Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the jharkhand agriculture university amendment act 2008 Page 99 of about 1,801 results (0.277 seconds)

Sep 06 2016 (HC)

Dr Arun Kumar Vs. Science and Technology

Court : Jharkhand

..... 16 (iv) the 4th ground taken by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner is that in letter dated 15th march, 2000 issued by the aicte was adopted by the state of jharkhand in the year 2003 and in pune university, it was adopted in the year 2006 i.e. ..... is on extension of probation be not terminated as evident from annexure-23 to the writ application and the petitioner vide letter dated 17.08.2013 replied to the show cause notice explaining in detail his qualifications and eligibility for being appointed as director, science and technology but the additional chief secretary science and technology proceeded on the basis of ex-parte report of the enquiry committee headed by the development commissioner, recommended for dispensing the services of the petitioner vide order dated 23.10.2013 (annexure-30 to the amended writ petition). ..... therefore, while issuing a show-cause notice, the authorities must take care to manifestly keep an open mind as they are to act fairly in adjudging the guilt or otherwise of the person proceeded against and specially when he has the power to take a punitive step against the person after giving him a show-cause notice.33. ..... however, in the present case, the advertisement does not mention that the two years experience must be after getting msc degree in agriculture. ..... union of india and others reported in (2008) 1 scc362 at paragraph nos. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 11 2017 (HC)

Kriti Kumari and Ors Vs. Personnel and Adminis Reform

Court : Jharkhand

..... iii, for sanskrit, urdu, farsi and arabic rs.9300 34800, arabic subjects bachelor s degree grade pay with minimum 45% marks in the rs.4600/ concerned subject, in which appointment is to be made, from an institute recognized by the state government or the central government or the university grants commission but bachelor s degree with minimum 40% marks in case of the candidates belonging to scheduled caste and 9 scheduled tribe. ..... now, if history/civics is read as history or civics or history and civics , by little change in phraseology it confirms to the qualification prescribed under the jharkhand appointment rules. 20. ..... 2004 rules 15 were amended vide notification dated 14.06.2008, whereunder requirement of 50% marks in the subject was reduced to 45%. ..... section 2 of the principal act was also amended. ..... panchpargnia, for the candidates kurmali, mundari, belonging to scheduled caste and kurukh, kharia, ho, scheduled tribe, bachelor s degree agriculture, santhali, with minimum 40% marks in the khorta and social concerned subject (in which science appointment is to be made) and b.ed. ..... by an amendment dated 12.10.2011, section 12 a has been inserted after section 12 in ncte act, 1993. ..... the executive instructions may supplement the rules in the areas which have been left open, however, an instruction which is contrary to the principal act or rules would be invalid. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 11 2017 (HC)

Hari Sharma and Ors Vs. Education

Court : Jharkhand

..... iii, for sanskrit, urdu, farsi and arabic rs.9300 34800, arabic subjects bachelor s degree grade pay with minimum 45% marks in the rs.4600/ concerned subject, in which appointment is to be made, from an institute recognized by the state government or the central government or the university grants commission but bachelor s degree with minimum 40% marks in case of the candidates belonging to scheduled caste and 9 scheduled tribe. ..... now, if history/civics is read as history or civics or history and civics , by little change in phraseology it confirms to the qualification prescribed under the jharkhand appointment rules. 20. ..... 2004 rules 15 were amended vide notification dated 14.06.2008, whereunder requirement of 50% marks in the subject was reduced to 45%. ..... section 2 of the principal act was also amended. ..... panchpargnia, for the candidates kurmali, mundari, belonging to scheduled caste and kurukh, kharia, ho, scheduled tribe, bachelor s degree agriculture, santhali, with minimum 40% marks in the khorta and social concerned subject (in which science appointment is to be made) and b.ed. ..... by an amendment dated 12.10.2011, section 12 a has been inserted after section 12 in ncte act, 1993. ..... the executive instructions may supplement the rules in the areas which have been left open, however, an instruction which is contrary to the principal act or rules would be invalid. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2017 (HC)

Umesh Jha Vs. Human Resources Department

Court : Jharkhand

..... of jharkhand 6.the sub divisional agricultural officer cum district 12 agriculture officer, khunti 7. ..... 188 of 2004 on 20.3.2008 in the case of bimal kumar sinha (supra) where following the judgment rendered by the apex court in the case of dhyan singh(supra) it was clearly held that past service under the adult education scheme could not be counted for the purposes of pensionary benefits.though the judgment rendered by the learned single judge in the case of bimal kumar sinha (w.p.s. no. ..... fulfilling the need of such passing-phase projects or schemes were to become a liability on the employer state by too liberally interpreting the labour laws in favour of the workmen, then the same may well act as a disincentive to 40 the state for floating such schemes and the state may opt to keep away from initiating such schemes and projects even in times of dire need, because it may feel that by opening the gates of welfare it would be letting in onerous obligations entailed upon it by extended application of the ..... 34 (iii) the doctrine of merger is not a doctrine of universal or unlimited application. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2017 (HC)

Smt Smriti Kana Sarkar Alias Smriti Kala Sarkar Vs. Human Resource Dev ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... of jharkhand 6.the sub divisional agricultural officer cum district 12 agriculture officer, khunti 7. ..... 188 of 2004 on 20.3.2008 in the case of bimal kumar sinha (supra) where following the judgment rendered by the apex court in the case of dhyan singh(supra) it was clearly held that past service under the adult education scheme could not be counted for the purposes of pensionary benefits.though the judgment rendered by the learned single judge in the case of bimal kumar sinha (w.p.s. no. ..... fulfilling the need of such passing-phase projects or schemes were to become a liability on the employer state by too liberally interpreting the labour laws in favour of the workmen, then the same may well act as a disincentive to 40 the state for floating such schemes and the state may opt to keep away from initiating such schemes and projects even in times of dire need, because it may feel that by opening the gates of welfare it would be letting in onerous obligations entailed upon it by extended application of the ..... 34 (iii) the doctrine of merger is not a doctrine of universal or unlimited application. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2017 (HC)

Santosh Kumar Sinha Vs. Human Resources Department

Court : Jharkhand

..... of jharkhand 6.the sub divisional agricultural officer cum district 12 agriculture officer, khunti 7. ..... 188 of 2004 on 20.3.2008 in the case of bimal kumar sinha (supra) where following the judgment rendered by the apex court in the case of dhyan singh(supra) it was clearly held that past service under the adult education scheme could not be counted for the purposes of pensionary benefits.though the judgment rendered by the learned single judge in the case of bimal kumar sinha (w.p.s. no. ..... fulfilling the need of such passing-phase projects or schemes were to become a liability on the employer state by too liberally interpreting the labour laws in favour of the workmen, then the same may well act as a disincentive to 40 the state for floating such schemes and the state may opt to keep away from initiating such schemes and projects even in times of dire need, because it may feel that by opening the gates of welfare it would be letting in onerous obligations entailed upon it by extended application of the ..... 34 (iii) the doctrine of merger is not a doctrine of universal or unlimited application. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2017 (HC)

Anil Kumar Upadhyay Vs. Human Resources Department

Court : Jharkhand

..... of jharkhand 6.the sub divisional agricultural officer cum district 12 agriculture officer, khunti 7. ..... 188 of 2004 on 20.3.2008 in the case of bimal kumar sinha (supra) where following the judgment rendered by the apex court in the case of dhyan singh(supra) it was clearly held that past service under the adult education scheme could not be counted for the purposes of pensionary benefits.though the judgment rendered by the learned single judge in the case of bimal kumar sinha (w.p.s. no. ..... fulfilling the need of such passing-phase projects or schemes were to become a liability on the employer state by too liberally interpreting the labour laws in favour of the workmen, then the same may well act as a disincentive to 40 the state for floating such schemes and the state may opt to keep away from initiating such schemes and projects even in times of dire need, because it may feel that by opening the gates of welfare it would be letting in onerous obligations entailed upon it by extended application of the ..... 34 (iii) the doctrine of merger is not a doctrine of universal or unlimited application. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2017 (HC)

Raja Ram Mahto Vs. Human Resource Development

Court : Jharkhand

..... of jharkhand 6.the sub divisional agricultural officer cum district 12 agriculture officer, khunti 7. ..... 188 of 2004 on 20.3.2008 in the case of bimal kumar sinha (supra) where following the judgment rendered by the apex court in the case of dhyan singh(supra) it was clearly held that past service under the adult education scheme could not be counted for the purposes of pensionary benefits.though the judgment rendered by the learned single judge in the case of bimal kumar sinha (w.p.s. no. ..... fulfilling the need of such passing-phase projects or schemes were to become a liability on the employer state by too liberally interpreting the labour laws in favour of the workmen, then the same may well act as a disincentive to 40 the state for floating such schemes and the state may opt to keep away from initiating such schemes and projects even in times of dire need, because it may feel that by opening the gates of welfare it would be letting in onerous obligations entailed upon it by extended application of the ..... 34 (iii) the doctrine of merger is not a doctrine of universal or unlimited application. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2017 (HC)

Binay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Human Resource Development

Court : Jharkhand

..... of jharkhand 6.the sub divisional agricultural officer cum district 12 agriculture officer, khunti 7. ..... 188 of 2004 on 20.3.2008 in the case of bimal kumar sinha (supra) where following the judgment rendered by the apex court in the case of dhyan singh(supra) it was clearly held that past service under the adult education scheme could not be counted for the purposes of pensionary benefits.though the judgment rendered by the learned single judge in the case of bimal kumar sinha (w.p.s. no. ..... fulfilling the need of such passing-phase projects or schemes were to become a liability on the employer state by too liberally interpreting the labour laws in favour of the workmen, then the same may well act as a disincentive to 40 the state for floating such schemes and the state may opt to keep away from initiating such schemes and projects even in times of dire need, because it may feel that by opening the gates of welfare it would be letting in onerous obligations entailed upon it by extended application of the ..... 34 (iii) the doctrine of merger is not a doctrine of universal or unlimited application. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2017 (HC)

Anil Kumar Jha and Ors Vs. Human Resources Department

Court : Jharkhand

..... of jharkhand 6.the sub divisional agricultural officer cum district 12 agriculture officer, khunti 7. ..... 188 of 2004 on 20.3.2008 in the case of bimal kumar sinha (supra) where following the judgment rendered by the apex court in the case of dhyan singh(supra) it was clearly held that past service under the adult education scheme could not be counted for the purposes of pensionary benefits.though the judgment rendered by the learned single judge in the case of bimal kumar sinha (w.p.s. no. ..... fulfilling the need of such passing-phase projects or schemes were to become a liability on the employer state by too liberally interpreting the labour laws in favour of the workmen, then the same may well act as a disincentive to 40 the state for floating such schemes and the state may opt to keep away from initiating such schemes and projects even in times of dire need, because it may feel that by opening the gates of welfare it would be letting in onerous obligations entailed upon it by extended application of the ..... 34 (iii) the doctrine of merger is not a doctrine of universal or unlimited application. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //