Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade unions act 1926 chapter i preliminary Court: delhi Page 27 of about 412 results (0.252 seconds)

C.R. Abrol Vs. Administrator Under the Slum Areas and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1970Delhi768

..... satish chander is a government officer getting a basic salary of rs. 825.00 plus allowances per month. mela ram is a shopkeeper with a certain stock in trade and also a certain income from his shop, and yet all these three petitioners have stated that they do not own any immoveable or moveable properties. such a ..... the same observa- tion, in our view, would hold good regarding the jurisdiction of the competent authority under section 19(1) of the slum areas ( improvement & clearance) act, 1956. the competent authority is also a tribunal of limited jurisdiction. nevertheless, it has also to make the preliminary inquiry and make preliminary finding as to the existence of relationship ..... any of the specified grounds on which alone the eviction would be ordered. as recognised by the supreme court, thereforee, in jyoti parsad v. administration for union territory of delhi, : [1962]2scr125 , an additional restriction on the right of the landlord to evict the tenant is imposed by section 19 of the .....

Delhi Abhibhavak Mahasangh and ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... delhi. the supreme court decided all the appeals/petitions vide judgment dated 27.04.2004 dismissing these appeals. the said judgment is reported as modern school v. union of india (uoi) and ors. (2004) 5 scc 583. 8. according to dam even when the appeals of these schools were dismissed and judgment of this court attained ..... of the constitution come into play. article 19(1)(g) gives the right to all the citizens to practice any profession or to carry on any occupation, trade or business; this right is subject to restrictions that may be placed under article 19(6). article 26 gives the right to every religious denomination to establish and ..... provisions: 37. at this stage, it would be apt to reproduce the relevant statutory provisions contained in 1973 act and the rules which have bearing on the subject matter: "sections: 2. (a) "administrator" means the administrator of the union territory of delhi appointed by the president under article 239 of the constitution; xxx xxx xxx e) "appropriate .....

Sheila Devi and ors. Vs. Kishan Lal Kalra and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1974Delhi491

..... l-2 license in .dispute, from m/s kishan lal & co. wine merchants to kishan lal, wine merchant and kishan lal wine merchants (p) ltd. and using the stock-in-trade, good-will, business premises and other assets, etc. of the said m/s kishan lal & co., wine merchants, or those of m/s esplanade bar & restaurant or of m/s ..... accounts.' (5) hans raj kalra also filed another suit no. 429 of 1971 on the original side of this high court in october, 1971, against (1) the union of india, (2) the lt. governor, union territory of delhi, (3) the commissioner of excise, (4) the collector of excise, (5) kishan lal kalra, (6) to (ii), the widow and five children of ..... accordance with the provisions of the rules framed by the high court of judicature at lahore which are still applicable to the union territory of delhi by virtue of the provisions in section. 7 of the delhi high court act, 1966.(8) it was stated in the order of reference that there was some controversy before the learned judge on the question .....

J.W. Benon Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 5(1969)DLT483

..... punjab, a single writ petition was filed challenging the validity of the taxes imposed by various district boards on professions, trades, callings, etc. the said petition was filed by the revenue patwaris union, punjab, on behalf of all the patwaris of the state, and the authority and jurisdiction of the district boards in ..... society. land acquistion proceedings were started in respect of the said bungalows. the land acquisition officer issued ntoices under section 9 of the land acquisition act to the petitioners. the petitioners appeared before him and made their representations. the land acquisition officer had nto given his final award and yet steps ..... same as the previous public purpose mentioned in the cancelled ntoifications. on february, 24th 1961, a fresh ntoification under section 6 of the land acquisition act was made. thereupon, the various petitioners filed the writ petitions in question challenging the validity of the proceedings initiated by the second set of ntoifications .....

JaIn Commission of Enquiry

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 51(1993)DLT624

..... the sit is duty-bound to produce the case diary and other investigation record. reliance was placed by him on a division bench decision of the delhi high court in union of india v. delhi bar and others. 1989 (3) delhi lawyer 306. the division bench followed the decision of the supreme court in khatri v. state of bihar, : [1981]3scr145 ..... subject him to or be used against him in any civil or criminal proceeding, except a prosecution for giving false evidence by such statement provided that the statement (a) is trade in reply to a question which he is required by the commission to answer or (b) is relevant to the subject matter of the inquiry.3.9 thus, it would ..... use of with reference to the provisions of section 161 of the cr.p.c. and section 145 of the indian evidence act. reliance was placed by shri b. dutta on a decision of thesupreme court in mukund lal v. union of india, : air1989sc144 . in my opinion, the submission of mr. dutta is devoid of any force. section 172(3) of the .....

Shambhunath Goenka Vs. Madan Mohan Ghuwalewala

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1977Delhi247

..... dispute between the parties was referred to the arbitrator he had jurisdiction to award interest for the period the litigation remained pending between the parties. the supreme court held in union of india v. bungo steel furniture private ltd. : [1967]1scr324 (7) that the principle of section 34 of the code of civil procedure can be applied by the arbitrator ..... to my notice as should place the arbitration in question beyond the pale of section 47, or, for the matter of that, the other relevant provisions of the arbitration act. shri suri gave his decision after going through the firm's books of account and other documents on record and after hearing the parties. his decision amounted, in the ..... m.s. joshi, j.(1) shambhunath goenka and madan mohan were carrying on business as partners under the name and style of sugar trading company at muzaffarnagar. the partnership was started sometime in the end of 1952 and was dissolved voluntarily on 12-10-1953. on 3-10-1956 shambhunath filed a suit .....

J.M. Ramachandra and Sons Vs. Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appell ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT217; 2002(80)ECC72; 2002(139)ELT36(Del)

..... thereforee confiscation of the goods under section 111(d) of the act read section 3(3) of the foreign trade development and regulation act, 1992 (in short 'foreign trade act') was directed. penalty of rs. 1,57,000/- was also imposed under section 112a of the act. however petitioner was permitted to redeem the goods on payment of ..... did not accept petitioner's stand and the articles were seized under a reasonable belief that those were liable for confiscation under section 111(d) of the act. petitioner requested the commissioner of customs, custom house, madras for waiver of show cause notice and prayed for a personal hearing in the matter. accordingly ..... the delay was drawn and thereforee the order is vulnerable. in response, learned counsel for uoi raised a preliminary objection, contending that the impugned order can only be assailed before the apex court under section 130e of the act and the writ petition is thereforee not maintainable. according to him, dismissal of the application .....

Mazda theatres Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. New Bank of India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1975Delhi1

..... proceeded on the view that the consent of all the shareholders was necessary if no meeting was called. substantial compliance:- in parker & cooper ltd. v. reading, (1926) ch. 975, the decisions in re george newman ltd. (11) and in re express engineering works (12) were fully considered but were distinguished on the ground ..... consent of the members to do substantial justice in the case particularly if technicality was being used to perpetrate fraud. whenever a small number of persons acting in close concert are managing the holding company as well as the subsidiary as in the present case, while recognising the separate entities of the two ..... there are individuals, with rights, expectations and obligadons inter se. which are not necessarily submerged in the company structure. that structure is defined by the companies act and by the articles of association by which shareholders agree to be bound. in most companies and in most contexts, this definition is sufficient and exhaustive, equally .....

Nabha Investment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Harmishan Dass Lukhmi Dass

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1995IAD(Delhi)1411; 58(1995)DLT285; 1995(33)DRJ496

..... not asked for as contemplated by rule 7 of order. 7 cpc, has met with a meaningful interpretation by their lordships of the supreme court in hindalco industries ltd vs . union of india and others, : (1994)2scc594 :- 'it is settled law that it is no longer necessary to specifically ask for general or other relief apart from the specific ..... is neither called upon to, nor can, exercise a jurisdiction to dismiss the suit midway the trial. (28) though the learned counsel for the defendant no. 4 has cited howrah trading co. vs. i.t. commr air 1950 s.c. 775; narsayya & sons vs s.s. light railway. air 1955 hyd 193, rama rao vs. dasarathy rao air 1955 ..... a marked contrast between the two. former protects the innocent purchaser, the latter does not do so. in the absence of any provision in section 176 of the contract act in favor of the innocent purchaser, to import such protection from the provisions of another statute is with respect wholly fallacious and unjustifiable. it is always dangerous to draw .....

Premier Hockey Development Private Ltd. Vs. Indian Hockey Federation

Court : Delhi

..... jhajharia was handling day-to-day management or was incharge of the insurance claim." (emphasis supplied) 47. reliance placed by the petitioner on shri parmeshwari prasad gupta v. union of india, air 1973 sc 2389 to submit that an invalid board resolution can be rectified in a subsequent meeting is neither here nor there because, in this case, ..... throughout the term to the company to, and to authorize third parties to, use, reproduce, publish and distribute the ihf name, the ihf logo and copyright and trade marked material owned by ihf in conformity to the format provided by ihf in accordance herewith." x x x x x x x x x x "3.4 ihf ..... board of directors of the petitioner company has not passed a legally binding resolution to initiate the present proceedings against the respondent, and to authorize mr. rajput to act on behalf of the petitioner company in these proceedings. 14. the submission of the respondent is that under the subscription and shareholders agreement dated 31.12.2004, to .....