 46 cal. 663, hari v. sourendra : air1925cal1153 and parbati charan mukerjee v. amarendra nath bhattacharjee a.i.r. 1926 cal. 831.11. further, if the plaintiff in this suit is entitled to recover the moneys lent as. a debt contracted by noren as karta otherwise than under the promissory ..... his name is the real name of the person liable for the bill... their lordships attention was directed to sections 26, 27 and 28 of the negotiable instruments act, 1881, and the terms of those sections were contrasted with the corresponding provisions of the english statute. it is unnecessary in this connexion, to decide whether .....

Sarat Sundari Deby Vs. Ram Kinkar Rai

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1939Cal244

..... latter in 1320 (1913) and left her with the feeling that she was being cheated of her just dues. she moved from baraduari to maldah town in october 1926 (kartic 1333), rented a house there, saw her lawyer mr. krishna kamal goswami, wrote letters to ramani kanta chakravarty, ex-manager of the harris-chandrapur estate, ..... may have happened when he was under the influence of ganja. lyons in. his 'medical jurisprudence for india' describes the effect of ganja in these terms:hemp acts on the brain, causing usually excitement, followed by narcotism. during the stage of excitement, the individual is the subject of hallucinations, usually but not invariably, of ..... produced is slight, consisting merely; of some pleasurable stimulation of the higher centres. this in no way affects the individual's appreciation of the consequences of his acts. in large doses hemp, like datura, causes a temporary insanity associated with hallucinations under the influence of which a person may be violent even to the .....

Sesa International Limited Vs. Avani Projects and Infrastructure Limit ...

Court : Kolkata

..... hamlets london borough council reported at (1976) 1 wlr852: (1976) 3 all er462and the decision of the hon ble supreme court in new horizons limited & anr. versus union of india & ors.reported at (1995) 1 scc478in support of the aforesaid submission. it is submitted that the court having due regard to the fact can see through ..... which is qualitatively different to that of his co-partners. it is submitted that once under the jda, the said loan was treated as a stock in trade none of the parties can resile from it and the said property is required to be attached more so when the fraudulent intent of the judgment-debtors are ..... sufficient particulars.(anand prasad agarwalla v. tarkerhwar prasad, (2001) 5 scc568. however, injunction. there is a distinction between the attachment and according to dictionary meaning, attachment means act of attaching , state of being attached . in law, it is seizure of property or person by legal authority, especially seizure of defendant s property to prevent its .....

Sailendra Nath Bhattachrjee Vs. Bijan Lal Chakravarty and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1945Cal283

..... different sublessees under the pottas (ex. e series). the solenama in the partition suit of 1926 was thus a device to legalise the acts which he had already done without any legal authority whatsoever. it was certainly a fraud on the, sub-tenants to whom lands had been given in ..... khan bhadury began to possess the very lands that were allotted to his share and started creating sub-leases in respect of the same. the finding is that in 1926 when the second partition suit was brought, sarat khan bhadury had already parted with the entire land allotted to his share under the ineffectual partition decree, in favour of ..... without making any claim of higher rent or selami. the fact that no mention was made of this permanent right in doluis' tenancy in the partition suits of 1906 and 1926 does not, in our opinion, affect the situation in the least. we will deal with this aspect of the case later on.10. mr. chandra sekhar sen, appearing .....

Bhusan Chandra Mondal Vs. Chhabimoni Dasi and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... two cases which had taken that view: bhuthnath jana v. tara chand jana 8 a.i.r. 1921 cal. 551 and manujendra dutt v. jnan ranjan 13 a.i.r. 1926 cal. 308. the matter was again considered by this court after the decision of the judicial committee in lachmi narain v. balmukund 11 a.i.r. 1924 p.c. 198 ..... to applications. in a mortgage suit it has been held that the application for a final decree has to be made within 3 years by reason of article 181, limitation act. but those decisions are not helpful because order 34, rule 4, civil p.c., expressly requires the mortgagee to make an application for a final decree, either for foreclosure or ..... brought on the record. they raised two other objections also, viz., (a) that the application for making the decree final was. hopelessly out of time inasmuch as article 181, limitation act, was applicable and (b) that inasmuch as defendant 1 was dead, they, his legal representatives, were not bound to render accounts in the same manner as defendant 1 and in .....

Chatra Serampore Co-operative Credit Society, Ltd. and ors. Vs. Bechar ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1938Cal829

..... to dismiss him. even if this view is wrong, there is a resolution of the members of the society assembled at the general meeting held on 30th may 1926 [ex. 2 (z); ii-35] by which the managing committee was authorized to dismiss the staff, and this authority according to the construction we put on ..... for the plaintiff, it means that the managing committee genuinely and honestly believed, and had reasonable grounds for believing, that a prosecution was justifiable, still they resolved to act very cautiously; and merely because this caution was frustrated by the action of the manager, it cannot be said probable and reasonable cause was wanting. in herniman v ..... from service. there are nine defendants to the suit. defendant 1 is the chatra serampore co-operative credit society, a society established under the co-operative societies act and carrying on banking business. the plaintiff becharam was the manager of the society. he was dismissed on the 29th may 1929. defendant 2 bhupendra is a .....

Madan Das and ors. Vs. Lt. Governor and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... parties have advanced separate submissions before us and have all supported the views taken by the five-judge-bench in the case of k. n. mishra vs. union of india (supra). the points taken by those learned counsel may be summed up thus: 1) as the circuit bench at port blair is situated in a ..... cases arising in the andaman & nicobar islands framed by the court in exercise of the power conferred on it under section 4 of the calcutta high court (extension of jurisdiction) act, 1953 (act no.41 of 1953) 1. in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires: (a) case includes suit, appeal, application, petition and reference; (b) circuit ..... order to exercise in respect of cases arising therein the jurisdiction and powers vested in this court by the constitution and the calcutta high court (extension of jurisdiction) act, 1953: provided that such visit shall be made at least once a month unless the chief justice otherwise directs. 3. all cases including applications under articles 226 .....