T - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: t Page 1 of about 13,335 results (0.053 seconds)T. A. Vs. Trust Alleppey V. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: (1999)152CTR(SC)439
submitted that if we were to accept the correctness of the impugned judgment, the functioning of the Tribunals would be destroyed.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCce Vs. T
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Reported in: (2003)(89)ECC448
57G and submits that there is no due compliance of the Rules and Modvat Credit cannot be taken on documents other
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA vs.t
Court: Delhi
parties are negotiating settlement during the pendency of a matter, then the Court will condone the delay in filing of written
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCc Vs. T
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Reported in: (1996)(65)LC322Tri(Chennai)
for loading the invoice and we find no infirmity in the order passed by the Collector of Customs (Appeals) in this
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT Vs. Suzuki Limited
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Reported in: (1999)(112)ELT173Tri(Chennai)
circumstances of this case. But that is not to say that the appellants are not liable to penalty. We observe the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT Vs. Electronics Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Reported in: (2004)(167)ELT155Tri(Bang.)
data. Whether it fulfils second part of the description of the tariff entry 84.71 or not for classifying the item under
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT Vs. Suzuki Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Reported in: (1997)(92)ELT386Tri(Chennai)
has urged that the appellants are liable to penalty and the penalty levied cannot be considered as excessive.5. We have considered
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTForest Grove School Dist. Vs. T. A.
Court: US Supreme Court
may or must be excused.[ Footnote 7 ] Looking primarily to clauses (i) and (ii), the School District argues that Congress
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT.R. Pratt (Bombay) Limited Vs. M.T. Limited
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (1938)40BOMLR1109
at 5 p.m., and the other at 5-15 p.m. At the first the board of Pratts resolved upon the execution of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTH.M.T. Ltd. Vs. H.M.T. Head Office Employees' Assocn. and others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: 1996IXAD(SC)108; AIR1997SC585; [1997(75)FLR29]; JT1996(10)SC64; 1996(7)SCALE898; (1996)11SCC319; [1996]Supp8SCR69
1978 settlement?2. If so, what should be the quantum and the period for which such quantum is to be paid in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>