Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tezpur university act 1993 section 11 the chancellor Page 9 of about 2,249 results (0.250 seconds)

Chairman, Sarv Hitkar Educational Society and Another Vs. Jasvir Singh

Court : Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh

..... these judgments are not applicable. this is a case of refund of fee and it has been specifically mentioned by the honble supreme court in maharshi dayanand university v. surjeet kaur?, 2010(2) cpc 696 s.c., relying upon all earlier judgments held that education is not a commodity. educational institutions are not ..... the opposite parties, who filed written statement taking preliminary objections that the complainant is not entitled to get any refund as per the policy of the university as well as guidelines of all india council of technical education (in short aicte), the complainant joined and attended the classes for the ist semester, ..... service. such matters cannot be entertained by the consumer forum under the consumer protection act, 1986. further honble supreme court in bihar school examination board versus suresh prasad sinha?, 2010 (1) clt 255 (sc) observed that the education boards and universities are not service provider and the complaints against them are not maintainable. the .....

income-tax Officer Vs. Jay Laxmi Foundry

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in : (1991)38ITD323(Ahd.)

..... and undertaking job work. the business of the assessee had no connection with computer science. in the course of business management which the partner was to pursue at american university the subjects were as submitted before the income-tax officer, computer science, economics, operation research, computer programming, automatic and speedy process management, systems, analysis, etc. the ..... 1986-87 the assessee had incurred expenses of rs. 80,953 and the return of the assessee was accepted by the department under section 143(1) of the act. mere fact that the return of subsequent year was accepted under section 143(1) would not mean that the expenses for assessment year 1984-85 were allowable. ..... the business of the assessee. considering the entire circumstances, we hold that the expenses in question were not allowable as deduction under section 37(1) of the act. the learned cit(a) has not at all applied his mind to the facts of the case and his order cannot be sustained.12. we may mention .....

K. Srinivasan and others Vs. Executive Officer, Cantonment Board, Sec' ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(2)ALD209; 2000(1)ALT353

..... creatures. part iv-a on fundamental duties has been added by the constitution (42nd amendment) act, 1976 in accordance with the recommendations of the swaransingh committee bringing the constitution in line with article 29(1) of the universal declaration of human rights and the constitution of china, japan and ussr.the mandate of ..... the 1st respondent, the petitioners requested the station health officer, military hospital, cantonment who inspected the complex in question and gave report dated 27-7-1993 endorsing the allegations levelled by the petitioners.2. apart from the sewage problem, the petitioners stated that due to the continuous pumping of underground water since ..... this situation creates health. hazards to the residents of krishnapuri colony. the petitioners brought this matter to the notice of sub-area commander on 20-5-1993 who in turn instructed the executive officer, secunderabad cantonment board, 1st respondent, to look into the matter and solve the same. as there was no .....

Dr. Sunil Kumar Vyas Vs. Chief Secretary, Government of Nct of Delhi, ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... the apex body to regulate education in indian medicine, vide order dated 09.05.1991, in order to maintain parity in the teaching posts recommended by the university grants commission (ugc). the aandu tibbia college changed the nomenclature and re-designated the post of demonstrator as lecturer of all incumbents working as demonstrators, re-designating ..... of delhi. one post of demonstrator still exists in the institution, for which continuation of post is still obtained from the competent authority. according to the tibbia college act, 1952, the posts of reader, sr. lecturer grade-i, jr. lecturer and demonstrator were in existence. in 1985, the posts of sr. lecturer grade-i ..... appointed on the post of demonstrator, and he is still continuing on the post of demonstrator. however, it has been admitted that according to the tibbia college act, 1952, the posts of reader, senior lecturer grade-i, junior lecturer and demonstrator were in existence, and that in the year 1985 the posts of senior .....

Amp Spg. and Wvg. Mills (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in : (2006)100ITD142(Ahd.)

..... judges have set themselves in this branch of the law to try to frame the law as they would like to have it. . . .'" [see samples of law making (oxford university press), pp. 70-71.] a statute", says max radin, "is neither a literary text nor a divine revelation. its effect is, therefore, neither an expression laid on immutable emotional ..... and sale of shares should take place in the same year.referring to the calcutta high court in the case of cit v. sun distributors & mining co. ltd. [1993] 68 taxman 223 the ld. dr contended that what is to be seen is whether the business of the assessee consists of purchase and sale of shares. he also ..... held that it would be wholly unreasonable to import the observations and findings of such distinct and distinguished surroundings to an altogether independent and unrelated field viz., the income-tax act, 1961. in the second case, he observed that the supreme court was called upon to give a definition of the words "consumer", "goods" and to decide whether " .....

Union Of India Vs. Rajeev Bansal

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... , (1974) 3 scc349[11].; k m sharma v. ito, (2002) 4 scc339[14].; m a merchant (supra) [8]. 61 dr premchandran keezhoth v. chancellor, kannur university, 2023 scc online sc1592[73]. 62 cit v. anjum m.h. ghaswala, (2002) 1 scc633[27].; state of u p v. singhara singh, 1963 scc online sc23[8 ..... the specified authority; explanation 3. for the purposes of this section, specified authority means the specified authority referred to in section 151.]. 20 section 148a, income tax act [it reads: section 148a. conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice under section 148. the assessing officer shall, before issuing any notice under section 148, ..... sanction or approval, or such other action, by whatever name called, by any authority, commission or tribunal, by whatever name called, under the provisions of the specified act; [ ]. and where completion of compliance of such action has not been made within such time, then, the time- limit for completion or compliance of such action shall .....

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. Ives Drugs (India) (P.) Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Indore

Reported in : (1996)59ITD625Indore

..... that in common parlance word 'plant' includes within its ambit buildings and equipments used for manufacturing purposes. it further observed that section 43 (3) of the act gives an inclusive definition of the expression 'plant' which indicates that the legislature intended to give to the word 'plant' an extended meaning which went even ..... a question arose whether the portion of the walls of the freezing chamber containing insulation materials constituted 'plant' within the meaning of section 43 (3) of the act. the assessee had claimed that the factory building was part of an air-conditioning machinery or plant. the assessee's claim was negatived by the revenue authorities. ..... as plant in the facts and circumstances of the assessee's case. the expression 'plant' has been defined in sub-section (3) of section 43 of the act as under : "plant' includes ships, vehicles, books, scientific apparatus and surgical equipments used for the purposes of the business or profession." the above definition of .....

Naveen Jindal Vs. M/S Zee Media Corporation Ltd and Anr

Court : Delhi

..... in haryana. he is also described as the chairman of m/s.jindal steel & power limited. his varied interests, including his educational qualifications from the university of texas, usa, his crusade regarding the national flag and having participated in international level shooting events including the asian games have been described. defendant no. ..... deliberate harm and the prejudice to the plaintiff. suggestions are being made in the course of the programmes to suggest that the entire administrative machinery is acting in collusion with the plaintiff. it is further urged that though the version of the plaintiff is purportedly aired, it is a highly edited version and ..... the news programmes published and broadcasted by defendants no.1 and 2 are motivated with the intent of sensationalizing the matter and conducting a media trial. the acts are per se defamatory, false, frivolous and misleading.12. it is averred that the defendants have aired more than 20 false, defamatory programmes against the .....

Ftc Vs. Superior Ct. Tla

Court : US Supreme Court

..... who continued to take cases were soon overloaded. the overall response of the uptown lawyers to the pds call for help was feeble, reflecting their universal distaste for criminal law, their special aversion for compelled indigency representation, the near epidemic siege of self-doubt about their ability to handle cases in ..... at issue." the social justifications proffered for respondents' restraint of trade thus do not make it any less unlawful. the statutory policy underlying the sherman act "precludes inquiry into the question whether competition is good or bad." ibid. respondents' argument, like that made by the petitioners in professional engineers, ultimately ..... the district of columbia government increased the lawyers' compensation. the questions presented are whether the lawyers' concerted conduct violated 5 of the federal trade commission act and if so, whether it was nevertheless protected by the first amendment to the constitution. [ footnote 1 ] i the burden of providing competent .....

Sri Nipun Mehrotra Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Reported in : (2008)110ITD520(Bang.)

..... to waste its words or to say anything in vain and a construction which attributes redundancy to the legislature will not be accepted except for compelling reasons.bhavnagar university v. palitana sugar mill p. ltd. construction of statute that statutory enactment must ordinarily be construed according to their plain meaning and no words should be added ..... to prevent a provision from being unintelligible, absurd, unreasonable, unworkable or totally irreconcilable with the rest of the statue.8. section 54(2) was substituted by the finance act, 1987. the scope and effect of amendments were elaborated vide circular no. 495 dt.22^nd october, 87. section 54(2) and 54f(4) were introduced to ..... section 139. hence, one cannot interpret that section 139 mentioned should be read as section 139(1). similar language is appearing in section 54(2) of the it act.cit v. rajesh kumar jalan 286 itr 274 has held that section 139 mentioned will not only include section 139(1) but will also include all sub- .....