Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the pondicherry dramatic performances act 1965 Page 1 of about 567 results (0.205 seconds)

T. Parameswaran Vs. the District Collector, Ernakulam and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1988Ker175

..... sudhakaran pointed out the difference between section 2(1) of the travancore-dramatic performance act (act 11 of 1115) which was the corresponding siatute applicable to the travancore area of kerala state and section 2(1) of the kerala dramatic performances act, 1961 and contended that the words 'deliberately intended' are a conscious addition made by the legislature to the existing provision. ..... there appears to be no need to prove any tendency to endanger the peace, still less 'to strike the fabric of society'.under section 3 of the kerala dramatic performances act, 1961 whenever the government are satisfied that any play, pantomime or other drama performed or about to be performed in a public place is an objectionable performance, they may, by order stating the grounds on which they consider the performance objectionable, prohibit the performance. ..... applying the guidelines indicated above, we are of the view that the drama is deliberately intended to outrage the religious feelings of the christians by insulting or blaspheming or profaning christian religion and religious beliefs and is, therefore, an 'objectionable performance' as defined in the kerala dramatic performances act. ..... state of maharashtra (1965) 1 scr 65 : air 1965 sc 881 which were adopted by the khosla committee which recommended them for the guidance of film censors.4. .....

The Puducherry Slum Clearance Board Vs.

Court : Chennai

..... further, this court had an occasion to consider the scope of section 32 (iv) of the payment of bonus act, 1965 in relation to the puducherry housing board which is a sister concern of the petitioner board. 14. ..... it was also stated that the petitioner board has been created by slum areas (improvement and clearance) act, 1956 and incorporated by virtue of the slum areas (improvement and clearance)(pondicherry amendment) act, 1986. ..... mazdoor union2 the court had observed that an inference that the corporation was the agent of the government might be drawn where it was performing in substance governmental and not commercial functions. ..... therefore, in the light of the supreme court judgment, the plea made by the puducherry housing board was rejected by this court vide judgment in pondicherry housing board employees' union v. ..... the union territory of pondicherry is neither a state government nor a central government under section 2(1) and therefore, they should move the central government for exemption. ..... therefore, any exemption, henceforth can be granted only by the central government and not by the third respondent, which is only union territory of pondicherry. ..... government of pondicherry reported in 2009 (3) l.l.n.473. .....

Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. Workmen and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1995(1)KarLJ113

..... in arriving at the said conclusion the tribunal found that the pumping stations and the treatment plants, having been registered as factories under the factories act, employees working at the said stations and plants were entitled to bonus and the remaining employees of the board were not so entitled, not only because the board was a non-profit making organisation but also because it was a local authority within the meaning of section 32(iv) of the payment of bonus act, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the act). 3. ..... the court observed thus :- 'dramatic performance for monetary gains and otherwise are different and stand on different footing. ..... in terms of section 15 of the act, the board is charged with the duty of providing a supply and improving the existing supply of water in the bangalore metropolitan area and of making adequate provision for the sewerage and the disposal of the sewerage in the said area and for the efficient discharge of the said duty the board has been empowered to exercise all such powers and perform all such functions as are conferred or imposed by or under the act. ..... the supreme court held that dramatic performances for monetary gains and otherwise are different and stand on different footing. .....

Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. Workmen

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1994KAR2794

..... in arriving at the said conclusion the tribunal found that the pumping stations and the treatment, plants, having been registered as factories under the factories act, employees working at the said stations and plants were entitled to bonus and the remaining employees of the board were not so entitled, not only because the board was a non profit making organisation but also because it was a local authority within the meaning of section 32(iv) of the payment of bonus act, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the act).3. ..... the court observed thus:-'dramatic performance for monetary gains and otherwise are different and stand on different footing. ..... in terms of section 15 of the act, the board is charged with the duty of providing a supply and improving the existing supply of water in the bangalore metropolitan area and of making adequate provision for the sewerage and the disposal of the sewage in the said area and for the efficient discharge of the said duty the board has been empowered to exercise all such powers and perform all such functions as are conferred or imposed by or under the act. ..... the supreme court held that dramatic performances for monetary gains and otherwise are different and stand on different footing. .....

Mahaveer Prasad Prasan Kumar JaIn Vs. the Tahsildar, Pondicherry and a ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1978Mad171

..... still-born legislation by reason of the pondicherry legislature having abdicated its legislative assembly function in favour of the madras state legislature, such abdication resulted from the wholesale adoption of the madras act as in force in the state of madras immediately before the commencement of the principal act and that section 2 (1) read with section 1 (2) meant that the legislature adopted not only the madras act as it was when it enacted the principal act, but also such amendment or amendments in that act which might be passed by the madras legislature upto the time of the commencement of the act, i.e. ..... with the coming into force of the principal act, viz, the pondicherry general sales tax act x of 1965 which was published on 3-6-1965, after the president's assent on 25-5-1965, he was served with a notice to register himself as a dealer and thereupon he filed a petition challenging the validity of the principal act. ..... it is manifest that the assembly refused to perform its legislative function entrusted under the act constituting it. .....

B. Shama Rao Vs. the Union Territory of Pondicherry

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1480; [1967]2SCR650; [1967]20STC215(SC)

..... in fact, it was urged that the pondicherry legislature had, by enacting the principal act in the form mentioned above, abdicated its legislative functions and had given the power to the madras legislature to enact for pondicherry, because, after the principal act had been enacted on 25th may, 1965, and before it was enforced on 1st april, 1966, it was open to the madras legislature to make any amendments it liked in the madras act, and by virtue of s.2 (1) of the principal act, the madras act that was to come into force in pondicherry would be as amended by the madras legislature and ..... of non-delegation of legislative powers founded either on the doctrine of separation of powers or the theory of agency has no application to the british parliament or the legislature constituted by an act of british parliament, that the operation of the act performed under delegated power is directly and immediately under and by virtue of the law by which the power is delegated and its efficacy is referable to that antecedent law, that if the legislature acts within its prescribed sphere there is no limit to its power of delegation, it being for 'the legislature to determine how far it should seek ..... it is manifest that the assembly refused to perform its legislative function entrusted under the act constituting it. .....

D. Gobalousamy Vs. Union Territory of Pondicherry and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1968Mad298

..... finally, there is the question of the language of the courts in pondicherry, and the refinement which has now been introduced by the official language act enacted by the pondicherry legislature, act iii of 1965, when the writs were pending; we certainly agree that that is a development that we are bound to take note of, in considering the exercise of our powers ..... shall proceed on the assumption that the writ petitioner has a right to complain, and to seek these reliefs at our hands, if he can show that the orders of appointment infringed a guarantee, which is part of the treaty of cession, and which is so implemented by the poidicherry (administration) act xlix of 1962, that the guarantee is justiciable in the municipal courts of india; again, that he has a right to relief if he can show that the order of the president introducing changes in qualifications for judicial officers of the pondicherry, under the provision to art ..... 4(2) of the pondicherry (administration) act 1962 dated 12-10-1963 and the second termed the pondicherry judicial officers (qualifications) rules 1963, promulgated by the president of india on 5-10-1963, and that the appointments were based upon the modifications ensuing from ..... the legislative assembly has decided otherwise, and the consequence is the official language act of the pondicherry legislature, that i have referred to earlier, under which the tamil and english have been elevated to the status of official languages, to come into effect upon a date to .....

The Commissioner of Police, City of Bangalore Vs. R. Shankare Gowda

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1999KAR459; 1999(1)KarLJ163

..... srinivasamurthy and others v state of mysore and another, had held that the 'entertainment' and 'amusement' were wide enough to include theatres, dramatic performances, cinemas, sports and the like.black's law dictionary, 6th edition, defines 'amusement' at page 84 thus:'pastime; diversion, enjoyment. ..... the licensing authority found that as under the karnataka excise act, 1965 (hereinafter called as the 'act') and rule 11 of the karnataka excise licences (general conditions) rules, 1967 (hereinafter called as the licensing rules) the respondents could not carry on any other activity in the licensed premises, where liquor is served, they were not entitled to the grant of licences. ..... amusement is distinct and different than a premises for which licence under the licensing rules has been granted, the authority under the licensing order is obliged to considerthe prayer independently without having reference to rules 9 and 11 of the licensing rules, but, if the licensee applies for both the licences, the authority under the licensing order is justified to decline the licence, as admittedly such a licensee is forbidden under law to provide any entertainment within the licensed premises under the act and the rules made thereunder.16. ..... the licensee shall be bound by the provisions of the karnataka excise act, 1965 and any general or special rules prescribed or which may from time to time be prescribed thereunder. 2. .....

Ravi Yashwant Bhoir Vs. the Collector, District Raigad and

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2012)4SCC407

..... " misconduct in office has been defined as: "any unlawful behavior by a public officer in relation to the duties of his office, wilful in character.term embraces acts which the office holder had no right to perform, acts performed improperly, and failure to act in the face of an affirmative duty to act." p. ..... it is also pertinent to refer to the provisions of section 81 of the act 1965 which reads as under: "section 81- provisions in regard to meetings of council: the following provisions shall be observed with respect to the meetings of a council: (1) for the disposal of general business, which shall be restricted to matters relating to the powers, duties and functions of the council as specified in this act or any other law for the time being in force, and any welcome address to a distinguished visitor, proposal for giving manpatra to a distinguished person or resolution of condolence (where all or any ..... 4665 of 2009 by which the high court has affirmed and upheld the judgment of the hon'ble chief minister of maharashtra declaring that the conduct of the appellant was unbecoming of the president of uran municipal council and declared him to be disqualified for remaining tenure of municipal councilorship under section 55b of the maharashtra municipal councils, nagar panchayats and industrial townships act, 1965 (hereinafter called as the `act 1965) and further declared him disqualified for a period of six years from the date of the order i.e. ..... of pondicherry & anr. v. v. .....

Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Mr. Gajendra Singh and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR532; 2007(6)BomCR700; (2007)109BOMLR2072; 2008BusLR161(Bom); LC2007(3)299; 2008(36)PTC53(Bom)

..... it was admitted that the film was different from the sketch and that it was impossible to suggest that it infringed in any respect the copyright of the sketch.the plaintiff alleged that the defendants issued advertisements with regard to their film which were likely to deceive members of the public into belief that the laudatory notices in the press in respect of the performances, based on the plaintiff's sketch might apply to the defendant's film and that the defendant's advertisements showed an intention on the part of the defendants to appropriate the benefits of the notice to their ..... .section 2(m)(ii) defines infringing copy as follows:'2(m) 'infringing copy' means-(ii) in relation to a cinematographic film, a copy of the film made on any medium by any means.section 14 of the copyright act, 1957 for the purpose of the act defines 'copyright' to mean the exclusive right subject to the provisions of the act, to do or authorize the doing of any of the following acts in respect of a work or any substantial part thereof, namely:(d) in the case of a cinematograph film:(i) to make a copy of the film, including a photograph of any image forming part thereof;(ii) to sell or give on hire, or offer for ..... 821 where the court of appeal held that the dramatic copyright act, 1833 creates a monopoly, and in such a case there must be certainty in the subject-matter of such monopoly in order to avoid injustice to the rest of the world.145. ..... swinton and pendlebury borough council [1965] 1 w.l.r. .....