Telecasting - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: telecasting Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 20 results (0.005 seconds)Syed Meiraj Vs. Election Officer and Commissioner, Sherilingampalli, R ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-07-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)ALD127; 2000(2)ALT793
orderm s liberhan cj 1 the appellant who is one of the aspirants to contest to the ward membership in...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhupinder Singh Vs. Smt. Kanchan Rani
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-28-2000
Reported in: AIR2001HP16,II(2000)DMC365
kuldip chand sood j 1 this appeal under section 47 of the guardians and wards act 1890 hereinafter referred to...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGlobal Tele Systems (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-18-2000
Reported in: 2000(71)ECC67
d h waghela j 1 this application is filed under section 482 of he code of criminal procedure with a...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSabitanjali Pattanaik Vs. Priyabrata Pattanaik
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Dec-11-2000
Reported in: 91(2001)CLT181
pradipta ray j 1 the respondent filed an application under section 13 of the hindu marriage act for a decree...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRan Vijay Singh Chauhan Vs. Joint Director of Education, Jhansi and Ot ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-19-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)AWC744; (2001)1UPLBEC407
v m sahai j 1 the question that arises for consideration in thispetition filed by seniormost teacher l t grade...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKannambadi Sreenivasa Iyengar's Sri Harihareswara Devasthana Trust and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-10-2000
Reported in: AIR2000Kant356; ILR2000KAR3201; 2001(4)KarLJ264
..... which is not permissible under law the appellant is restrained from issuing for print or telecasting the impugned advertisements in the same form or in any other form disparaging the product .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdwave Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2000
Reported in: 2000IIIAD(Delhi)154; 84(2000)DLT638; 2000(53)DRJ262
..... be no order as to costs constitution of india article 226 challenge to stoppage of telecast of television programme no illegality in decision making process no procedural impropriety or excesses in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ. Alexander Vs. Central Bureau of Investigatin, Bangalore
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-09-2000
Reported in: ILR2000KAR1418; 2000(3)KarLJ628
..... which is not permissible under law the appellant is restrained from issuing for print or telecasting the impugned advertisements in the same form or in any other form disparaging the product .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaj Chowdhury Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-05-2000
Reported in: AIR2000Cal232,(2000)3CALLT376(HC)
..... kendra calcutta being the respondent no 4 whereby the petitioner s application for extension of telecast of the mega serial mahaprabhu beyond 455 episodes was rejected 2 briefly stated facts are ..... sarkar learned counsel while opposing the writ petition argues that there was no agreement for telecasting 500 episodes there was agreement originally for 65 episodes and from time to time mutually .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBimalendu De and Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-21-2000
Reported in: AIR2001Cal30
..... it was prayed that a declaration be given that the telecasting of the three television programmes namely fashion show kaun banega ..... state of west bengal to forthwith pass necessary orders prohibiting telecast of the aforesaid three programmes this petition was entertained by ..... 2000 directing the respondent nos 1 and 2 to prohibit telecast of the aforesaid programmes aggrieved against this order passed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial