Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the pondicherry dramatic performances act 1965 Page 2 of about 567 results (0.424 seconds)

Mar 10 1977 (HC)

Municipal Council Morshi Vs. Tulsiram

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1978Bom92; 1977MhLJ735

..... my judgment, there is considerable force in this contention urged onbehalf of the petitioner and it must be upheld, and in view of the circumstances pointed out above it must be held that the law would excuse non-performance of an act which became impossible of performance on account of reasons beyond the control of the landlord. ..... found that this was a case of imposition of a new consolidated property tax for the first time under the provisions of the maharashtra municipalities act, 1965 and there is also an increase in the assessment and, therefore, the individual notices were necessary. ..... substance, therefore, in the said case this court held that an appeal pro-vided by section 86 of the bombay district municipal act which is similar to section 169of the maharashtra municipalities act, 1965 is merely confined to the valuation and assessment shown in the entry in the assessment list and to the tax, final is, the quantum of the sum claimed in the bill and no other ..... not disputed that a public notice as contemplated by section 119 (1) of the maharashtra municipalities act, 1965, referred to hereinafter as the act, was issued by the municipal council. ..... : [1965]3scr187 wherein after referring to the maxim 'lex non cogit ad impossibilia' (the law does not compel the doing of impossibilities), the supreme court held that the performance of impossible duty ..... act, 1965 ..... maharashtra revenue tribunal, nagpur 1965 mh lj 753 and particularly towards the following observations of this court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 17 1999 (HC)

Mohammed Yunus Vs. Urban Improvement Trust, Jodhpur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1999Raj334; 1999(3)WLC645; 1999(1)WLN552

..... the unscrupulous persons, whoapproach the writ court with oblique motive to achieve an ulterior object, should not be permitted to abuse the process of the court, for the writ court acts as the custodian of the constitution and performs the solemn duty 'to maintain the social balance by interfering where necessary for the sake of justice and refusing to interfere where it is against the social interest and public good' as the equity is always known to prevent the law from crafty evasions and subleties inviting to invade the law. ..... than one dwelling house on it; (c) the licencee shall erect the building and complete the same within a period of three years and obtain the completion certificate from the trust; (d) the building so erected shall be used solely for the boarding house; (e) the licencee shall not transfer or assign the licence, or the benefit thereof, or execute any instrument purporting to do so; (f) in the event of breach, non-performance or non-observance of any of the foregoing conditions, the licensor shall be entitled to revoke and determine the licence thereby granted and re-enter ..... rawat ram, air 1965 raj 180, were not taken into consideration, wherein it has categorically been held that the municipal board, in exercise of its power under section 203 of the said act, can remove the encroachment or obstruction from public land.25. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 1970 (HC)

Hungerford Investment Trust Ltd. Vs. Haridas Mundhra and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1971Cal182,75CWN517

..... on the question of the orders of attachment obtained by the decree-holders in the kanpur and allahabad decrees and the order for stay of execution obtained by the income-tax department, it was submitted that those were questions which were raised in the earlier application and have been dealt with by the division bench in dismissing the appeal, and as such it could not be urged by the appellant in this application that the attachment orders and the stay order constituted a bar to the performance of the contract under the decree.46. mr. ..... performance of a contract of the sale or lease of immovable property has been made and the purchaser or lessee does not, within the period allowed by the decree or such further period as the court may allow, pay the purchase money or other sum which the court has ordered him to pay, the vendor or lessor may apply in the same suit in which the decree is made, to have the contract rescinded and on such application the court may, by order, rescind the contract either so far as regards the party in default or altogether, as the ..... the decree for specific performance, it was argued, was passed on february 25, 1964, without fixing a time for payment of the consideration for the shares; and therefore on march 1, 1965, the appellant had no existing right which would come under the saving provision in section 3(a) of the new act. ..... the aims and objects of the seller and the buyer of the shares have shifted and changed with dramatic suddenness. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 2012 (HC)

Dr.J.Santhosh Kumar. Vs. the Block Medical Officer.

Court : Chennai

..... a combined reading of the aforesaid acts, namely, the bombay homoeopathic practitioners' act, 1959, the indian medical council act, 1956 and the maharashtra medical council act, 1965 indicates that a person who is registered under the bombay homoeopathic practitioners' act, 1959 can practise homoeopathy only and that he cannot be registered under the indian medical council act, 1956 or under the state act, namely, the maharashtra medical council act, 1965, because of the restriction on registration of persons not possessing the requisite qualification. ..... to the health or property of the public or the people in general who dwell or occupy property in the vicinity, or persons who may have occasion to use any public right.61.section 16 deals with authorization of health officer to perform the functions of executive authority in public health matters, notwithstanding anything contained in the madras city municipal act, 1919, the tamil nadu district municipalities act, 1920, the tamil nadu local boards act, 1920 (the tamil nadu village panchayats act, 1950] the tamil nadu prevention of adulteration act, 1918, and the places ..... it is the case of the petitioner that while taking her from tirukoilur to pondicherry, she expired. ..... the petitioner asked the ambulance driver to take the said bagiyammal to jawaharlal nehru institute of medical sciences and research, jipmer, pondicherry. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2009 (SC)

Mepco Industries Ltd., Madurai Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2009)227CTR(SC)313; [2009]319ITR208(SC); JT2009(14)SC339; 2010(I)OLR(SC)129; 2009(14)SCALE87; (2010)1SCC434; [2009]185TAXMAN409(SC)

..... in that case, the appellant- assessee derived profits from three industries, one of which qualified for special rebate under part-i of schedule-i to the finance act, 1965, for the assessment year 1966-1967. ..... section 154(1), inter alia, states that, with a view to rectify any mistake apparent from the record, an income tax authority may amend any order passed by it under the provisions of the act, whereas section 147, inter alia, states that if the assessing officer has reason to believe that any income charged to tax has escaped assessment for any assessment year, he may, subject to the provisions of sections 148 to 153, assess or re-assess such income which has escaped ..... aggrieved by the said order, the appellant herein filed writ petitions before the madras high court, which took the view that, in view of the subsequent decision of this court in the case of sahney steel and press works limited (supra), the department was entitled to invoke section 154 of the act and that the commissioner was right in treating the receipt of subsidies as a revenue receipt. ..... its factory is located in the union territory of pondicherry. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 2005 (HC)

Narayan Murti Vs. Thankamma Sebastian

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2005(3)KLT102

..... court dealing with a case under the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act, held thus: 'under the second proviso to section 10(1) if the controller decides that the tenant's denial of the title of the landlord or the claim to permanent tenancy is bona fide, then the landlord is entitled to sue for eviction of the tenant in a civil court which would have the jurisdiction to pass a decree for eviction on any of the grounds mentioned in sections 10, 14, 15 and 16 of the act, notwithstanding that the court finds that such denial does ..... , air 1988 patna 123, a division bench took the view that a suit for eviction filed under the bihar buildings (lease, rent and eviction) control act is not liable to be stayed under section 10 of the code of civil procedure till the disposal of the suit for specific performance of the agreement to sell filed by the tenant. ..... our survey of various decisions rendered by different high court under the relevant provisions of the rent control statutes in currency in the state of andhra pradesh, bihar, goa, orissa, pondicherry, rajasthan, tamilnadu, uttar pradesh and tripura and our own statute and the commentaries of r.c. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 1973 (SC)

Gwalior Rayon Silk Mfg. (Wvg.) Co. Ltd. Vs. the Asstt. Commissioner of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1974SC1660; [1974]94ITR204(SC); (1974)4SCC98; [1974]2SCR879; [1974]33STC219(SC)

..... .61. in that case, the legislative assembly for the union territory of pondicherry passed the pondicherry general sales tax act (10 of 1965) which was published on june 30, 1965 section 1(2) of the act provided, that it would come into force on such date as the pondicherry government may, by notification, appoint, and section 2(1) provided that the madras general sales tax act, 1959, as in force in the state of madras immediately before the commencement of the pondicherry act, shall be extended to pondicherry subject to certain modifications, one of which related to the constitution of the appellate ..... that power that it shall not be delegated without laying down principles, policy, standard or guidance to another body unless the constitution expressly permits delegation; and (v) the taxing provisions are not exception to these rules.it was further observed :the constitution entrusts the legislative functions to the legislative branch of the state and directs that the functions shall be performed by that body to which the constitution has entrusted and not by some one else to whom the legislature at a given time thinks it proper to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 16 1981 (HC)

Pokardas and Brothers and anr. Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [1982]51STC88(Guj)

..... the facts in the said case were that the legislative assembly of the union territory of pondicherry passed the pondicherry general sales tax act, 1965, which received the assent of the president on 25th may, 1965. ..... the pondicherry legislature passed the pondicherry sales tax (amendment) act, 1966, whereby it was, inter alia, provided that the madras general sales tax rules, 1959, and any other rules made or issued under the said act and similarly in force in so far as their application is required fort he purpose of effectively applying the provisions of the said act shall also extend to and be in force in the union territory of pondicherry until such time as the rules are framed under the pondicherry act. ..... (as he then was) and at page 225 the court ruled as under : 'the question then is whether in extending the madras act in the manner and to the extent it did under section 2(1) of the principle act the pondicherry legislature abdicated its legislative power in favour of the madras legislature. ..... this part of the ruling of the court clearly indicates that the pondicherry legislation was held to be void since it not only applied the madras act or the rules as were in force but also the act as may be amended in future, and to that extent there was a complete non-application of mind. ..... it is manifest that the assembly refused to perform its legislative function entrusted under the act constituting it. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 1974 (HC)

Ghousia Begum Vs. the Union Territory of Pondicherry

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1975Mad345

..... the government of the union territory of pondicherry made the declaration under section 6 of the land acquisition act on 5-7-1965 to the effect that the land was required for a public purpose, being a purpose of the union, to wit. ..... 'competent authority', according to section 2(b) of the requisitioning and acquisition of immovable property act, 1952, means any person or authority authorised by the central government by notification in the official gazette to perform the functions of the competent authority under this act for such area as may be specified in the notification. ..... governor of pondicherry could not be stated to have been authorised by the central government to perform the functions of the competent authority under the requisitioning and acquisition of immovable property act, 1952. ..... section 3(1) of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968, which received the assent of the president on 24-5-1968 and was published on that date, says that the acts specified in part i of the schedule as they are generally in force in the territories to which they extend and the acts specified in part ii of the schedules as they were in force on the 1st day of august, 1966, in the state or union territory mentioned there against shall extend to pondicherry, subject to the modifications, if any, specified in the schedule. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 25 1988 (HC)

Ramesh Birch and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1988P& H281

..... the assembly passed the pondicherry general sales tax act x of 1965, hereinafter referred to as the principal act, which was published on june 3, 1965, after receiving the assent of the president on may 25, 1965: section 1(2) of that act provided that the act would come into force on such date as the government may by notification appoint, section 2(1) provided that 'the madras general sales tax act, 1959(act no. ..... in exercise of the powers under section 1(2), the pondicherry government issued a notification dated march 1, 1966, bringing into force the madras act as extended by the act to pondicherry with effect from april 1, 1966, but in the meantime, the madras legislature had amended the madras act and consequently it was the madras act, as amended up to april l, 1966 which was brought into force under the said notification. ..... for one thing, even on the basis of the reasoning of the learned judges, since the rower to legislate about the rates of stamp duty is vested in the state legislature in list ii of the seventh schedule and the amendment, by punjab act 27 of 1981, which is impugned in this case, related to only the rates of stamp duty payable on conveyance, an the ratio of the judgment in chander bhan's case (air 1965 punj 279)(supra) itself, the extension of punjab act 27 of 1981, to the union territory of chandigarh is not unconstitutional. ..... is manifest that the assembly refused to perform its legislative function entrusted under the act constituting it. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //