Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

To Store - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 06 1973

Neon Motor Stores and ors. Vs. Alliance Stores Trading Co. Ltd.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Apr-06-1973

Reported in: AIR1974Guj168; (1974)0GLR272

part of the said building as shown in the plaint Ex. 36 as given on lease to Alliance Stores Trading Company Ltd., who is the present plaintiff before us. Out of the premises which were let to


Aug 11 2005

Delhi Book Store Vs. Shri K.S. Subramaniam, Sole Proprietor, the Coimb ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-11-2005

Reported in: AIR2006Delhi206

the application for leave to defend the defendant claims to be the sole proprietor of M/s. Coimbatore Books Store and being familiar with the facts and circumstances of the case, has filed the application stating that the


Dec 20 1993

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Qureshi Iron Stores

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-20-1993

Reported in: [1994]210ITR436(All)

R.K. Gulati, J.1. These are two cross-applications filed under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, one at the instance of the Revenue and the other by the assessee. Both these applications pertain to the assessment...


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 06 1950

Bengal Agency and Stores Syndicate and ors. Vs. Stores and Engineering ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-06-1950

Reported in: AIR1952Cal411

costs. The same view as in 'Atwood v. Chichester' was expressed by Jessel M. R. in 'Eaton v. Storer', (1883) 22 Ch. D. 91. He said,'The plff. was out of time, & in that case if a


Jun 29 1993

Annapoorna Fertilisers and General Stores Vs. Arunodaya Fertilisers an ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-29-1993

Reported in: AIR1994AP157; 1993(2)ALT577

was the managing partner. The second defendant was one of partners of the firm Annapurna Fertilisers and General Stores, Bantumilli, which was initially constituted with Sabbisetti Rattayya and others. That was dissolved on 1-11-1982 with the simultaneous


Aug 27 2018

Bharmal Medical Store Civil Hospital Badnagar Vs. State of m.p.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-27-2018

INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s).8590­8591 OF2018(arising out of SLP (C) No(s). 14871­14872 of 2015) BHARMAL MEDICAL STORE CIVIL HOSPITAL BADNAGAR ETC. VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS ….APPELLANT(S) ….RESPONDENT(S) with CIVIL APPEAL NO(s).8592 OF2018(arising


Mar 23 2009

Kailash Store Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-23-2009

Reported in: 2009(2)AWC1927(SC); 2009(5)SCALE148

Matched in: Parties Kailash Store Vs. Union of India (Uoi)


Mar 06 1990

Mahabir Auto Stores and Others Vs. Indian Oil Corporation and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-06-1990

Reported in: AIR1990SC1031; [1990]69CompCas746(SC); 1990(1)SCALE410; (1990)3SCC752; [1990]1SCR818; 1990(2)LC62(SC)

ORDERSabyasachi Mukharji, CJ.1. Having heard counsel for the parties and having considered the facts, circumstances and the contentions involved herein, we grant special leave and dispose of the appeal by judgment herein. This appeal arises out...


Dec 06 1990

Lakshmi Bangle Stores Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-06-1990

Reported in: II(1991)ACC1; 1991ACJ262; JT1990(4)SC614; 1990(2)SCALE1187; (1991)1SCC448; [1990]Supp3SCR457

Kuldip Singh, J.1. Messrs Lakshmi Bangle Stores instituted a suit for damages against the Eastern Railway and the South-Eastern Railway through Union of India. The


Nov 10 1998

Rasik Auto Stores and ors. Vs. NavIn V. Hantodkar and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-10-1998

Reported in: 1998VIIIAD(SC)319; AIR1999SC113; JT1998(7)SC569; 1998(6)SCALE101; (1998)8SCC177; [1998]Supp2SCR629

ORDER1. We have heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners. His only contention was that in the light of Clause 13(3)(vi) of the C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949, because the landlord is having other...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial