Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the chhattisgarh regularisation of unauthorised development act 2002 Page 1 of about 416 results (0.076 seconds)

Kapilaben Ashokbhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and 3 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2006)2GLR1029

..... (1) this act may be called the gujarat regularisation of unauthorised development act, 2001(2) it shall be deemed to have come into force on the 22nd november, 2000.section 2 defines certain terms :-(1) in this act, unless the context otherwise requires,-(a) sarea development authority means the authority constituted under section 5 of the gujarat town planning and urban development act, 1976 (hereinafter in this section referred to as sthe gujarat act);(b) xxx xxx xxx xxx(c) designated authority means the commissioner, the area development authority or, as the case may be, urban development authority; (d) xxx xxx xxx xxx(e) development area ..... it is his say that the prayer of the petitioner cannot be accepted because the act was meant for one year initially, but thereafter it was extended upto 2002 and lastly upto the year 2003. ..... unfortunately the copies that were provided to us of these notifications were not legible at places and, therefore, we have referred to the original notifications, which show that by gujarat regularisation of unauthorized development [amendment] act, 2002, several amendments have been introduced. ..... later on, by issuing notifications the term was extended, at first instance upto 2002 and later on upto september 2003. ..... 2 by his order which was communicated to the petitioner by forwarding letter dated 12th february, 2002. ..... 2 rejected the application by order dated 12th february, 2002. .....

Munimasthaiah Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1995KAR2323; 1996(1)KarLJ57

..... , in relation to which a notification under the bangalore development authority act, 1976, or under section 17 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987, or under section 15 of the karnataka improvement boards act, 1976, is published and which has not yet vested in favour of any authority for which the acquisition is proposed, may, on the application of such person made within sixty days of the commencement of this act, be regularised in accordance with the provisions of this act'.it is not disputed that the time to make the application for regularization of unauthorised constructions was extended from time ..... be regularised; namely,-(i) unauthorised constructions coming in the way of existing or proposed roads and railwaylines, communications and other civic facilities or public utilities;(ii) unauthorised construction or any portion thereof falling within the required set off, if any, from roads, railway fines, communications and other civic facilities or public utilities under the rules, bye-laws or regularizations governing buildings;(iii) unauthorised constructions made in forest land or on tank bed;(iv) unauthorised constructions made in the area specified as green belt in the comprehensive development plan or outline development .....

Pranjivan Harjivan Parmar Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2003)3GLR2516

..... 3, 5 and 9 of the impugned act pursuant to the gujarat regularisation of unauthorised development (amendment) act, 2002, which received assent of the governor on 6th april, 2002 :'3(2)(aa) where an unauthorised development in urban development area or development area has been carried out at any time before the 22nd november, 2000 and the development has been wholly destroyed by the earthquake or rendered substantially and permanently unfit for the purpose of occupation due to the earthquake in the gujarat on 26th january, 2001 and the owner or occupier of such development intends to carry out development, at the same place and with the same built-up area as existed prior ..... to such destruction, the .....

Rajesh Kumar Yadav Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 141(2007)DLT493

..... delhi development authority 66(1997) dlt 482(db), noting the argument 'that there is any public policy to regularise unauthorised colonies or there is a policy decision not to acquire built up area, are concluded against the petitioner by a division bench decision of this court in the case of attar singh v ..... attention has also been drawn to subsequent nothings dealing with acquiring the entire tract of land in the face of the likelihood of regularisation of unauthorised colonies. ..... it will be for the beneficiary of the acquisition to move the competent authority under the development act and obtain the sanction of the said authority for suitable modification of the master plan so as to permit the use of the land for the public purpose for which the land is acquired. ..... adm/lac (north-west) vide his letter dt.25.6.2002 (p 29/c) had forwarded the draft notification under section 4 in respect of land measuring approximately 3000 hectare adjacent to the land already acquired for rohini residential scheme (p 28/c) ..... governor/administrator was subjectively satisfied of the expediency of this measure.i agree to the proposal at 'a' prepage for the issue of notification under section 6.for exclusion of the heavily built up areas, which the government has agreed to regularise, we should make use of the aerial photographs of march 2002. ..... : [2002]255itr147(sc) , as is evident from the following extract:9 ..... from secretary (landb) to divisional commissioner, dt.9.4.2002 (p24/c) and 17.6.2002 (p 27/c). .....

Khushi Seva Sanstha (Regd) Vs. the State and ors

Court : Delhi

..... clusters in delhi in accordance with the provisions of the delhi urban shelter improvement board act, 2010 and the master plan for delhi, 2021 to ensure its development in a sustainable, planned and humane manner; (b) scheme and orderly arrangements for regulation of urban street vendors in consonance with the national policy for urban street vendors and hawkers as provided in the master plan for delhi, 2021; (c) orderly arrangements pursuant to guidelines and regulations for regularisation of unauthorised colonies, village abadi area ..... any judgment, decree or order of any court, status quo(i) as on the 1st day of january, 2006 in respect of encroachment or unauthorized development; (ii) in respect of unauthorized colonies, village abadi area (including urban villages) and their extensions, which existed on the 31st day of march, 2002 and where construction took place even beyond that date and up to the 8 th day of february, 2002, mentioned in sub-section (1); (iii) in respect of special areas as per the building regulations for special area, unauthorized regularized colonies .....

Bangalore Electricity Supply Co. Vs. Karnataka Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2008)LCAPTEL164

..... to good monsoon, availability of power from hydro sources was substantially high and therefore, requested revision of source-wise power purchase quantity and cost and that the appellant failed to provide the said revised data and the same was subsequently furnished by state power procurement coordination centre (sppcc) who was acting on behalf of the appellants.he stated that in the said revised data, the quantum of power to be purchased has been increased by 2022 mu which was not substantiated ..... to meet the ever increasing demand consequent to development and improvement in the status of the consumer public, industrialization, computerization, heavy industries and requirement increases by geometric proportion, it is for the transmission utility or such other utility to estimate the future demands as well, besides improving the quality and standard of maintenance. ..... while considering the tariff revision for the year 2002-03 we direct the commission to bear this fact in mind. ..... 720 crores which pertain to the previous periods namely from 2002-03 to 2005-06. .....

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2006)4CompLJ450(SC); 111(2004)DLT345(SC); 2004(5)SCALE405; (2004)6SCC588

..... in the various orders passed in the year 1995, this court noticed that a large number of industries were located in residential/non-conforming areas in violation of the delhi master plan formulated under the delhi development act, 1957 (for short, 'dd act), delhi municipal corporation act, 1957 (for short, 'dmc' act) and other statutory provisions. ..... insofar as union of india is concerned having already taken a contrary stand as above noticed, it adopted a middle path without clearly supporting or opposing the delhi government on the issue of insitu regularization by taking a stand that it has issued guidelines and would consider the question of insitu regularisation at the time of finalisation of master plan - 2021. ..... the proposal was considered by delhi development authority on 20th december, 2002. ..... governor to grant ad hoc registration to units which had unauthorisedly established themselves in non-conforming areas till 31st december, 1989. ..... the note dated 20th december, 2002 notices that a large number of industrial clusters are existing in various parts of the national capital territory of delhi in contravention of land use provisions of the mpd - 2001 and thereby facing the problem in their continuance on their existing site and with a view to resolve this problem a policy needs to be evolved for regularization/redevelopment of the said industrial clusters so that it may eventually be considered to be part of the mpd - 2021. .....

Shubh Apartments Chs Ltd. Vs. the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mum ...

Court : Mumbai

..... (2006) 7 scc 597, holds that construction made in the teeth of the notice issued for stopping unauthorised construction cannot be regularised as no construction made in violation of the municipal act can be regularised. 10. ..... that would violate the act itself and the development control regulations, 1991 (dcr) thereunder which also cannot be permitted by regularising such construction. 19. ..... (in this case several builders / developers of several buildings on the same plot under the same layout, such as the plaintiffs developer exchanged fsis, and yet allowed other builders to continue blatantly unauthorised construction). 15. ..... the plaintiff allowed its own fsi to be jeopardized, though purchased, by not heeding the unauthorised construction of those developers on the same plot who had no such fsi or who had sold such fsi to the plaintiff. 18. ..... the plaintiff had full knowledge of the blatantly unauthorised construction which went on same plot of land for other buildings near the plaintiff's building by the other developers who had no fsi for such construction. ..... builders violate with impunity the sanctioned building plans and indulge in deviations much to the prejudice of the planned development of the city and at the peril of the occupants of the premises constructed or of the inhabitants of the city at large. .....

John B. James and Others Vs. Bangalore Development Authority and Anoth ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2000KAR4134; 2001(1)KarLJ364

..... 4 of 2000); 'kmc act' for karnataka municipal corporations act, 1976; 'planning act' for karnataka town and country planning act, 1961; 'public premises act' for karnataka public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1974; and 'regularisation act' for karnataka regularisation of unauthorised constructions in urban areas act, 1991.1.1 these petitions have been heard with several other batches relating to other layouts of bda, the common factor being the relief sought, based on section 38-c(2) of the bda act, which was inserted by karnataka act 1 of 2000. ..... , 1995 and has continued to be in possession of the land as on the date of commencement of the bangalore development authority (amendment) act, 1999; (ii) the allottee makes payment towards the allotment of land, such amount as the authority may, subject to the general or special order of the government determine from time to time; and (iii) the total extent of the land allotted under this sub-section together with the land already held by the allottee shall not exceed the ceiling limit specified under section 4 of the urban land (ceiling and regulation .....

B.T. Sakku Vs. the Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority, Bang ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1995Kant192; ILR1994KAR3267; 1995(1)KarLJ361

..... is not competent to oust the plaintiff from the suit land in view of the government order of 1986 and fn the light of the provisions of the karnataka regularisation of unauthorised constructions fn urban 'areas act 1991. ..... i may also point out here that in view of the karnataka regularisation of unauthorised construction in urban area act, 1991, the earlier government orders do not hold the field now. ..... hud 775 mnx 87 dated 27-9-1990 as also the karnataka regularisation of unauthorised construction in urban area act, 1991 (karnataka act no. ..... procedure on completion of scheme (1) when a development scheme has been prepared, the authority shall draw up a notification stating the fact of a scheme having been made and the limits of the area comprised therein, and naming a place where particulars of the scheme, a map of the area comprised therein, a statement specifying the land which is proposed to be acquired and of the land in regard to which a betterment tax may be levied may he seen at all reasonable hours. ..... in fact, this aspect has been spoken to by dw-1 rajanna, an official of the bangalore development authority. .....