Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade unions act 1926 chapter i preliminary Court: gujarat Page 2 of about 104 results (0.037 seconds)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Vijay Ship Breaking Corporation

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [2003]261ITR113(Guj)

..... bom) was a case where the assessee porbandar state bank as ordinary resident in british india was assessed to income-tax under the provisions of the government trading taxation act, 1926. it had received deposits in porbandar state and claimed that interest paid to the depositors on such deposits was an allowable deduction under section 10(2)( ..... unwanted stems of the tobacco leaves, selling them to bidi manufacturers, involved 'processing' of goods. (z-9) the decision of the supreme court in ujagar prints v. union of india : [1989]179itr317(sc) was cited for the proposition that the processes of bleaching, dyeing, printing, sizing, shrink-proofing, water-proofing, rubberising and organdie ..... , and, therefore, the order of remand made by the tribunal was unnecessary. (r) the decision of the supreme court in hyderabad industries ltd. v. union of india [1995] elt 641 was cited for the proposition that the asbestos fibre that is removed from the parent rock is in every respect the asbestos .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Vijay Ship Breaking Corpn. and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 181(2003)CLT134

..... ) was a case where the assessee porbandar state bank as ordinary resident in british india was assessed to income-tax under the provisions of the government trading taxation act, 1926. it had received deposits in porbandar state and claimed that interest paid to the depositors on such deposits was an allowable deduction under section 10(2)( ..... unwarranted stems of the tobacco leaves, selling them to the bidi manufacturers, involved 'processing' of goods.(z-9) decision of the supreme court in ujagar prints v. union of india : [1989]179itr317(sc) was cited for the proposition that the processes of bleaching, dyeing, printing, sizing, shrink-proofing, waterproofing, rubberising and organdie processing ..... , therefore, the order of remand made by the tribunal was unnecessary.(r) the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in hyderabad industries ltd. v. union of india 1995 elt 641 (sc) was cited for the proposition that the asbestos fibre that is removed from the parent rock is in every respect the .....

Cit Vs. Vijay Ship Breaking Corporation and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2003)181CTR(Guj)134

..... ) was a case where the assessee porbandar state bank as ordinary resident in british india was assessed to income-tax under the provisions of the government trading taxation act, 1926. it had received deposits in porbandar state and claimed that interest paid to the depositors on such deposits was an allowable deduction under section 10(2)( ..... unwarranted stems of the tobacco leaves, selling them to the bidi manufacturers, involved 'processing' of goods.(z-9) decision of the supreme court in ujagar prints v. union of india : [1989]179itr317(sc) was cited for the proposition that the processes of bleaching, dyeing, printing, sizing, shrink-proofing, waterproofing, rubberising and organdle processing ..... , therefore, the order of remand made by the tribunal was unnecessary.(r) the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in hyderabad industries ltd. v. union of india 1995 elt 641 (sc) was cited for the proposition that the asbestos fibre that is removed from the parent rock is in every respect the .....

Suhrid Geigy Ltd. Vs. Chemical Mazdoor Sabha

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1980)21GLR466

..... is engaged in the business of manufacturing pharmaceutical and chemicals. it has got its factory at renofi in baroda district.3. the respondent is a trade union registered under the indian trade unions act and commands membership of the majority of the workers employed in the factory of the petitioner at the relevant time.4. according to the petitioner ..... be departed from. even then, it does not improve the position of the petitioner company. the respondent union was justified in seeking sustenance from the provisions of the proviso to section 25j(i) of the i.d. act and the said provision entitled them to rely on the concerned standing orders. if the tribunal entertained this ..... decided to go in a for a joint reference under section 10(2) of the industrial disputes act, 1947.on this statements are put the signatures of both the personnel manager of the petitioner company and president of the respondent union respectively.16. mr. bhait taking a clue from the recitals mentioned in para (e) the .....

Aop of Sanjaybhai R. Patel and 11 ors. Vs. Assessing Officer - Asstt. ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [2004]267ITR129(Guj)

..... the powers under section 154 of the act are totally excluded so far as the settlement commission is concerned. the principles governing the interpretation of statute are well-established. in this regard, he has invited our attention to the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in the case of bhatia international v/s. bulk trading s.a. and another, : ..... considered by court. in this connection, he has relied on the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in the case of m/s. british airways ple. v/s. union of india and others, : 2002(139)elt6(sc) wherein it is held that 'while interpreting a statute, the court should try to sustain its validity and give such ..... to be heard and after such further evidence as may be placed before it or obtained by it, may pass an order in accordance with the provisions of the act.28. section 245e empowers the settlement commission to reopen completed proceedings subject to the conditions laid down therein. it confers an extended jurisdiction so as to cover certain .....

Nasik Hing Supplying Company Vs. Annapurna Gruh Udyog Bhandar

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR2003Guj275; (2003)2GLR926; (2003)2PLR926; [2003]46SCL118(Guj)

..... 100a c.p.c. commences with the non-obstante clause 'notwithstanding anything contained .... .... .... in any other law for the time-being inforce', the said words cover the trade marks act, 1958 also, and therefore, where an appeal from order is heard by a single judge of a high court, no further appeal lies from such judgment and decree. the ..... the provisions of c.p.c. and clauses of a letters patent of a high court on the other hand, the former prevail over the latter was clearly enunciated in union of india v. mohindra supply co. : [1962]3scr497 . clause 10 of the letters patent expressly granted a right to appeal from one judge of the high court ..... of the courts subordinate to the high court, but section 100-a does not purport to take away the substantive right of appeal conferred by a special statute like the trade marks act.23. that brings us to the decision of another division bench of this court in jaimin j. desai v. gujarat chamber of commerce & industry : air2000guj139 , which .....

Ghanshyambhai Muljibhai Patel Vs. Bank of Inida

Court : Gujarat

..... . further, it is also on record that the pension regulations of all the nationalised banks are uniform, they are in effect framed, after due procedure of consultation with different staff unions/ association etc., by the indian banks association, in consultation with the reserve bank of india and approved by the central government. thereafter the board of directors of respective banks adopts ..... india (employees) pension regulations, 1995 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (f) of sub section (2) of section 19 of the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of understandings) act, 1970 ( 5 of 1970), the board of directors of bank of india, after consultation with the reserve bank of india and with the previous sanction of the central government hereby .....

NitIn P. Shah Alias Modi Vs. Dy. C.i.T.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2005)194CTR(Guj)306; [2005]276ITR411(Guj)

..... v. dorjee tshering bhutia : (1993)iiillj47sc n.b.sanjana, assistant collector of central excise v. elphinstone spinning and weaving mills co.ltd. : 1973ecr6(sc) b. balakotaiah v. union of india : [1958]1scr1052 and afzal ullah v. state of u.p. : [1964]4scr991 ).'even on this ground the assessing officer was not justified in holding that the sum ..... appreciating the alternate claim of the appellant that if the amount of rs. 67.75 lacs is not recovered from l.t. shroff group, the same may be allowed as trading loss ?'3. heard mr. s.n. soparkar, learned senior advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant and mr. m.r. bhatt, learned senior standing counsel appearing on ..... they are violative of the provisions of the constitution as well as go beyond the powers available to the board under the act. a similar contention was specifically raised in a case before the supreme court in case of union of india and anr v. azadi bachao andolan and another (2003) 263 itr 706. the supreme court observed :'it .....

Ahmedabad Millowners' Association and Anr. Vs. Thakore (i.G.) (Preside ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1965Guj112; (1964)GLR705; (1965)ILLJ567Guj

..... ii of list iii of the concurrent legislative list in the 1935 act, viz., 'trade unions, industrial and labour disputes,' 10. but as the two acts deal with the same subject-matter, the bombay act must give way to the central act and became void as from 1 april 1947 when the latter act was brought into force under sub-section (1) of s. 107 ..... of conduct is identical which each prescribes and s. 109 applies. that this is so is settled at least when the sanctions they impose are diverse. [humme v. palmer [(1926) 38 c.l.r. 441.] but the reason is that by prescribing the rule to be observed, the federal statute shows an intention to cover the subject-matter and ..... those in 1951 and 1956. the argument was that both the acts were enacted under item 29 of part ii in list 3 of the constitution act of 1935, that both of them dealt with trade unions and industrial and labour disputes as is clear from the preambles of the two acts which state that they were enacted for the regulation of relations between .....

NitIn Shantilal Bhagat and 1 Vs State of Gujarat Through B R Choksi

Court : Gujarat

..... that the power to issue prerogative writs possessed by the chartered high courts was an exercise of original jurisdiction (see mahomedalli allabux v. ismailji abdulali, (air 1926 bom 332), raghunath keshav khadilkar v. poona municipality, (air 1945 born 7), ryots of garabandho and other villages v. zamindar of parlakimedi, (air 1943 pc ..... , ahmedabad, by judgment dated 12th may 2008 passed in criminal case no. 368 of 1996 pertaining to offence punishable under the provisions of drugs and cosmetics act, 1940. in the other case, the appellants have been punished by the learned chief metropolitan magistrate, ahmedabad, in criminal case no. 126 of 1997. ..... chief metropolitan magistrate, ahmedabad, in criminal case no. 368 of 1996. the said case pertains to offences punishable under the provisions of drugs and cosmetics act, 1940, allegedly committed by the appellants herein. learned single judge after hearing the parties quashed the order dated 12th may 2008 passed by chief metropolitan .....