Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the chhattisgarh regularisation of unauthorised development act 2002 Court: delhi Page 1 of about 35 results (0.098 seconds)

Khushi Seva Sanstha (Regd) Vs. the State and ors

Court : Delhi

..... clusters in delhi in accordance with the provisions of the delhi urban shelter improvement board act, 2010 and the master plan for delhi, 2021 to ensure its development in a sustainable, planned and humane manner; (b) scheme and orderly arrangements for regulation of urban street vendors in consonance with the national policy for urban street vendors and hawkers as provided in the master plan for delhi, 2021; (c) orderly arrangements pursuant to guidelines and regulations for regularisation of unauthorised colonies, village abadi area ..... any judgment, decree or order of any court, status quo(i) as on the 1st day of january, 2006 in respect of encroachment or unauthorized development; (ii) in respect of unauthorized colonies, village abadi area (including urban villages) and their extensions, which existed on the 31st day of march, 2002 and where construction took place even beyond that date and up to the 8 th day of february, 2002, mentioned in sub-section (1); (iii) in respect of special areas as per the building regulations for special area, unauthorized regularized colonies .....

Rajesh Kumar Yadav Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 141(2007)DLT493

..... delhi development authority 66(1997) dlt 482(db), noting the argument 'that there is any public policy to regularise unauthorised colonies or there is a policy decision not to acquire built up area, are concluded against the petitioner by a division bench decision of this court in the case of attar singh v ..... attention has also been drawn to subsequent nothings dealing with acquiring the entire tract of land in the face of the likelihood of regularisation of unauthorised colonies. ..... it will be for the beneficiary of the acquisition to move the competent authority under the development act and obtain the sanction of the said authority for suitable modification of the master plan so as to permit the use of the land for the public purpose for which the land is acquired. ..... adm/lac (north-west) vide his letter dt.25.6.2002 (p 29/c) had forwarded the draft notification under section 4 in respect of land measuring approximately 3000 hectare adjacent to the land already acquired for rohini residential scheme (p 28/c) ..... governor/administrator was subjectively satisfied of the expediency of this measure.i agree to the proposal at 'a' prepage for the issue of notification under section 6.for exclusion of the heavily built up areas, which the government has agreed to regularise, we should make use of the aerial photographs of march 2002. ..... : [2002]255itr147(sc) , as is evident from the following extract:9 ..... from secretary (landb) to divisional commissioner, dt.9.4.2002 (p24/c) and 17.6.2002 (p 27/c). .....

Manju Bhatia Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1996IVAD(Delhi)141; 63(1996)DLT894; 1996(39)DRJ58

..... the guidelines issued by the central government under section 41 of the delhi development act and appendix 'j' of the bye-laws have the force of law. ..... it is stated that the unauthorised constructions from 8th to 11th floor and specified area of 12th floor, was beyond the sanctioned plan and in violation of the provisions of the punjab municipal act and building bye-laws. ..... the learned single judge took the view that if the building or part thereof had been constructed unauthorisedly but the construction was within the permissible far, the same will have to be compounded by the n.d.m.c. ..... it is urged that the construction made during the currency of the guidelines of 1988, the applicable criteria ought to be 250 far and if the same is applied to the additional four floors constructed without sanctioned plan, the same would be within compoundable limits and deserve to be regularised. ..... but if it is contemplated that every subsequent transferee or occupier is required to be given notice at every step, then it would just amount to allowing raising of the construction unauthorisedly and thereafter bringing one person after the other in the family or his successor in interest to file suits and petitions. ..... considerations of public interest and larger interest of the society in not permitting this edifice of unauthorised construction to remain, far out-weigh the financial hardship and inconvenience that may be caused to the affluent purchasers of these flats. .....

Smt. Renu Bali Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 128(2006)DLT204

..... the delhi development authority has also been empowered under the provisions of section 57 read with section 11 of the delhi development act to make the regulations to carry out the object of the act with the previous approval of the central government. ..... above.12.3 if the applicant does not pay the subsequent installments before the due date, the allocation of the flat in the scheme will be automatically cancelled and the amount deposited till date will be refunded to the party after deducting 10% of the amount of the registration deposit.handing over possession14.1 the allottee shall be entitled to take delivery of the possession only after he has completed all the formalities, paid all dues and furnished/executed all the documents as required in the allotment-cum-demand letter or the delhi development authority (management ..... of construction + land premium + api, if any.on cost of construction + land premium+ api, if any.the said demand for payment of current cost was challenged in the writ petitions filed on the ground that when provision was made for condensation of delay in making payment of interest at a higher rate for regularising the same and when the allotment was restored by revoking the cancellation, the registrants were put back to the original position and, thereforee, costing could have been revised only by directing ..... ashok kumar bahl reported in : 2002(145)elt287(sc) .47. ..... dda (lpa 727/2002 decided on 15.12.2003). .....

Super Electricals Vs. Delhi State Industrial Development Corporation L ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2005(2)CTLJ225(Del); 124(2005)DLT268

..... the orders dated july 8, 1996 the apex court had noted that the master plan of delhi 1962 mpd 62 had been enforced under the delhi development act, ..... also been argued by the respondents that some petitioners were operating from local commercial areas and thereforee, did not require relocation, as they stood covered by the relocation development scheme under the delhi master plan, 2001 ..... in respect of industrial units which have come up between 1st august, 1990 to 31st december, 1996, it was suggested that the bigger units having more than 20 workers may first be directed to be closed, later the units having workers between 10 and 19 and last of all those units which have less than 10 workers be directed to ..... given which read as follows:i.a review of all the cases in which provisional eligibility letters have been issued is required to be undertaken by the dsidc immediately so as to identify the following categories which are not to be considered for allotment under the relocation scheme:-ii.units situated in commercial areas.iii.units located in anand parbat, samaipur baadli and shahdara as these areas are covered by the redevelopment scheme under the delhi master plan-2001.iv.service sector industries such ..... dsidc letter dated april 8, 2002, was on the subject of ?ophysical possession of the plot at bawana industrial area against ..... the purposes of this petition we need to refer to the order passed in m.c.mehta v union of india, : (2002) ..... india, : (2002)9scc534 8. ..... india, : (2002)9scc481 7. .....

Dharambir Khattar Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 159(2009)DLT636

..... his attempt at stopping the demolition of an unauthorised lift was contrary to the very object of the dd act which was to prevent unplanned development and the construction of buildings in contravention of the master plan for delhi (mpd) or the lay-out or sanctioned building plan as the case may be. ..... a comparison is also drawn with a similarly worded provision, section 34 of the prevention of terrorism act 2002 (pota) which was interpreted in state v. ..... in the second week of december 2002, m/s a.p.y.hoteliers & developers commenced construction work for the installation of the lift. ..... on the receipt of the said complaint the officer on special duty (osd) to the vice chairman, dda marked the complaint to the director (buildings) (dda) on 17th december, 2002. ..... 32-33, paschim vihar, delhi.34.5 it appears that on 14th december, 2002, soon after the work on the construction of the lift commenced, a complaint was made to the sho, police station paschim vihar by m/s surya estates pvt. ..... '34.4 m/s a.p.y.hoteliers & developers entered into an agreement dated 2nd november, 2002 with eisa lifts pvt. ..... prevention of terrorism act, 2002 34. ..... it must be mentioned at this stage that the interception of the calls on the phones used by the accused subhash sharma, vice-chairman dda, commenced on 20th december 2002. ..... an inspection of the site was undertaken by the dda officials on 23rd december, 2002. ..... by cheque dated 2nd november, 2002. .....

Jaidev S/O Shri Ganesh Lal Vs. Indira Gandhi National Open University ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 102(2003)DLT234

..... it was said that as regards future expansion, ignou had appointed a cadre review committee, which has since submitted its report the cadre review committee (as stated in an affidavit filed in may, 2002) was to look into (i) the workload, (ii) the staffing pattern, present and future requirements, (iii) the qualifications for each post, (iv) promotional avenues for each post.12. ..... delhi state mineral development corporation : (1990)illj320sc which reads as follows:'.....practical experience would always aid the person to effectively discharge the duties and is a sure guide to assess the suitability. ..... but if the initial entry itself is unauthorised and is not against any sanctioned vacancy, question of regularizing the incumbent on such a non-existing vacancy would never survive for consideration and even if such purported regularization or confirmation is given it would be an exercise in futility. ..... thereafter, in paragraph 25 of the report, it was stated:'as would be evident from the observations made and directions given in the above two cases, the court must, while giving such directions, act with due care and caution. ..... - subject to the provisions of this act, the statutes may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:- (a) to (c) xxx xxx xxx (d) the appointment of teachers and other employees of the university, their emoluments and other conditions of service; (e) to (l) xxx xxx xxx'30. .....

Central Engineering Service Class I (Dr) Association Through Its Addit ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT300

..... are concerned with' as explained in the letter dated 4th june, 1999 sent by the secretary in the ministry of urban development to the chairman of the upsc, the unusual features are: there was consistent under-recruitment of aees; to continue the (smooth or efficient) working of the department it was necessary to promote aes far in excess of their quota; non-regularization of the services of the aes led to frustration amongst them; a situation arose whereby many of the executive engineers from amongst the aes continued in an ad hoc capacity ..... regularisation of diploma-holder assistant engineers who are working as executive engineers on ad hoc basis against vacancies which occurred after the promulgation of the 1996 rules will have to be made in accordance with the provisions of the ..... 2002) raised certain additional submissions, such as that the petitioners were setting up a new case, which was not permissible; the writ petition ought not to be entertained on the grounds of delay and laches; and, the petitioners have failed to implead necessary parties in the ..... stat : air1997sc412 particularly paragraphs 22 and 29 of the report to submit that when an act of parliament is repealed, 'it must be considered, except as to transactions past and closed, as if ..... the effect thereof is to obliterate the act completely from the record of parliament as if it had never been passed; it never existed except for the purpose of those actions which were commenced, prosecuted and concluded while it .....

Avtar Vinayak Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 152(2008)DLT486; 2008(106)DRJ440

..... 8, who at the relevant time, was the president of the society as being contrary to the provisions of the delhi cooperative societies act, rules and bye-laws of the society. ..... moreover, the application dated 4th february, 2002 quoted in the preceding para clearly mentioned the factum of construction of four flats. ..... respondent no3-society vide letter dated 4th february, 2002 applied for regularization of four flats which is reproduced for facility of reference:the permission of increasing of four flats and n.o.c was granted by lease administration co.op.group housing society d.d.a vide letter no. ..... the inferences sought to be drawn by the petitioner based on the standard format print out of letter dated 7th march, 2002 are misplaced. ..... 3-society had suppressed from the dda the fact that flats were occupied even before the sanction was accorded on 7th march, 2002. mr. ..... as per the respondents' own case, sanction was obtained on 7th march, 2002 while possession of flat nos.a-02 a03, a04 and a05 was handed over on 30th november, 2001, 16th november, 2002, 28th september, 2001 and 7th august, 2001 respectively. ..... 1-dda has also explained that sanction accorded on 7th march, 2002 was in the printed form. ..... 3.88 lacs in the audit report for the year 2001-2002. .....

T.N. Vohra and ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2004(74)DRJ273

..... in view of the aforesaid, i am of the considered view that the present petition is an abuse of the process of the court, the petitioners have not come with clean hands before this court and attempts have been made on the part of the petitioners to prevent the respondents from taking over the possession of the land in question in accordance with law by even producing interpolated orders. ..... the counter-affidavit goes on to state that a programme was fixed on 10.2.2003 for taking over possession of land and that the group -4 misguided the respondent authorities by handing over a dim copy of the order dated 26.9.2002 passed in cm 984/2002 in civil writ petition 5780/2002. ..... it is thus alleged that the petitioners have in fact tampered with the order to produce that as an obstruction to possession being taking over which calls for the petition to be dismissed at threshold and petitioners be punished for the contemptuous act. 10. ..... the notifications for acquisition of land were issued under the provisions of the land acquisition act, 1894 ( hereinafter to be referred to as `the l.a. ..... 33/86-87 in the year 1986 for planned development of delhi. ..... it is, thus, further stated that the petitioners could not have purchased the land and the same is void ab initio being in contravention of the provisions ions of delhi land (restriction on transfer) act, 1971. 9. ..... the said act is thus clearly contemptuous. 24. ..... act' ), but the same were dismissed. ..... act. .....