Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the kerala public accountants amendment act 2007 Page 1 of about 25,591 results (0.477 seconds)

Sreedharan Nair Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1975)ILLJ310Ker

..... therefore, the only contention advanced by counsel for the petitioner before me is that above amendment, in so far as it purports to operate in respect of any period prior to 25-1-1970 on which date the kerala public services (amendment) act, 1970 came into force empowering the government to make rules with retrospective effect, is invalid. ..... rule 6 as it stood till it was amended by a notification dated 19-7-1972 provided that every person appointed to the category of a principal among others shall within the period of his probation pass the account test lower if he has not already passed it or account test for subordinate officers part i of madras. ..... the effect of that amendment has been to prescribe the passing of account test for executive officers as one of the requisite tests to be passed by a person for appointment to the cadre of principal of ayurveda college with effect from 19th september, 1964. ..... that case was disposed of by directing the government to make a regular appointment after deciding the question of eligibility of the second respondent's probation being declared on the basis of his having passed the account test for executive officers. ..... during the pendency of this writ petition the special rules have been amended as referred to already by a notification dated 19-1-1972, by adding the words 'or account test for executive officers' at the end of rule 6 and providing that the above amendment shall be deemed to come into force with effect from 19th september, 1964. .....

AshA. P. D/O K. Ponnamma Vs. State of Kerala Rep. by Secretary and ors ...

Court : Kerala

..... prior to the enactment of the kerala public services act, 1968, article 309 of the constitution provided for power with the state to frame law governing the conditions of service of a district judge also and in the absence of a law made by the state legislature, it was open to the government to ..... be a declaration that the amendment to the rule in question is prospective and does not affect the selection process initiated under the notification issued in 2007 and the exclusion of the petitioners as per the said amendment is illegal. ..... be true, he contends, that on account of some delay in passing the amendment, the formal amendment to the rules was gazetted only on 12.6.2008. ..... as the contention based on the amendment being relevant to vacancies which arose after the amendment is concerned, it is to be noted that as is clear from the notification in question issued in 2007, there were six vacancies prior to the amendment. ..... , learned counsel, would apart from reiterating the contentions, submit that the amendment of the rule being purely prospective, it could not interfere with the destiny of the applicants pursuant to the notification of the year 2007. ..... the fact that no such perception was entertained either by the high court or the state government, is clear from two circumstances:in the first place, the notification was issued by the high court in the year 2007, without prescribing the minimum or maximum age limit as was contained in the shetty commission and was accepted by the .....

Jacob M. Puthuparambil and Others Vs. Kerala Water Authority and Other ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1990SC2228; [1991(61)FLR696]; JT1990(4)SC27; 1990(2)KLT673(SC); 1990LabIC1918; (1991)IILLJ65SC; (1991)1SCC28; [1990]Supp1SCR562

..... that section reads as follows:amendment of act 19 of 1970-with effect from the date of publication of this act in the gazette, the kerala public service commission (additional functions as respects certain corporations and companies) act, 1970 (19 of 1970) shall have effect subject to the following amendment, namely:in clause (a) of section 2, the words and figures 'or the kerala water authority' established under section 3 of the kerala water supply and sewerage act 1986;', shall be added at the end.even though act 19 of 1970 stood so amended by the force of section 69, actual effect could be given after issuance of notification no. g.o. (ms) no. ..... nothing contained in this sub-section shall apply to an employee in the cadres of the administrative officers, financial assistants divisional accounts, typists and stenographers, who, by notice in writing given to the government and the authority within such time as the government may, by general or special order, specify, intimates his intention of not becoming an employee of the authority:provided further than an employee referred to in the preceding proviso shall continue to be an employee under the government and shall be provided elsewhere in any post or other service .....

C.M. Dinesh Mani Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... counter affidavit is filed on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 inter alia stating that kmbr, 2013 has been amended by the government in exercise of powers conferred by sections 381, 382, 387, 398 and 406 read with section 565 of the kerala municipality act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). ..... in the interest of the safety to life & property, these proposals may be considered while effecting any amendment to the kerala municipal building rules. ..... day of july, 2015 judgment shaffique, j these public interest litigations are filed by different individuals/organisations seeking for appropriate directions to declare certain provisions of kerala municipality building (amendment) rules, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as kmbr, 2013) as ultra vires articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of india and also seeking for directions to the government to amend the provisions of kerala municipality building rules, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as kmbr, 1999), after considering the report prepared by expert technical committee and after seeking suggestions ..... same is the position as far as h.v.hotels (p) ltd's case (supra) is concerned wherein the question involved was whether the floor area ratio given in the original sale deed by the government in favour of the hotels can be increased on account of a bye-law wp(c) no.20706/13 & conn.cases -:15:- which came into existence on a subsequent date. ..... [(2007) 2 scc468. .....

Roshanara Begum Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 61(1996)DLT206; 1996(36)DRJ34

..... we may refer to kaliyappan vs state of kerala, : air1989sc239 , where the supreme court has clearly held that under section 11a of the act, the words 'the collector shall make the award within a period of two years from the date of the publication of the declaration' mean that the collector is empowered to make an award till the expiry of the last date of the period of two years irrespective of the date on which the notice of the award is served upon the person interested in the land. ..... that because of this unusual and unexplained delay taking place in completing the acquisition proceedings for the land which was sought to be acquired for the delhi development authority, the parliament had intervened in 1984 and the land acquisition act was amended which made it clear that in respect of notifications issued prior to the enforcement of the amendment act the acquisition proceedings must be completed within two years of the coming into force of the amendment act and in respect of the future notification the time limit was also prescribed for making ..... the supreme court held that this submission was erroneous as the government in approving the award has to lake into consideration the provisions of the act and any grievance with regard to the quantum of compensation or any other grievance on account of compensation is capable of being remedied under the provisions of the act. .....

J. Veeraraghavan Vs. Lalith Kumar

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1995]83CompCas853(Mad)

..... in order to understand the ramifications of the questions posed in all facts, better it is, we think, to go into the objects and reasons for the re-introduction of chapter xvii of the act, by section 4 of the banking, public financial institutions and negotiable instruments laws (amendment) act, 1988 (act 66 of 1988), under a new nomenclature for the chapter of penalties in case of dishonour of certain cheques for insufficiency of funds in the accounts. 7. ..... with respect, we agree fully with the view expressed by the division bench of the bombay high court in the case of rakesh nemkumar porwal [1993] 78 comp cas 822; [1993] crl lj 680 of the kerala high court in the case of thomas varghese [1992] crl lj 3080 ; [1993] 76 comp cas 380 and a single judge of the rajasthan high court in the case of peary lal rajendra kumar pvt. ..... a single judge of the kerala high court in bhageerathy v. v. ..... ' (ii) a division bench of the kerala high court in thomas varghese v. p. .....

Malappuram District Parallel College Association and ors. Vs. Union of ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (2005)199CTR(Ker)453; 2006[2]STR321

..... they have referred to new article 21a introduced by constitution (86th amendment) act, 2002, which provides for free and compulsory education to children of the age of 6 to 14 years and the substituted article 45 which requires the state to endeavour to provide early childhood care and education for all children until they complete the age of six years. ..... ' means any training or coaching provided by a commercial training or coaching centre;(27) 'commercial training or coaching centre' means any institute or establishment providing commercial or coaching for imparting skill or knowledge or lessons on any subject or field other than the sports, with or without issuance of a certificate and includes coaching or tutorial classes but does not include pre-school coaching and training centre or any institute or establishment which issues any certificate or diploma or degree or any ..... : [2004]267itr9(sc) and division bench of this court in all kerala chartered accountants association v. ..... of course article 41 also provides that the state shall within its economic capacity and development make effective provision for securing the right to work to education and to public assistance in cases of unemployment, old age, etc. .....

Veeraraghavan Vs. Lalith Kumar

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1995CriLJ1882

..... . in order to understand the ramifications of the questions posed in all facts, better it is, we think, to go into the objects and reasons or the re-introduction of chapter xvii of the act, by section 4 of the banking public financial institutions and negotiable instruments laws (amendment) act, 1988 (act 66 of 1988) under a new nomenclature for the chapter 'of penalties in case of dishonour of certain cheques for insufficiency of funds in the accounts'. 9 ..... purposes of stressing that every cheque is bill of exchange and that every bill of exchange is an 'unconditional order' to pay the amount stated therein, the bench observed as follows :- 'reading these provisions with statement of objects and reasons of the banking public financial institutions and negotiable instruments law (amendment) act, 1988 (66 of 1988) whereby chapter 17 comprising of sections 138 to 142 were inserted with effect from 1-4-1989, there can be little doubt that section 138 was intended to be a provision to ..... . with respect, we agree fully with the view expressed by the division bench of the bombay high court in the case of rakesh parwal : 1994(3)bomcr355 of the kerala high court in the case of thomas verghese (db) and a single judge of the rajasthan high court in the case of m/s ..... .' (ii) a division bench of the kerala high court in thomas verghese v. p .....

Dynamic Orthopedics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Cochin, ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2010)229CTR(SC)317,[2010]321ITR300(SC),JT2010(3)SC176,2010(2)SCALE384,2010(2)LC985(SC)

..... if a company is a mat company, then be it a private limited company or a public limited company, for the purposes of section 115j of the act, the assessee-company has to prepare its profit and loss account in accordance with parts ii and iii of schedule vi to 1956 act alone. ..... section 115j [as it stood at the relevant time], inter alia, provided that where the total income of a company, as computed under the act in respect of any accounting year, was less than thirty per cent of its book profit, as defined in the explanation, the total income of the company, chargeable to tax, shall be deemed to be an amount equal to thirty per cent of such book profit. ..... in fact, by the companies (amendment) act, 1988, the linkage between the two has been expressly de-linked. ..... 66 of 1999 before the high court of kerala which held that section 115j of the act was introduced in assessment year 1988-1989 to take care of the phenomenon of prosperous `zero tax' companies which had continued despite the enactment of section 80vva of the act. ..... this was the view of the kerala high court in the case of commissioner of income tax v. ..... 378 (kerala), which high court's judgement stood reversed by the judgement of this court in the case of malayala manorama company limited v. ..... 378 (kerala), which has been wrongly reversed by this court in the case of malayala manorama company limited v. .....

Subhash Sharma and ors. and Firdauz Taleyarkhan Vs. Union of India (Uo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1991SC631; JT1990(4)SC245; 1990(2)SCALE836; 1991Supp(1)SCC574; [1990]Supp2SCR433; (1991)2UPLBEC826

..... the enhancement has been on account of the fact that in the judge strength of the high courts of calcutta, himachal pradesh, kamataka, madras and rajasthan had ten additions in all and the sanctioned strength of the kerala high court was reduced by two. ..... article 124(1) of the constitution provides:there shall be a supreme court of india consisting of a chief justice of india and, until parliament by law prescribes a larger number, of not more than seven other judges.from time to time the judge strength in the supreme court has been expanded and by the supreme court (number of judges) amendment act, 1983(22 of 1986), the existing number has been fixed at 25 apart from the chief justice. ..... soli sorabjee, the succeeding attorney general, withdrew the objection regarding this court's jurisdiction and made a statement that he was of the view that it was the constitutional obligation of the union of india to provide the sanctioned judge strength in the superior courts and the default, if any, was a matter of public interest and the writ petitions requiring a direction to the union of india to fill up the vacancies were maintainable.i4. ..... , on judicial independence, indeed, reflect the state of acute poverty and ignorance of the large masses of indian society and the consequent lack of awareness on their part of the niceties of the controversy and the general air of cynicism that degenerating standards in public-life has engendered in them.37. .....