Telecasting - Year 2017 - Judgments

Feb 28 2017 (HC)

Devas Multimedia Private Limited vs.antrix Corporation Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-28-2017

in the high court of delhi at new delhi o m p i 558 2015 reserved on 14 h december...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 2017 (SC)

Competition Commission of India Vs. Co-Ordination Committee of Artists ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-07-2017

..... of west bengal film and television investors hereinafter referred to as the coordination committee telecasting of serial mahabharat in bangla after dubbing it in the said language from the ..... committee foreclosed the business opportunities for the businessmen engaged in the production distribution and exhibition telecast of such programmes the dg therefore concluded that the actions on the part of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 08 2017 (HC)

Naveen Jindal vs.m/s Zee Media Corporation Ltd. & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-08-2017

..... defendants however issues have been claimed and accordingly framed on the aspect of the said telecast and publication being defamatory 6 the plaintiff moved the aforesaid application under order 11 rule ..... the document of which the plaintiff seeks production namely the original recording of the impugned telecast and the original publication of the impugned article would obviously be in the power and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 27 2017 (HC)

Rakhee Gupta vs.pramod Bajaj & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

..... the learned magistrate records specific finding as to how the petitioner was concerned with the telecast of so called defamatory episode he could not be made vicariously liable for the defamation ..... in their statements have stated as to how the petitioner had got concern with the telecast of the disputed objectionable episode the petitioner therefore cannot be made vicariously liable for episode .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 28 2017 (HC)

Achla Sabharwal vs.national Film Development Corp. Ltd. & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-2017

..... in the suit injunction was also claimed against respondents defendants from telecasting the film nehle pe dehla on 5 10 2007 or on ..... no 1 without obtaining permission consent from the appellant plaintiff telecasted the subject film on 5 10 2007 it is also pleaded ..... dated 28 11 2007 plaintiff had informed the defendants about their telecast rights and had requested the defendant not to release the royalty .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 27 2017 (HC)

Pramod Kumar Bajaj vs.the State & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

..... the learned magistrate records specific finding as to how the petitioner was concerned with the telecast of so called defamatory episode he could not be made vicariously liable for the defamation ..... in their statements have stated as to how the petitioner had got concern with the telecast of the disputed objectionable episode the petitioner therefore cannot be made vicariously liable for episode .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 27 2017 (HC)

Krishan Pal vs.state & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

..... the learned magistrate records specific finding as to how the petitioner was concerned with the telecast of so called defamatory episode he could not be made vicariously liable for the defamation ..... in their statements have stated as to how the petitioner had got concern with the telecast of the disputed objectionable episode the petitioner therefore cannot be made vicariously liable for episode .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 27 2017 (HC)

N S Bundela vs.state & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

..... the learned magistrate records specific finding as to how the petitioner was concerned with the telecast of so called defamatory episode he could not be made vicariously liable for the defamation ..... in their statements have stated as to how the petitioner had got concern with the telecast of the disputed objectionable episode the petitioner therefore cannot be made vicariously liable for episode .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 27 2017 (HC)

Rishi Pal vs.state & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

..... the learned magistrate records specific finding as to how the petitioner was concerned with the telecast of so called defamatory episode he could not be made vicariously liable for the defamation ..... in their statements have stated as to how the petitioner had got concern with the telecast of the disputed objectionable episode the petitioner therefore cannot be made vicariously liable for episode .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 27 2017 (HC)

Pramod Kumar Bajaj & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

..... the learned magistrate records specific finding as to how the petitioner was concerned with the telecast of so called defamatory episode he could not be made vicariously liable for the defamation ..... in their statements have stated as to how the petitioner had got concern with the telecast of the disputed objectionable episode the petitioner therefore cannot be made vicariously liable for episode .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Telecasting - Judgment Search Results