Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the jharkhand agriculture university amendment act 2008 Page 100 of about 1,801 results (0.177 seconds)

Jun 16 2017 (HC)

Surendra Prasad Rawani and Ors Vs. Human Resources Department

Court : Jharkhand

..... of jharkhand 6.the sub divisional agricultural officer cum district 12 agriculture officer, khunti 7. ..... 188 of 2004 on 20.3.2008 in the case of bimal kumar sinha (supra) where following the judgment rendered by the apex court in the case of dhyan singh(supra) it was clearly held that past service under the adult education scheme could not be counted for the purposes of pensionary benefits.though the judgment rendered by the learned single judge in the case of bimal kumar sinha (w.p.s. no. ..... fulfilling the need of such passing-phase projects or schemes were to become a liability on the employer state by too liberally interpreting the labour laws in favour of the workmen, then the same may well act as a disincentive to 40 the state for floating such schemes and the state may opt to keep away from initiating such schemes and projects even in times of dire need, because it may feel that by opening the gates of welfare it would be letting in onerous obligations entailed upon it by extended application of the ..... 34 (iii) the doctrine of merger is not a doctrine of universal or unlimited application. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2017 (HC)

Shyam Singh Vs. Finance

Court : Jharkhand

..... of jharkhand 6.the sub divisional agricultural officer cum district 12 agriculture officer, khunti 7. ..... 188 of 2004 on 20.3.2008 in the case of bimal kumar sinha (supra) where following the judgment rendered by the apex court in the case of dhyan singh(supra) it was clearly held that past service under the adult education scheme could not be counted for the purposes of pensionary benefits.though the judgment rendered by the learned single judge in the case of bimal kumar sinha (w.p.s. no. ..... fulfilling the need of such passing-phase projects or schemes were to become a liability on the employer state by too liberally interpreting the labour laws in favour of the workmen, then the same may well act as a disincentive to 40 the state for floating such schemes and the state may opt to keep away from initiating such schemes and projects even in times of dire need, because it may feel that by opening the gates of welfare it would be letting in onerous obligations entailed upon it by extended application of the ..... 34 (iii) the doctrine of merger is not a doctrine of universal or unlimited application. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2017 (HC)

Md Rahamatullah Vs. Finance

Court : Jharkhand

..... of jharkhand 6.the sub divisional agricultural officer cum district 12 agriculture officer, khunti 7. ..... 188 of 2004 on 20.3.2008 in the case of bimal kumar sinha (supra) where following the judgment rendered by the apex court in the case of dhyan singh(supra) it was clearly held that past service under the adult education scheme could not be counted for the purposes of pensionary benefits.though the judgment rendered by the learned single judge in the case of bimal kumar sinha (w.p.s. no. ..... fulfilling the need of such passing-phase projects or schemes were to become a liability on the employer state by too liberally interpreting the labour laws in favour of the workmen, then the same may well act as a disincentive to 40 the state for floating such schemes and the state may opt to keep away from initiating such schemes and projects even in times of dire need, because it may feel that by opening the gates of welfare it would be letting in onerous obligations entailed upon it by extended application of the ..... 34 (iii) the doctrine of merger is not a doctrine of universal or unlimited application. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2017 (HC)

Smt Basanti Sarkar Vs. Primary Secondary and Mass Education Department

Court : Jharkhand

..... of jharkhand 6.the sub divisional agricultural officer cum district 12 agriculture officer, khunti 7. ..... 188 of 2004 on 20.3.2008 in the case of bimal kumar sinha (supra) where following the judgment rendered by the apex court in the case of dhyan singh(supra) it was clearly held that past service under the adult education scheme could not be counted for the purposes of pensionary benefits.though the judgment rendered by the learned single judge in the case of bimal kumar sinha (w.p.s. no. ..... fulfilling the need of such passing-phase projects or schemes were to become a liability on the employer state by too liberally interpreting the labour laws in favour of the workmen, then the same may well act as a disincentive to 40 the state for floating such schemes and the state may opt to keep away from initiating such schemes and projects even in times of dire need, because it may feel that by opening the gates of welfare it would be letting in onerous obligations entailed upon it by extended application of the ..... 34 (iii) the doctrine of merger is not a doctrine of universal or unlimited application. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2017 (HC)

Ambika Prasad Vs. Human Resource Development

Court : Jharkhand

..... of jharkhand 6.the sub divisional agricultural officer cum district 12 agriculture officer, khunti 7. ..... 188 of 2004 on 20.3.2008 in the case of bimal kumar sinha (supra) where following the judgment rendered by the apex court in the case of dhyan singh(supra) it was clearly held that past service under the adult education scheme could not be counted for the purposes of pensionary benefits.though the judgment rendered by the learned single judge in the case of bimal kumar sinha (w.p.s. no. ..... fulfilling the need of such passing-phase projects or schemes were to become a liability on the employer state by too liberally interpreting the labour laws in favour of the workmen, then the same may well act as a disincentive to 40 the state for floating such schemes and the state may opt to keep away from initiating such schemes and projects even in times of dire need, because it may feel that by opening the gates of welfare it would be letting in onerous obligations entailed upon it by extended application of the ..... 34 (iii) the doctrine of merger is not a doctrine of universal or unlimited application. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2017 (HC)

Sitaram Vs. Human Resources Department

Court : Jharkhand

..... of jharkhand 6.the sub divisional agricultural officer cum district 12 agriculture officer, khunti 7. ..... 188 of 2004 on 20.3.2008 in the case of bimal kumar sinha (supra) where following the judgment rendered by the apex court in the case of dhyan singh(supra) it was clearly held that past service under the adult education scheme could not be counted for the purposes of pensionary benefits.though the judgment rendered by the learned single judge in the case of bimal kumar sinha (w.p.s. no. ..... fulfilling the need of such passing-phase projects or schemes were to become a liability on the employer state by too liberally interpreting the labour laws in favour of the workmen, then the same may well act as a disincentive to 40 the state for floating such schemes and the state may opt to keep away from initiating such schemes and projects even in times of dire need, because it may feel that by opening the gates of welfare it would be letting in onerous obligations entailed upon it by extended application of the ..... 34 (iii) the doctrine of merger is not a doctrine of universal or unlimited application. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2017 (HC)

Murari Prasad Vs. Human Resources Department

Court : Jharkhand

..... of jharkhand 6.the sub divisional agricultural officer cum district 12 agriculture officer, khunti 7. ..... 188 of 2004 on 20.3.2008 in the case of bimal kumar sinha (supra) where following the judgment rendered by the apex court in the case of dhyan singh(supra) it was clearly held that past service under the adult education scheme could not be counted for the purposes of pensionary benefits.though the judgment rendered by the learned single judge in the case of bimal kumar sinha (w.p.s. no. ..... fulfilling the need of such passing-phase projects or schemes were to become a liability on the employer state by too liberally interpreting the labour laws in favour of the workmen, then the same may well act as a disincentive to 40 the state for floating such schemes and the state may opt to keep away from initiating such schemes and projects even in times of dire need, because it may feel that by opening the gates of welfare it would be letting in onerous obligations entailed upon it by extended application of the ..... 34 (iii) the doctrine of merger is not a doctrine of universal or unlimited application. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2017 (HC)

Bipin Kumar Jha Vs. Human Resource Development

Court : Jharkhand

..... of jharkhand 6.the sub divisional agricultural officer cum district 12 agriculture officer, khunti 7. ..... 188 of 2004 on 20.3.2008 in the case of bimal kumar sinha (supra) where following the judgment rendered by the apex court in the case of dhyan singh(supra) it was clearly held that past service under the adult education scheme could not be counted for the purposes of pensionary benefits.though the judgment rendered by the learned single judge in the case of bimal kumar sinha (w.p.s. no. ..... fulfilling the need of such passing-phase projects or schemes were to become a liability on the employer state by too liberally interpreting the labour laws in favour of the workmen, then the same may well act as a disincentive to 40 the state for floating such schemes and the state may opt to keep away from initiating such schemes and projects even in times of dire need, because it may feel that by opening the gates of welfare it would be letting in onerous obligations entailed upon it by extended application of the ..... 34 (iii) the doctrine of merger is not a doctrine of universal or unlimited application. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2017 (HC)

Surun Soren and Anr Vs. Human Resources Department

Court : Jharkhand

..... of jharkhand 6.the sub divisional agricultural officer cum district 12 agriculture officer, khunti 7. ..... 188 of 2004 on 20.3.2008 in the case of bimal kumar sinha (supra) where following the judgment rendered by the apex court in the case of dhyan singh(supra) it was clearly held that past service under the adult education scheme could not be counted for the purposes of pensionary benefits.though the judgment rendered by the learned single judge in the case of bimal kumar sinha (w.p.s. no. ..... fulfilling the need of such passing-phase projects or schemes were to become a liability on the employer state by too liberally interpreting the labour laws in favour of the workmen, then the same may well act as a disincentive to 40 the state for floating such schemes and the state may opt to keep away from initiating such schemes and projects even in times of dire need, because it may feel that by opening the gates of welfare it would be letting in onerous obligations entailed upon it by extended application of the ..... 34 (iii) the doctrine of merger is not a doctrine of universal or unlimited application. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2017 (HC)

Pradhan Mahto Vs. Human Resources Department

Court : Jharkhand

..... of jharkhand 6.the sub divisional agricultural officer cum district 12 agriculture officer, khunti 7. ..... 188 of 2004 on 20.3.2008 in the case of bimal kumar sinha (supra) where following the judgment rendered by the apex court in the case of dhyan singh(supra) it was clearly held that past service under the adult education scheme could not be counted for the purposes of pensionary benefits.though the judgment rendered by the learned single judge in the case of bimal kumar sinha (w.p.s. no. ..... fulfilling the need of such passing-phase projects or schemes were to become a liability on the employer state by too liberally interpreting the labour laws in favour of the workmen, then the same may well act as a disincentive to 40 the state for floating such schemes and the state may opt to keep away from initiating such schemes and projects even in times of dire need, because it may feel that by opening the gates of welfare it would be letting in onerous obligations entailed upon it by extended application of the ..... 34 (iii) the doctrine of merger is not a doctrine of universal or unlimited application. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //