Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade unions act 1926 chapter i preliminary Court: delhi Page 28 of about 412 results (0.140 seconds)

Aig (Mauritius) Llc Vs. Tata Televentures (Holdings) Ltd. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003IIAD(Delhi)672; 103(2003)DLT250

..... of sundry information calculated to assist the shareholders in arriving at an informed and commercially pragmatic decision. 14. it is possible that section 395 of the act is invoked in a scheme of merger or reorganisation of a company between several transferor companies with the transferee company. this scheme may envisage the purchase ..... the compulsory acquisition provisions offended the constitution and that the 'fair value' should include a compensatory 'premium for forcible takeover.' 13. section 395 of the act is an extremely lengthy provision; it would be of advantage to fragment it into some of its constituent parts in order to ascertain its applicability. the ..... to each other. thereafter section 394(4)(b) states that 'transferee company' does not include any company other than a company within the meaning of the companies act; but 'transferor company' includes any body corporate. this definition also applies to section 395, as specifically mentioned in its sub-section (5) (b). this .....

The Sant Nirankari Mandal and ors. Vs. Delhi School Tribunal and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1987Delhi311; 1989LabIC740

..... in an area then such a section of the people would be regarded as a linguistic minority. in the present case the delhi school education act is applicable only to the union territory of delhi. it is with reference to this territory that one has to consider as to whether sindhi is a language spoken by the ..... said provisions are applicable to aided minority schools. as aided minority schools were covered, the provisions of the act were challenged by some minority institutions in this court. in s. s. jain sabha (of rawalpindi) delhi and others v. union of india and others 2nd (1976) ii delhi 61. a division bench of this court came to the ..... aided minority school to whom the provisions of chapter iv of the act clearly applied. (11) the provisions of the delhi school education act, and of section 12 in particular, came up for consideration before the supreme court in the cases of frank anthony public school employees' association v. union of india and others, : [1987]1scr238 . frank anthony public .....

Joginder Nath Vs. Surinder Nath and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1970Delhi171

..... established, at rawalpindi' a reputation of first class house of stock and share brokers and dealers and the contractual business was started with the help of trade name and old established reputation and clientele. whenever funds were needed, the parties approached their mother smt. bhagwanti and the needed financial help was always forthcoming ..... the next contention of the learned counsel for surinder nath was that the agreement exhibit p. i was a sham transaction and was never intended to be acted upon and that it was executed for avoiding oppressive taxation. in this connection, the learned counsel referred to certain circumstances. the first circumstance, relied upon. ..... partnership between surinder nath and the brothers and that the said document is sham, ineffective and incapable of constituting partnership and that it has never been acted upon, there having been no performance by or on behalf of the brothers and that the brothers are estopped from contending to the contrary and that .....

Cogent Silver Fibre Pte Ltd. Vs. Noble Fibre Technologies Inc. and ors ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR2006Delhi292; 127(2006)DLT707; 2006(87)DRJ583

..... said product on behalf of the defendant no. 1. the defendant no. 1 also charges a license fee, which an established business practice in relation to any trade. it is keeping the same in mind that during the stage of negotiations and even in the memorandum of understanding, which was to form the basis for further ..... the defendant no. 1 argued that in view of legal position contained in section 14(1)(c), section 19 read with section 41(e) of the specific relief act such a clause cannot be specifically enforced. the learned senior counsel in support of this submission, highlighted following aspects:(a) the alleged mou is determinable in nature.(b ..... and is incapable of being specifically performed. thereforee, no decree for specific performance can be passed.(h) even otherwise in view of the provisions of the specific relief act, decree for perpetual injunction would not be passed as the plaintiff can be compensated in money terms.6. the defendant no. 2 has filed his separate written statement. .....

R.S. Rathore Vs. Reserve Bank of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : IV(2008)BC599

..... . the complaint states that the company submitted an application on 3rd july, 1997 to the complainant rbi under section 45ia of the reserve bank of india act, 1934 ('act') for grant of a certificate of registration for carrying on business as a non-banking financial company (nbfc). it is then stated that for the purposes ..... furnished by or under or for the purposes of any provisions of this act, or any order, regulation or direction made or given thereunder or in any prospectus or advertisement issued for or in connection with the invitation by any person, of ..... be noticed that the present complaint has been filed specifically in relation to the offences by the company and its directors under sections 58b and 58c of the rbi act. the said two sections read as under:58b. penalties- (1) whoever in any application, declaration, return, statement, information or particulars made, required or .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Pushpa Devi

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1971Delhi292; [1971]82ITR7(Delhi)

..... his self-acquired property with the character of a coparcenary property, what constitutes impressing self-acquired property with the character of a coparcenary property is the unequivocal act on the part of the coparcener to abandon his individual exclusive right in the property in favor of the coparcenary. it is a well-known principle of ..... , the interest of the un-specified [deceased in the mitakshara coparcenary property the same right of testamentary or intestate succession as the case may be, under the act and not by survivorship. to that limited extent perhaps, the male relative who claims through the female relative specified in class 1. will have the right to ..... of generosity to support persons whom the holder was not bound to support, or from the failure to maintain separate accounts. abandonment cannot be inferred, for an act of generosity or kindness will not ordinarily be regarded as an admission of a legal obligation.on behalf of the assessed. strong reliance has been placed on .....

Kuldeep Kumar Vs. Chander Kanta

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1984CriLJ550; 1984(2)Crimes173; 1984(6)DRJ67; 1984RLR136

..... married on 20-2-1980. their marriage was dissolved by the additional district judge on 6-1-1982. the wife was granted under section 25 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 (the act) a monthly maintenance of rs. 200.00 per month with effect from 21-9-1981. inspire of this order, the learned metropolitan magistrate, in a petition under ..... alimony or maintenance is not equivalent to maintaining the wife and cannot oust or take away the jurisdiction of the magistrate l.c. kent v. e.e.l. kent air 1926 mad. 59. such an order will, of course, be relevant only in considering what form of order the magistrate should make. sec 125 contains no direction that an ..... was eminently justified in this case because the husband was persistently refusing to pay the maintenance in spite of the order of the civil court under section 25 of the act ; and even the attachment of his salary was not sufficient to comply with that order. i am, thereforee, not prepared to interfere with the order. the learned additional .....

Jindal Exports Ltd. Vs. Fuerst Day Lawson

Court : Delhi

..... is required to be answered in the context of section 50 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 and, in our opinion, the answer is in the negative. for this conclusion, we rely upon a four-judge decision of the supreme court in union of india v. mohindra supply co. : air 1962 sc 256 and a constitution bench ..... 5. jurisdiction of high court of delhi. - (1) the high court of delhi shall have, in respect of the territories for the time being included in the union territory of delhi, all such original, appellate and other jurisdiction as, under the law in force immediately before the appointed day, is exercisable in respect of the said ..... . there is also nothing in the expression 'authorised by law to hear appeals from original decrees of the court' contained in section 39(1) of the arbitration act which by implication reserves the jurisdiction under the letters patent to entertain an appeal against the order passed in arbitration proceedings. therefore, in so far as letters patent .....

Abdul Mueed and ors. Vs. Hammad Ahmed and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... .76. we, therefore, answer both the questions referred by the hon'ble single judge in negative and hold that for the purpose of section 20 of act 1971, the act 1963 and its provisions (except-section 17) have no application whatsoever. the law laid down by the apex court in pallav sheth (supra) does not ..... the alleged contempt was committed when the affidavit was filed by the respondent in fao 262-264 of 2005. according to section 20 of the contempt of courts act, 1970, the contempt could be initiated against the respondent till november, 2006. admittedly the present petition is not filed by the petitioners by november, 2006. the ..... such evidence as deems fit and merely because disputed questions of fact are involved, it would not preclude the court from exercising its jurisdiction under the contempt of courts act, 1971. the learned senior counsel further contended that making false statements on oath may deliberately constitute criminal contempt and relied on murray and company vs. ashok kr. .....

Ferruccio Sias and anr. Vs. Jai Manga Ram Mukhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1993IVAD(Delhi)713; 1994(28)DRJ143

..... regarding their future, and in view of the fact that the supreme court of india had, in : (1983)illj45sc (national textile workers ' union v. p.r. ramakrishnan and others) stated that the workmen of the company have to be heard in the matter of amalgamation under section 391 of the ..... and other powers conferred by these articles, it is hereby expressly declared that the managing director and the joint managing director shall always subject to the provisions of act, have the following powers jointly and severally, that is to say; (17) to institute, prosecute, compound, defend, compromise, withdraw or abandon any legal ..... ltd., : air1991delhi25 has reviewed large number of cases bearing upon the question of signing and verification of plaints, postulated by order 29 civil procedure code ., the authority to act and authority to institutesuits,whenasuit is instituted by acorporation. in that judgment also, this court has reiterated what was stated in m/s. oberoi hotel (india) pvt .....