Court : Assam State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Gauhati
..... to the respondent/petitioner. 2. the case in brief is that the respondent/petitioner sent rs. 2,000/- by tmo to his daughter at aligarh university, aligarh on 26.7.1995 through the tezpur head post office, but the tmo was not delivered in time. when the respondent/petitioner brought this to the notice of the appellant/opposite party on ..... . 7. the appellant also brought to our notice a number of cases in which the national consumer disputes redressal commission has held that unless there is fraud, wilful act or default in the course of transmission by post, officers of the post office cannot be held liable. in this respect specific mention may be made to post master ..... such loss, misdelivery, delay or damage to any postal articles in course of transmission by post. the respondent has not been able to prove that there was any wilful act or default on the part of the appellant nor there is anything which can be termed as fraudulent. we are, therefore, inclined to agree to the contention that .....
Tag this Judgment!