Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the jharkhand agriculture university amendment act 2008 Page 1 of about 1,801 results (0.262 seconds)

Jul 07 2017 (HC)

Nand Kishore Roy Vs. Agriculture Department

Court : Jharkhand

..... the provisions as contained in section 24 (iv) read with section 24(v) of the jharkhand agricultural university act, 2000 is to be taken into consideration and by conjoint reading of both the provisions would clearly show that the duties and responsibilities of the director, students' welfare cannot be confined only to the duties as it has been provided under the statute and the true effect for determination of the duties and responsibilities of the director, students' welfare is to be inferred from the assignment which has been made by the vice chancellor to the petitioner with respect to the teaching classes. ..... perform the following duties, namely:- (a) frame, amend and repeal the statute/regulations in the manner prescribed under this act; (b) review and consider the financial requirements and estimates for a university and approve its budget; 10 (c) approve the recommendation for appointment of officers, teachers and other staff of a university in the manner prescribed; (d) provide for the administration of any fund placed at the disposal of a university for the purpose intended; (e) arrange for the investment and withdrawal of funds of a university; (f) borrow money for capital improvement with the approval of the state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2007 (HC)

Dr. Vidyanand Sharma and ors. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1817; [2007(3)JCR385(Jhr)]

..... a conjoint reading of various provisions of the jharkhand agricultural universities act clearly embark upon the fact that the service conditions of the teachers/scientists and other employees of the university can only be laid by way of statutes, validly made by the authorities prescribed under the act. ..... 1084 adopted a resolution for enhancement of the age of superannuation of the teachers/scientists of the university from 60 years to 62 years and the same was sent to the chancellor of the universities for his assent to the amendment of clause 13.3(2) of the statutes, as required under section 36(2) of the jharkhand state universities act, 2000.4. ..... powers and duties of the board of management: the board of management shall exercise the following powers and shall perform the following duties, namely:(a) frame, amend and repeal the statute/regulations in the manner prescribed under this act.xx xx xx(c) approve the recommendation for appointment of officers, teachers and other staff of a university in the manner prescribed;xx xx xxunder section 20, the governor of the state of jharkhand is the chancellor of the university.chapter v deals with the service conditions of the teachers and staff whereas chapter vii deals with the funds and accounts and chapter viii .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 2016 (HC)

Rakesh Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand Through the Principal Secretary Ur ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... a combined reading of the notification dated 28th august, 2014 contained at annexure 2 with the gazette notification dated 5 th november, 2014 notifying the amendment to the rules leads to the conclusion that the provisions of rule 3(1) have been duly amended by the rule making authority in exercise of the powers conferred under section 590(1) of the jharkhand municipal act, 2011 and have come on the statute book. ..... subsequently, vide notification dated 22.10.2014 which was published in the jharkhand gazette on 05.11.2014, rule 3(1) was amended to the effect that the condition precedent for initiating a no confidence motion against deputy mayor/vice chairperson of municipal council, that the no confidence motion can be held only if the deputy mayor/vice chairperson was exercising powers and discharging functions of mayor/chairperson under section 32 of jharkhand municipal act, 2011, was deleted. ..... as indicated in the case of rajendra agricultural university vs. ..... in the rajendra agricultural university case, the supreme court has held; 19. ...... ..... 5 to 21 that notification dated 28.08.2014 was amended by notification dated 22.10.2014 which was duly published in jharkhand gazette on 05.11.2014, and thus the amended rule 3(1) would be the law governing the field, least to say, is simply 11 misconceived. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 2008 (HC)

Jharkhand Rajya Vishwavidyalaya Awam Mahavidyalaya Karmchari Sangh and ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(2)JCR471(Jhr)]

..... again amended by the jharkhand state universities (amendment) act, 2005 and the amended section 67(a) reads as under:notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any act, rules or any judgment or decree of a court, the date of retirement of teachers of university or college and those officers declared equivalent to them by the statute of the university, with effect from the date of notification of this act in the official gazette, shall be the date on which he/she attains the age of sixty-two years; the date of retirement of non-teaching employee shall be the date on which he/she attains the age of sixty years.9. according to the ..... after creation of the state of jharkhand, the said provision of section 67(a) was amended by the jharkhand state universities (amendment) act, 2002 and the amended section 67(a) read as under:in section 67, for sub-section (a), the following sub-section shall be substituted, namely:notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any act, rules or any judgment or decree of a court, the date of retirement of teaching and non-teaching employee of the university or of a college shall be the date on which he/she attains the age of sixty years.provided that appointment of teacher after retirement may be made in appropriate cases upto the age .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2008 (HC)

The Bihar Agriculture Marketing Board Employees Association Through It ...

Court : Patna

..... in our opinion, is wholly misplaced.it was also contended by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the amendment act is unreasonable for the reason that it does not spell out any object for the purpose for which the repeal was being enacted inasmuch as no preamble has been provided to the act and it has also been urged in that connection that with regard to the aims and objects following statement has been made:foi.ku i'kzn~ ..... various shades and colours but in substance, the contention was(a) that the impugned act has been enacted without application of mind and a colourable piece of legislation because the bihar agriculture produce market act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act of 1960') had been tested and upheld by the hon'ble supreme court as a reasonable restriction on freedom of marketing agriculture produce but before repealing that act of 1960, no enquiry has been made into the necessity of change in legislative policy in furtherance ..... of which act of 1960 had been enacted indicating that the repeal act has been enacted without application of mind.as a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 2007 (HC)

Balku Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR1426; [2008(2)JCR193(Jhr)]

..... rule 82(v) and rule 129(vi) of jharkhand agricultural produce market rules provide for appointment of agent by the market committee to collect market fees. ..... authorize any of its officers or staff or any other person to collect market fee directly from the buyer or his agent.subsequently, said rule 82 was amended in the year 1996 and in place of rule 82(v), as quoted above, the following rule was substituted:the market committee may authorize any of its officers or staff or any collecting agent whose appointment has been approved by the managing director of the board or an officer authorized by him in this behalf, to collect market fee directly from ..... since the policy decision for extension of the period of settlement has been taken up by the marketing board in view of the provisions of the agricultural marketing act and rules, the decision in vijay sen singh's case (supra) has got no application to the facts of the instant case.31. ..... 206 dated 8th march, 2007 (annexure-8) as the petitioners are entitled for extension of their settlement for another two terms of the financial years 2007-08 and 2008-09, similarly, like itki, itki station, mander, kurgi and chutupalu hats. ..... petitioners have also prayed for direction on the respondents to consider and pass appropriate order on their representations for extension of period of settlement of bero bazar for further two financial years till 2008-09.2. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2008 (SC)

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. (Obc Judgment)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR1292; 2008(3)CTC97; [2008(3)JCR176(SC)]; JT2008(5)SC1; (2008)3MLJ1105(SC); 2008(5)SCALE1; (2008)6SCC1; 2008AIRSCW2899; 2008(3)Supreme331; 2008(2)LH(SC)1534

..... the 14th amendment to the constitution of the united states of america and title vi of the 1964 civil rights act, prohibit universities to discriminate on the basis of classifications such as race, colour, national origin and the like in all their operations. ..... agricultural holdingsson(s) and daughter(s) ofpersons belonging to a family (father, mother andminor children) which owns only irrigated land which is equal to or more than85 per cent of the statutory area; or (a) both irrigated and unirrigated land, asfollows:- (i) the rule of exclusion will apply where theprecondition exists that the irrigated area (having been brought to a singletype under a common denominator) 40 per cent or more of the statutory ceilinglimit for irrigated land (this being calculated by excluding the unirrigatedportion). ..... - (i) income from salaries or agricultural landshall not be clubbed; (ii) the income criteria in terms of rupee will bemodified taking into account the change in its value every three years; ifthe situation, however, so demands, the interregnum may be less.explanation: wherever the expression 'permanentincapacitation' occurs in this schedule, it shall meanincapacitation whichresults in putting an officer outof service.154. ..... deemed as agricultural holding and hence, criteria at aabove under this category will apply. ..... agricultural labourers, rickshaw pullers/drivers, street hawkers etc. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 1998 (SC)

P.V. Narsimha Rao Vs. State (Cbi/Spe)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1998SC2120; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)157; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)762; 1997(1)BLJR263; 1998CriLJ2930; 1998(3)SCALE53; (1998)4SCC626; [1998]2SCR870

..... the court has also referred to the report of the committee, known as the santhanam committee, appointed by the government of india to suggest changes which would ensure speedy trial of cases of bribery, corruption and criminal misconduct and make the law otherwise more effective, which led to the amendments introduced in section 21 ipc by the anti corruption laws (amendment) act, 1964 as well as the statement made by shri hathi, minister- in-charge, while piloting in the lok sabha the bill which was enacted as the anti corruption laws (amendment) act, ..... or required to perform any public duty; (ix) any person who is the president, secretary or other office-bearer of a registered co-operative society engaged in agriculture, industry, trade or banking, receiving or having received any financial aid from the central government or a state government or from any corporation established by or under a central, provincial or state act, or any authority or body owned or controlled or aided by the government or a government company as defined in section 617 of the compnies act, 1956 (1 of 1956); (x) any person who is a chairman, member or ..... mandal, shibu soren, simon marandi and shailender mahto, members of the lok sabha owing allegiance to the jharkhand mukti morcha (the jmm), and ram lakhan singh yadav, ram sharan yadav, roshan lal, anadicharan das, abhay pratap singh and haji gulam mohammed, members of the lok sabha owing allegiance to the janata dal, ajit singh group (the j.d., a.s. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2008 (HC)

Hirabai Baburao Shidankar and Vitthal Baburao Shidankar Vs. Rayat Shik ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(2)BomCR350; (2008)110BOMLR3422

..... where such estate or land was released from management after the tillers day but before the commencement of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands (amendment) act, 1960, within one year from such commencement, and(b). ..... assertion and denial and consequent contest an issue arises in the context of the provisions of the tenancy act and which is required to be settled, decided and dealt with by the competent authority under the tenancy act, then notwithstanding the fact that such an issue arises in a properly constituted civil suit cognizable by the civil court, it would have to be referred to the competent authority under the tenancy act.the apex court has further observed:in a civil suit nomenclature of the issue as principal or subsidiary or substantial or incidental issue is hardly helpful ..... in our judgment, it is not possible to conclude that the supreme court intended to lay down that in the enquiry conducted by the collector under sub-section (2) of section 88b of the act, it is not necessary to serve any notice upon the tenant whose valuable property rights would be destroyed by grant of exemption certificate.it has been further observed that:in our judgment, the collector is bound to issue a notice to the tenant of the agricultural lands before holding an inquiry before granting exemption certificate under section 88b of the act.17. ..... to lands held or leased by a local authority, or university established by law in the bombay area of the state of maharashtra; and(b). .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 22 2008 (HC)

Arunraj M.R. and ors. Vs. Kerala Agricultural University and anr.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR2009Ker54; 2009(1)KLJ226

..... 752/74 issued under section 63 of the kerala agricultural university act, 1971 it is contended by the learned counsel that the dean can award only suitable punishment to students for acts of 'misdeameanour' for the purpose of maintaining discipline in the college and that too only after obtaining prior approval of the vice chancellor. ..... appellants who are studying in the college of veterinary and animal science under the kerala agricultural university were suspended from the college on the charge of ragging junior students. ..... p2 order on march 4, 2008 revoking the suspension with certain conditions, one of which was that 'the period of suspension from 31-10-2007 to the date of order (4-3-2008) shall be treated as absence for all academic programmes of the university'. ..... after holding an enquiry, the university imposed certain minor punishments, one of which was that the period of suspension from october 31, 2007 to march 4, 2008 shall be treated as absence for all 'academic programmes of the university'.2. ..... thus having regard to the entire facts and circumstances, we are satisfied that the university was justified in refusing to grant permission to the appellants to write the supplementary examinations which they could not write during the period of suspension from october 31, 2007 to march 4, 2008. ..... later, the appellants were arrested by the police and the sessions court, thrissur released them on bail by its order dated january 25,2008.9. ..... state of kerala 2008 (1) khc 164. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //